Stability of the LiBH4/CeH2 Composite System Determined by Dynamic pcT Measurements
Source abstract
Abstract
We determined the stability of the LiBH 4 /CeH 2 composite system by dynamic pcT (pressure, composition, temperature) measurements by using different constant hydrogen flows and by extrapolating ln( p des / p 0 ) linearly to equilibrium at zero flow. During desorption, the reaction 6LiBH 4 + CeH 2 → 6LiH + CeB 6 + 10H 2 occurs, leading to a theoretical hydrogen capacity of the destabilized system of 7.4 mass %. Within the model used and by applying the Van ˈt Hoff equation, the following thermodynamic parameters were determined for the desorption: enthalpy of reaction Δ r H = (58 ± 3) kJ mol −1 H 2 and entropy of reaction Δ r S = (113 ± 4) J K −1 mol −1 H 2, leading to a decomposition temperature T dec = (240 ± 32) °C at a hydrogen pressure of p 0 = 1.01325 bar, compared with Δ r H = 74 kJ mol −1 H 2 and Δ r S = 115 J K −1 mol −1 H 2 ( T dec = 370 °C) for pure LiBH 4 . 1
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Empa. Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Division “Hydrogen and Energy”, Überlandstrasse 129, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland, and Materials/Devices Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 136-791, Republic of Korea
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Mauron Ph. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2008 · 112 · 90610.1021/jp077572r ↗
2. Züttel A. · J. Alloys Compd. · 2003 · 356 · 51510.1016/S0925-8388(02)01253-7 ↗
3. Züttel A. · J. Power Sources · 2003 · 118 · 110.1016/S0378-7753(03)00054-5 ↗
4. Schlapbach L. · Nature · 2001 · 414 · 2310.1038/35104634 ↗
5. Orimo S. · Chem. Rev. · 2007 · 107 · 411110.1021/cr0501846 ↗
6. Lide D. R. · 2005
7. Yang J. · Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1913410.1021/jp076434z ↗
8. Cerny R. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2009 · 113 · 1458210.1021/jp9062687 ↗
9. Nakamori Y. · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2007 · 446 · 29610.1016/j.jallcom.2007.03.144 ↗
10. Ravnsbaek D. · Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. · 2009 · 48 · 665910.1002/anie.200903030 ↗
11. Friedrichs O. · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys
12. Söderlund M. · Catal. Lett. · 2005 · 105 · 19110.1007/s10562-005-8690-9 ↗
13. Vajo J. J. · J. Phys. Chem. B · 2005 · 109 · 371910.1021/jp040769o ↗
14. Vajo, J. J.; Mertens, F. O.; Skeith, S.; Balogh, M. P.Int. Pub. No WO/2005/097671 A2 (patent pending), 2005.
15. Barkhordarian G. · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2007 · 440 · L1810.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.048 ↗
16. Barkhordarian, G.; Klassen, T.; Bormann, R.German Pub. No. DE102004061286 (patent pending), 2004.
17. Vajo J. J. · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2007 · 446 · 40910.1016/j.jallcom.2007.02.080 ↗
18. Bösenberg U. · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 395110.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.010 ↗
19. Pinkerton F. E. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2007 · 111 · 1288110.1021/jp0742867 ↗
20. Jin S.-A. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2008 · 112 · 952010.1021/jp802338n ↗
21. Shim J.-H. · J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2010 · 1 · 5910.1021/jz900012n ↗
22. Luo W. · J. Alloy. Compd. · 2004 · 385 · 22410.1016/j.jallcom.2004.05.004 ↗
23. Martelli P. · J. Phys. Chem. C · 2010 · 114 · 717310.1021/jp909341z ↗
24. Bielmann M. · Rev. Sci. Instrum. · 2009 · 80 · 08290110.1063/1.3186731 ↗
25. Bruker AXS Home Page.www.bruker-axs.com. (Accessed Aug 31, 2010.)