journal article·2012-10

Atomistic characterization of pseudoelasticity and shape memory in NiTi nanopillars

Yuan Zhong, Ken Gall, Ting Zhu

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 18
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Molecular dynamics simulations are performed to study the atomistic mechanisms governing the pseudoelasticity and shape memory in nickel–titanium (NiTi) nanostructures. For a 〈1 1 0〉 – oriented nanopillar subjected to compressive loading–unloading, we observe either a pseudoelastic or shape memory response, depending on the applied strain and temperature that control the reversibility of phase transformation and deformation twinning. We show that irreversible twinning arises owing to the dislocation pinning of twin boundaries, while hierarchically twinned microstructures facilitate the reversible twinning. The nanoscale size effects are manifested as the load serration, stress plateau and large hysteresis loop in stress–strain curves that result from the high stresses required to drive the nucleation-controlled phase transformation and deformation twinning in nanosized volumes. Our results underscore the importance of atomistically resolved modeling for understanding the phase and deformation reversibilities that dictate the pseudoelasticity and shape memory behavior in nanostructured shape memory alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
2. Otsuka · MRS Bull · 2002 · 27 · 9110.1557/mrs2002.43 ↗
3. Otsuka · 1998
4. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
5. Zhu · Prog Mater Sci · 2010 · 55 · 71010.1016/j.pmatsci.2010.04.001 ↗
6. Juan · Nat Nanotechnol · 2009 · 4 · 41510.1038/nnano.2009.142 ↗
7. Krulevitch · J Microelectromech Syst · 1996 · 5 · 27010.1109/84.546407 ↗
8. Ma · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 377310.1063/1.1623942 ↗
9. Waitz · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 13710.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.036 ↗
10. Waitz · Europhys Lett · 2005 · 71 · 9810.1209/epl/i2005-10061-y ↗
11. Frick · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 384510.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.034 ↗
12. Waitz · J Mech Phys Solids · 2007 · 55 · 41910.1016/j.jmps.2006.06.006 ↗
13. Norfleet · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 354910.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.009 ↗
14. Gunderov · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 503 · 7510.1016/j.msea.2008.08.044 ↗
15. Ye · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 49010.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.027 ↗
16. Clark · Adv Eng Mater · 2010 · 12 · 80810.1002/adem.201000048 ↗
17. Simon · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 185010.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.028 ↗
18. Chen · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 53710.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.057 ↗
19. Phillips · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 187110.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.053 ↗
20. Juan · Adv Mater · 2008 · 20 · 27210.1002/adma.200701527 ↗
21. Juan · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 409310.1016/j.actamat.2012.04.021 ↗
22. Lai · J Phys – Condens Matter · 2000 · 12 · L5310.1088/0953-8984/12/5/101 ↗
23. Huang · Nat Mater · 2003 · 2 · 30710.1038/nmat884 ↗
24. Wagner · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 623210.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.043 ↗
25. Hatcher · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 02020210.1103/PhysRevB.79.020202 ↗
26. Hatcher · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 14420310.1103/PhysRevB.80.144203 ↗
27. Kibey · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 162410.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.008 ↗
28. Zhong · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 110 · 03353210.1063/1.3621429 ↗
29. Mutter · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 22420110.1103/PhysRevB.82.224201 ↗
30. Mutter · Eur Phys J B · 2011 · 84 · 10910.1140/epjb/e2011-20661-4 ↗
31. Pun · J Phys – Condens Matter · 2010 · 22 · 39540310.1088/0953-8984/22/39/395403 ↗
32. Holec · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 22411910.1103/PhysRevB.84.224119 ↗
33. Park · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 25550410.1103/PhysRevLett.95.255504 ↗
34. Liang · Nano Lett · 2005 · 5 · 203910.1021/nl0515910 ↗
35. Li · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 20543510.1103/PhysRevB.82.205435 ↗
36. Li · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 24543310.1103/PhysRevB.81.245433 ↗
37. Finnis · Philos Mag A – Phys Condens Matter Struct Defects Mech Prop · 1984 · 50 · 45
38. Plimpton · J Comput Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
39. Brill · J Phys – Condens Matter · 1991 · 3 · 962110.1088/0953-8984/3/48/004 ↗
40. Otsuka · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · 273 · 8910.1016/S0921-5093(99)00291-9 ↗
41. Qiu S, Clausen B, II SAP, Noebe RD, Vaidyanathan R. Acta Materialia 2011;59:5055.10.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.018 ↗
42. Ishida · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 557110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00420-8 ↗
43. Fu · Thin Solid Films · 2006 · 515 · 8010.1016/j.tsf.2005.12.039 ↗
44. Juan · J Mater Res · 2011 · 26 · 246110.1557/jmr.2011.291 ↗