Simulations of hydrogen diffusion at grain boundaries in aluminum
Source abstract
Abstract
Long-timescale simulations of hydrogen atom diffusion in aluminum at low concentration were carried out to study the effect grain boundaries can have on the diffusion mechanism and diffusion rate. Three different grain boundaries were studied: R5 twist, R5 tilt and general, twist + tilt, grain boundaries. The adaptive kinetic Monte Carlo method was used to simulate the system over time intervals spanning tens of microseconds. A potential function of the effective medium form was parametrized to density functional theory calculations and used to describe the atomic interactions. The twist boundary turns out to block diffusion across the boundary – only a few high-energy sites are found in the boundary layer. However, diffusion parallel to the boundary is slightly enhanced because of the reduced configuration space. The twist and twist + tilt grain boundaries have strong binding sites within the boundary layer, up to 0.1 and 0.3 eV stronger, respectively, than binding sites in the crystal. In the latter case, the H atom spends more than 99% of the time in the grain boundary layer and diffusion parallel to the grain boundary occurs only when the H atom re-enters a crystal grain. Because of the trapping, the diffusion is reduced by more than an order of magnitude compared with the crystal.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Edwards · Scripta Metall · 1980 · 14 · 97110.1016/0036-9748(80)90367-1 ↗
2. Müetschele · Scripta Metall · 1987 · 21 · 110110.1016/0036-9748(87)90258-4 ↗
3. Young · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 633710.1016/S1359-6454(98)00333-4 ↗
4. Müetschele · Scripta Metall · 1987 · 21 · 13510.1016/0036-9748(87)90423-6 ↗
5. Harris · Metall Mater Trans A · 1991 · 22 · 35110.1007/BF02656803 ↗
6. Yao · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 11910.1016/0956-7151(91)90333-V ↗
7. Ichimura · Mater Trans JIM · 1991 · 32 · 110910.2320/matertrans1989.32.1109 ↗
8. Szpunar · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 60 · 1010710.1103/PhysRevB.60.10107 ↗
9. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 2001 · 115 · 965710.1063/1.1415500 ↗
10. Henkelman · Phys Rev Lett · 2003 · 90 · 11610110.1103/PhysRevLett.90.116101 ↗
11. Henkelman · J Chem Phys · 1999 · 111 · 701010.1063/1.480097 ↗
12. Olsen · J Chem Phys · 2004 · 121 · 200410.1063/1.1809574 ↗
13. Scully · Mater Sci Forum · 2000 · 331–337 · 158310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.331-337.1583 ↗
14. Wolverton · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 69 · 14410910.1103/PhysRevB.69.144109 ↗
15. Jacobsen · Surf Sci · 1996 · 366 · 39410.1016/0039-6028(96)00816-3 ↗
16. Jacobsen · Phys Rev B · 1987 · 35 · 742310.1103/PhysRevB.35.7423 ↗
17. Pedersen A, Henkelman G, Schiøtz J, Jónsson H. submitted for publication
18. Clarke · Phys Rev E · 1993 · 47 · 397510.1103/PhysRevE.47.3975 ↗
19. Srinivasan · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 282110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00120-2 ↗