Optimization of Layered Cathode Material with Full Concentration Gradient for Lithium-Ion Batteries
Source abstract
Abstract
Li[Ni x Co y Mn 1– x – y ]O 2 cathode materials were synthesized with varying concentration gradients of Ni and Co ions from the particle center (0.62–0.74 mol % for Ni and 0.05 mol % for Co) to the surface (0.48–0.62 mol % for Ni and 0.18 mol % for Co), i.e., full concentration gradient (FCG) with fixed Mn concentrations. In particular, the Mn concentration (20, 25, and 33 mol %) was controlled to optimize electrode performance. The average chemical compositions of lithiated products were Li[Ni x Co 0.16 Mn 0.84– x ]O 2 ( x = 0.64, 0.59, 0.51). These cathode materials with concentration gradients followed the general performance trend of conventional layered materials; an increase in Ni content improved the capacity, whereas a higher amount of Mn delivered better capacity retention and thermal properties at the expense of capacity. As a result, we determined an optimal level of Mn concentration among the tested FCG cathodes, which maximized the discharge capacity of 188 mAh g –1 and had an excellent capacity retention of 96% over 100 cycles operated up to 4.3 V at 25 °C, with a composition of FCG Li[Ni 0.59 Co 0.16 Mn 0.25 ]O 2 .
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advancements in Battery Materials · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advanced Battery Technologies Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Energy Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, South Korea
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, South Korea
Department and Institute of Nano Engineering, Sejong University, 98 Gunja-dong, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul 143-747, South Korea
Chemistry Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Goodenough J. B. · Chem. Mater. · 2010 · 22 · 58710.1021/cm901452z ↗
2. Etacheri V. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 324310.1039/c1ee01598b ↗
3. Jeong G. · Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 198610.1039/c0ee00831a ↗
4. Liao P. Y. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2005 · 152 · A169510.1149/1.1952687 ↗
5. Li J. · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 189 · 2810.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.12.046 ↗
6. Cheralathan K. K. · J. Power Sources · 2010 · 195 · 148610.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.101 ↗
7. Sun Y.-K. · J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2005 · 127 · 1341110.1021/ja053675g ↗
8. Sun Y.-K. · Nat. Mater. · 2009 · 8 · 32010.1038/nmat2418 ↗
9. Sun Y.-K. · Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 94210.1038/nmat3435 ↗
10. Noh H.-J. · Chem. Mater. · 2013 · 25 · 210910.1021/cm4006772 ↗
11. Lee M.-H. · Electrochim. Acta · 2004 · 50 · 93910.1016/j.electacta.2004.07.038 ↗
12. Roisnel T. · 2002
13. Dees D. W. · J. Power Sources · 2009 · 189 · 26310.1016/j.jpowsour.2008.09.045 ↗
14. Noh H.-J. · J. Power Sources · 2013 · 233 · 12110.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.01.063 ↗
15. Lee K. S. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2007 · 154 · A97110.1149/1.2769831 ↗
16. Sun Y.-K. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2007 · 154 · A93710.1149/1.2763970 ↗
17. Shizuka K. · J. Power Sources · 2005 · 146 · 58910.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.046 ↗
18. Myung S.-T. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2008 · 155 · A37410.1149/1.2883733 ↗
19. Milewska A. · Solid State Ionics · 2011 · 192 · 31310.1016/j.ssi.2010.11.026 ↗
20. Guilmard M. · Chem. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 448410.1021/cm030340u ↗
21. Belharouak I. · Electrochem. Commun. · 2006 · 8 · 32910.1016/j.elecom.2005.12.007 ↗
22. Wu L. · Chem. Mater. · 2011 · 23 · 395310.1021/cm201452q ↗
23. Noh H.-J. · Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2013 · 23 · 102810.1002/adfm.201200699 ↗
24. Sun Y.-K. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2010 · 157 · A133510.1149/1.3497304 ↗
25. Sun Y.-K. · J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2012 · 159 · A110.1149/2.004201jes ↗