On the possibility of rhenium clustering in nickel-based superalloys
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to elucidate the role of this element in superalloy metallurgy, the binding energy of Re–Re pairs and the stability of small Re clusters in the nickel face-centred cubic (fcc) lattice is investigated using ab initio density functional theory. It is shown that the formation of Re–Re nearest neighbour pairs is energetically unfavourable, and that this repulsive energy is dramatically reduced as soon as the solute atoms move further apart from one another. Furthermore, small nearest neighbour and second neighbour Re clusters are found to be unstable. The calculations are repeated for W and Ta, which lie beside Re in the periodic table; the results are essentially the same, except that some Ta–Ta higher order pairs have a positive binding energy, consistent with the Ni–Ta binary phase diagram exhibiting several ordered intermetallics. The predictions show that Re clusters are unstable in fcc Ni and it is unlikely that clustering has a role in improving creep and fatigue properties (the rhenium-effect) in Ni-based superalloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 2008
2. Anton · 1984 · 601
3. Giamei · Metall Mater Trans A · 1985 · 16 · 199710.1007/BF02662400 ↗
4. Reed · 2006
5. Blavette · Scripta Metall · 1986 · 20 · 139510.1016/0036-9748(86)90103-1 ↗
6. Blavette · 1988 · 305
7. Rüsing · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 46 · 23410.1016/S1359-6462(01)01231-3 ↗
8. Mottura · 2008 · 891
9. Mottura · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 93110.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.008 ↗
10. Hyde · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 44010.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.015 ↗
11. Stephenson · Microsc Res Techn · 2011 · 74 · 79910.1002/jemt.20958 ↗
12. Ge · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 96910.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.07.019 ↗
13. Koteski · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 460110.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.015 ↗
14. Mottura · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 266910.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.032 ↗
15. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 204510.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.047 ↗
16. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
17. Hafner · Comput Phys Commun · 2007 · 177 · 610.1016/j.cpc.2007.02.045 ↗
18. Blöchl · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
19. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
20. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
21. Monkhorst · Phys Rev B · 1976 · 13 · 5188519210.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
22. Wolverton · Acta Mater · 2007 · 5510.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.039 ↗
23. Wang · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38A · 56210.1007/s11661-007-9091-z ↗
24. Pollock · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 110.1016/0956-7151(92)90195-K ↗
25. Janotti · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 92 · 08590110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.085901 ↗
26. Krcmar · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 236910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.044 ↗
27. Fu · 2004 · 189