The structural transitions of Ti3AlC2 induced by ion irradiation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The structural transitions of Ti3AlC2 induced by ion irradiation were investigated over a wide fluence range by transmission electron microscopy. No amorphization occurs even at the highest dose of 31 dpa, indicating a great tolerance to irradiation-induced amorphization. Dynamic electron diffraction simulations and high-resolution observations indicate that the nanolamellar structure of Ti3AlC2 is readily destroyed through the formation of antisite defects and a phase transformation from α-Ti3AlC2 to β-Ti3AlC2 occurs at 2.61 dpa. A great number of stacking faults in basal planes are formed with increasing fluence, leading to the formation of nano Ti3AlC2 grains with different stacking sequences at 10.45 dpa. Serious structural damage and polygonization are observed at the highest dose of 31 dpa. Due to the similar structural transition process with some complex oxides (pyrochlore and murataite), it is assumed that the great irradiation tolerance of Ti3AlC2 results from the low formation energy of antisite defects. These findings first clarify the structural transition mechanism of Ti3AlC2 under ion irradiation and its relationship with irradiation tolerance, which is of vital importance in understanding the irradiation response of MAX phases and provides a clue in searching for materials with higher irradiation tolerance from MAX phases.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Advanced materials and composites · Nuclear materials and radiation effects
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Tzenov · J Am Ceram Soc · 2000 · 83 · 82510.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01281.x ↗
2. Barsoum · J Am Ceram Soc · 1996 · 79 · 195310.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08018.x ↗
3. Barsoum · Scripta Mater · 1997 · 36 · 53510.1016/S1359-6462(96)00418-6 ↗
4. El-Raghy · J Am Ceram Soc · 1997 · 80 · 51310.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02861.x ↗
5. Wang · Corros Sci · 2003 · 45 · 89110.1016/S0010-938X(02)00177-4 ↗
6. Nappé · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 385 · 30410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.018 ↗
7. Le Flem · Int J Appl Ceram Technol · 2010 · 7 · 76610.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02523.x ↗
8. Liu · J Nucl Mater · 2010 · 401 · 14910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.04.015 ↗
9. Whittle · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 436210.1016/j.actamat.2010.04.029 ↗
10. Ma · Philos Mag · 2004 · 84 · 296910.1080/14786430410001716197 ↗
11. Nappé · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 409 · 5310.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.235 ↗
12. Liu · Nucl Instrum Methods B · 2010 · 268 · 50610.1016/j.nimb.2009.11.017 ↗
13. Yang · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 420 · 43010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.033 ↗
14. Yang · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 427 · 22510.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.014 ↗
15. Wang · J Nucl Mater · 2013 · 440 · 60610.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.070 ↗
16. Pietzka · J Phase Equilibr · 1994 · 15 · 39210.1007/BF02647559 ↗
17. Roar K, Chris O, Bin D, Kenji T, Wharton S, Laurence M. EDM: Electron Direct Methods. .
18. Lin · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 100910.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.028 ↗
19. Vincent · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 104 · 11490410.1063/1.3021162 ↗
20. Moll · J Appl Phys · 2009 · 105 · 02351210.1063/1.3066279 ↗
21. Zhou · Mater Res Innov · 2000 · 3 · 28610.1007/PL00010876 ↗
22. Wang · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 14410810.1103/PhysRevB.69.144108 ↗
23. Sattonnay · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 101 · 10351610.1063/1.2733745 ↗
24. Moll · J Appl Phys · 2009 · 106 · 07350910.1063/1.3236567 ↗
25. Simeone · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 13411610.1103/PhysRevB.70.134116 ↗
26. Farber · J Appl Phys · 1999 · 86 · 254010.1063/1.371089 ↗
27. Yu · J Mater Res · 2002 · 17 · 94810.1557/JMR.2002.0141 ↗
28. Barsoum · J Am Ceram Soc · 1999 · 82 · 254510.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02117.x ↗
29. Barbot · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 413 · 16210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.04.022 ↗
30. Zinkle · Nucl Instrum Methods B · 2012 · 286 · 410.1016/j.nimb.2012.03.030 ↗
31. Nakai · J Nucl Mater · 1992 · 630 · 191
32. Gaboriaud · Nucl Instrum Methods B · 2013 · 311 · 8610.1016/j.nimb.2013.06.015 ↗
33. Middleburgh · J Am Ceram Soc · 2013 · 96 · 319610.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05452.x ↗
34. Aidhy · Phys Chem Chem Phys · 2013 · 15 · 1891510.1039/c3cp53052c ↗
35. Zhang · Appl Surf Sci · 2012 · 258 · 628110.1016/j.apsusc.2012.03.022 ↗
36. Wilhelmsson · J Cryst Growth · 2006 · 291 · 29010.1016/j.jcrysgro.2006.03.008 ↗
37. Matar · J Mater Chem · 1997 · 7 · 9910.1039/a605113h ↗
38. Riaz · Mater Sci Technol · 2000 · 16 · 98410.1179/026708300101508937 ↗
39. Sickafus · J Nucl Mater · 1999 · 274 · 6610.1016/S0022-3115(99)00041-0 ↗
40. Matzke · Nucl Instrum Methods B · 1994 · 91 · 29410.1016/0168-583X(94)96234-0 ↗
41. Matzke · J Nucl Mater · 1997 · 247 · 10810.1016/S0022-3115(97)00081-0 ↗
42. Burggraaf · Nucl Instrum Methods B · 1988 · 32 · 3210.1016/0168-583X(88)90175-9 ↗
43. Lian · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 68 · 13410710.1103/PhysRevB.68.134107 ↗
44. Lian · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 11353610.1063/1.1926394 ↗
45. Sickafus · Science · 2000 · 289 · 74810.1126/science.289.5480.748 ↗
46. Sattonnay · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 108 · 10351210.1063/1.3503452 ↗
47. Begg · J Nucl Mater · 2001 · 289 · 18810.1016/S0022-3115(00)00696-6 ↗
48. Zhou · J Mater Chem · 2001 · 11 · 233510.1039/b101520f ↗
49. Medvedeva · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1604210.1103/PhysRevB.58.16042 ↗