journal article·2012-04

3-D phase-field simulation of grain growth: Topological analysis versus mean-field approximations

Reza Darvishi Kamachali, Ingo Steinbach

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

The characteristics of 3-D grain growth are investigated by a topological analysis of phase-field simulation results compared with theoretical mean-field theories. We found that the size distribution of the grains starting from an arbitrary narrow distribution crosses the self-similar Hillert distribution, and ends in a distribution with relatively longer tails of large grains in which the central peak shifted towards smaller grain size. The distribution of topological classes, as characterized by the number of facets per grain, is found to be time-invariant for the process as a whole. The obtained shape function is in good agreement with the analytical distribution function derived based on the average N-hedron model [Rios PR, Glicksman ME. Act Mater 2008;56:1165]. The volumetric growth rate per topological class also correlates well with the analytical approach obtained by Mullins [Mullins WW. Acta Mater 1956;3:900]. The relationship between grain size and its shape, however, deviates from theoretical predictions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Blikstein · Mater Res · 1999 · 2 · 13310.1590/S1516-14391999000300004 ↗
2. Wakai · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 129710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00405-X ↗
3. Frost · Curr Opin Sol Stat Mater Sci · 1996 · 1 · 36110.1016/S1359-0286(96)80026-X ↗
4. Weygand · Philos Mag B · 1998 · 78 · 32910.1080/13642819808206731 ↗
5. Liu · Scrip Mater · 1996 · 34 · 167910.1016/1359-6462(96)00055-3 ↗
6. Fan · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 61110.1016/S1359-6454(96)00200-5 ↗
7. Krill · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 3057
8. Burke · Prog Metal Phys · 1952 · 3 · 22010.1016/0502-8205(52)90009-9 ↗
9. Mullins · Acta Mater · 1956 · 3 · 900
10. Atkinson · Acta Mater · 1988 · 36 · 46910.1016/0001-6160(88)90079-X ↗
11. Mullins · Acta Metall · 1989 · 37 · 297910.1016/0001-6160(89)90333-7 ↗
12. Hilgenfeldt · Phys Rev Lett · 2001 · 86 · 268510.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2685 ↗
13. MacPherson · Acta Mater · 2007 · 446 · 1053
14. Mullins · J App Phys · 1986 · 59 · 134110.1063/1.336528 ↗
15. Steinbach · Physica D · 1999 · 134 · 38510.1016/S0167-2789(99)00129-3 ↗
16. Guo · Int J Mater Res · 2010 · 101 · 48010.3139/146.110298 ↗
17. Guo · Physica D · 2011 · 240 · 38210.1016/j.physd.2010.09.014 ↗
18. Hillert · Acta Metall · 1965 · 13 · 22710.1016/0001-6160(65)90200-2 ↗
19. Lifshitz · J Phys Chem Solids · 1961 · 19 · 3510.1016/0022-3697(61)90054-3 ↗
20. Lucke · Acta Metall · 1992 · 40 · 53310.1016/0956-7151(92)90402-Z ↗
21. Louat · Phil Mag A · 1994 · 69 · 84110.1080/01418619408242523 ↗
22. Pande · Acta Metall · 1987 · 35 · 267110.1016/0001-6160(87)90266-5 ↗
23. Glicksman · Philos Mag · 2005 · 85 · 310.1080/14786430412331329892 ↗
24. Rios · Act Mater · 2006 · 54 · 104110.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.027 ↗
25. Rios · Act Mater · 2007 · 55 · 156510.1016/j.actamat.2006.10.017 ↗
26. Rios · Act Mater · 2008 · 56 · 116510.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.010 ↗
27. Steinbach · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 07300110.1088/0965-0393/17/7/073001 ↗
28. http://www.openphase.de.
29. Kim · Phys Rev E · 2006 · 74 · 06160510.1103/PhysRevE.74.061605 ↗
30. Barraless Mora · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 591510.1016/j.actamat.2008.08.006 ↗
31. Lazar · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 683710.1016/j.actamat.2011.07.052 ↗
32. Feltham · Acta Metall · 1957 · 5 · 9710.1016/0001-6160(57)90136-0 ↗