On the development of ice-templated silicon carbide scaffolds for nature-inspired structural materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The processing of ceramic scaffolds using the ice-templating, or freeze casting, technique provides a relatively simple means to mimic the hierarchical design of natural materials such as nacre. In the present study, we investigated the architecture of silicon carbide (SiC) scaffolds produced by this technique over a range of cooling rates and suspension characteristics to demonstrate its versatility and effectiveness for fabricating unidirectional porous bodies with controlled lamella thickness, porosity fraction and morphology. An array of microstructures was generated specifically to examine the role of the suspension solid load and cooling rate on the pore morphology and final ceramic fraction. With respect to the morphology of the pores, a transition from lamellar to dendritic structure was found to be triggered by an increase in cooling rate or in suspension concentration. Similarly, the freezing condition and suspension characteristics were seen to influence the transition between particle rejection and entrapment by the ice. Based on this study, the specific processing parameters that result in distinct scaffold morphologies, namely lamellar, dendritic or isotropic morphology (the latter corresponding to particle entrapment), are identified and presented in the form of a “morphology map” to establish the regions of the different architectures of freeze-cast SiC scaffolds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Sofie · J Am Ceram Soc · 2001 · 84 · 145910.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00860.x ↗
2. Araki · J Am Ceram Soc · 2001 · 87 · 185910.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb06331.x ↗
3. Araki · J Am Ceram Soc · 2004 · 87 · 201410.1111/j.1151-2916.2004.tb06353.x ↗
4. Fukasawa · J Mater Sci · 2001 · 36 · 252310.1023/A:1017946518955 ↗
5. Yokoyama · Colloid Polym Sci · 1900 · 268 · 55210.1007/BF01410297 ↗
6. Schoolf · J Cryst Growth · 2000 · 209 · 12210.1016/S0022-0248(99)00519-9 ↗
7. Fukasawa · J Am Ceram Soc · 2001 · 84 · 23010.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00638.x ↗
8. Deville · Science · 2006 · 311 · 51510.1126/science.1120937 ↗
9. Mukai · Microporous Mesoporous Mater · 2008 · 116 · 16610.1016/j.micromeso.2008.03.031 ↗
10. Harrison · J Appl Phys · 1963 · 34 · 334910.1063/1.1729191 ↗
11. Terwillinger · Chem Eng Sci · 1970 · 25 · 133110.1016/0009-2509(70)80010-0 ↗
12. Tanner · Cryobiology · 1975 · 12 · 35310.1016/0011-2240(75)90008-5 ↗
13. Worster · J Phys Chem B · 1997 · 101 · 613210.1021/jp9632448 ↗
14. Korber · J Cryst Growth · 1985 · 72 · 64910.1016/0022-0248(85)90217-9 ↗
15. Casses · Adv Colloid Interface Sci · 1994 · 50 · 10310.1016/0001-8686(94)80027-8 ↗
16. Zhang · Nat Mater · 2005 · 4 · 78710.1038/nmat1487 ↗
17. Munch · J Am Ceram Soc · 2009 · 92 · 153410.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03087.x ↗
18. Deville · Adv Eng Mater · 2008 · 10 · 15510.1002/adem.200700270 ↗
19. Pekor · J Am Ceram Soc · 2008 · 91 · 318510.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02616.x ↗
20. Deville · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 196510.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.003 ↗
21. Deville · J Am Ceram Soc · 2010 · 93 · 250710.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03840.x ↗
22. Preiss · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2012 · 32 · 157510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.12.031 ↗
23. Lasalle · J Am Ceram Soc · 2012 · 95 · 79910.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04993.x ↗
24. Li · Intl Mater Rev · 2012 · 57 · 3710.1179/1743280411Y.0000000011 ↗
25. Wegst · Philos Mag · 2004 · 84 · 216710.1080/14786430410001680935 ↗
26. Wang · Mater Sci Eng C · 2009 · 11 · 910.1016/S0928-4931(00)00133-8 ↗
27. Munch · Science · 2008 · 5 · 151610.1126/science.1164865 ↗
28. Tang · Key Eng Mater · 2005 · 280–283 · 128710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.280-283.1287 ↗
29. Yoon · J Am Ceram Soc · 2007 · 90 · 175310.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01703.x ↗
30. Greskovich · J Am Ceram Soc · 1976 · 59 · 33610.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb10979.x ↗
31. Lange · J Mater Sci · 1975 · 10 · 31410.1007/BF00540356 ↗
32. Omori · J Mater Sci · 1988 · 23 · 374410.1007/BF00540522 ↗
33. Mulla · J Mater Sci · 1994 · 29 · 93410.1007/BF00351412 ↗
34. She · Mater Res Bull · 1999 · 34 · 162910.1016/S0025-5408(99)00172-5 ↗
35. Castillo-Rodriguez · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2006 · 26 · 239710.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.04.018 ↗
36. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 443 · 25710.1016/j.msea.2006.08.047 ↗
37. Nader · J Mater Sci · 1999 · 34 · 119710.1023/A:1004552704872 ↗
38. Eom · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2012 · 32 · 128310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2011.11.040 ↗
39. Gilbert · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 319910.1016/1359-6454(95)00409-2 ↗
40. Rao · Ceram Intl · 1999 · 25 · 22310.1016/S0272-8842(98)00027-3 ↗
41. Waschkies · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 512510.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.046 ↗
42. Wegst · Phil Trans Roy Soc A · 2010 · 368 · 209910.1098/rsta.2010.0014 ↗
43. Waschkies · J Am Ceram Soc · 2009 · 92 · S7910.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02673.x ↗
44. Bareggi · J Am Ceram Soc · 2011 · 94 · 357010.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04572.x ↗
45. Deville · J Am Ceram Soc · 2009 · 92 · 248910.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03163.x ↗
46. Muller · Proc Roy Soc A · 2010 · 466 · 120110.1098/rspa.2009.0445 ↗
47. Deville · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2011 · 31 · 98310.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2010.12.021 ↗
48. Launey · J Roy Soc Interface · 2010 · 7 · 74110.1098/rsif.2009.0331 ↗