Effects of Carbon Nanotubes on Processing Stability of Polyoxymethylene in Melt−Mixing Process
Source abstract
Abstract
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) filled polyoxymethylene (POM) composites were fabricated in order to form conducting pathways at a low CNT loading. It was found that addition of CNTs would lead to a drastic degradation of POM in the melt−mixing process. The effects of CNTs on the processing stability of POM were investigated by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis. The results obtained show that the degradation behavior of POM is closely related to the surface chemical properties of CNTs. The presence of carboxylic acid groups on CNT surfaces catalyzes and accelerates the degradation of POM through acidolysis and hydrolysis, and results in a significant decrease in the processing stability of POM. However, graphitized CNT−POM mixtures show high processing stability due to the effective removal of functional groups on CNT surfaces during the graphitization process. Graphitized CNT/POM composites possess good electrical properties and a low percolation threshold of ca. 0.5 wt %, so they have a large potential to be applied as electronic components, self-controlled heaters, overcurrent protectors, and other functional devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer crystallization and properties · Carbon Nanotubes in Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 72 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110016, People's Republic of China, and School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, 9 Hunnan East Road, Shenyang 110168, People's Republic of China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Baughman R. H. · Science · 2002 · 297 · 78710.1126/science.1060928 ↗
2. Tománek D. · 2000
3. Vigolo B. · Science · 2005 · 309 · 92010.1126/science.1112835 ↗
4. Thostenson E. T. · Compos. Sci. Technol. · 2005 · 65 · 49110.1016/j.compscitech.2004.11.003 ↗
5. Du F. · Phys. Rev. B · 2005 · 72 · 12140410.1103/PhysRevB.72.121404 ↗
6. Bryning M. B. · Adv. Mater. · 2005 · 17 · 118610.1002/adma.200401649 ↗
7. Sandler J. K. W. · Polymer · 2003 · 44 · 589310.1016/S0032-3861(03)00539-1 ↗
8. Bernholc J. · Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. · 2002 · 32 · 34710.1146/annurev.matsci.32.112601.134925 ↗
9. Chen Y. C. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2002 · 81 · 97510.1063/1.1498007 ↗
10. Nogales A. · Macromolecules · 2004 · 37 · 766910.1021/ma049440r ↗
11. Breuer O. · Polym. Compos. · 2004 · 25 · 63010.1002/pc.20058 ↗
12. Harris P. J. F. · Int. Mater. Rev. · 2004 · 49 · 3110.1179/095066004225010505 ↗
13. McNally T. · Polymer · 2005 · 46 · 822210.1016/j.polymer.2005.06.094 ↗
14. Shofner M. L. · Chem. Mater. · 2006 · 18 · 90610.1021/cm051475y ↗
15. Gubbels F. · Macromolecules · 1995 · 28 · 155910.1021/ma00109a030 ↗
16. Strumpler R. · J. Electroceram. · 1999 · 3 · 32910.1023/A:1009909812823 ↗
17. Du F. · Macromolecules · 2004 · 37 · 904810.1021/ma049164g ↗
18. Tucknott R. · Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 281 · 45510.1016/S0301-0104(02)00615-8 ↗
19. Pötschke P. · Carbon · 2004 · 42 · 96510.1016/j.carbon.2003.12.001 ↗
20. He X. J. · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2005 · 86 · 06211210.1063/1.1863452 ↗
21. Grujicic M. · J. Mater. Sci. · 2004 · 39 · 444110.1023/B:JMSC.0000034136.11779.96 ↗
22. Kim Y. A. · Chem. Phys. Lett. · 2003 · 380 · 31910.1016/j.cplett.2003.09.027 ↗
23. Andrews R. · Acc. Chem. Res. · 2002 · 35 · 100810.1021/ar010151m ↗
24. Andrews R. · Carbon · 2001 · 39 · 168110.1016/S0008-6223(00)00301-8 ↗
25. Sinnott S. B. · J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. · 2002 · 2 · 11310.1166/jnn.2002.107 ↗
26. Li H. L. · J. Sichuan Univ. · 2005 · 37 · 65
27. Fang H. T. · Chem. Mater. · 2004 · 16 · 574410.1021/cm035263h ↗
28. Okpalugo T. I. T. · Carbon · 2005 · 43 · 15310.1016/j.carbon.2004.08.033 ↗
29. Sham M. L. · Carbon · 2006 · 44 · 76810.1016/j.carbon.2005.09.013 ↗
30. Lüftl S. · Polym. Degrad. Stabil. · 2006 · 91 · 46410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.01.029 ↗
31. Stohler F. R. · Angew. Makromol. Chem. · 1990 · 176 · 32310.1002/apmc.1990.051760125 ↗
32. Archodoulaki V. M. · Polym. Test · 2006 · 25 · 8310.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.08.011 ↗
33. Bae J. · Macromol. Chem. Phys. · 2002 · 203 · 219610.1002/1521-3935(200211)203:15<2196::AID-MACP2196>3.0.CO;2-U ↗
34. Sui G. · China Rubber Ind. · 2005 · 52 · 5
35. Pötschke P. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2004 · 40 · 13710.1016/j.eurpolymj.2003.08.008 ↗
36. Jog J. P. · Mater. Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 22 · 79710.1179/174328406X101300 ↗