Molecular dynamics simulations of compression–tension asymmetry in plasticity of Fe nanopillars
Source abstract
Abstract
Tension-compression asymmetry is a notable feature of plasticity in bcc single crystals. Recent experiments reveal striking differences in the plasticity of bcc nanopillars for tension and compression. Here we present results from molecular dynamics simulations of nanopillars of bcc Fe in tension and compression. We find that a totally different deformation mechanism applies in each cases: dislocation glide in compression and twinning in tension. This difference explains experimentally-observed asymmetry in the nanopillar morphology.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
2. Jang · Nat Nano · 2012 · 7 · 59410.1038/nnano.2012.116 ↗
3. Kim · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 524510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.027 ↗
4. Kim · Int J Plast · 2012 · 28 · 4610.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.015 ↗
5. Kim · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 235510.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.022 ↗
6. Kim · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 30010.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.04.012 ↗
7. Taylor · Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser A · 1926 · 112 · 33710.1098/rspa.1926.0116 ↗
8. Christian · Metall Mater Trans A · 1983 · 14 · 123710.1007/BF02664806 ↗
9. Hollang · Phys Status Solidi (a) · 1997 · 160 · 32910.1002/1521-396X(199704)160:2<329::AID-PSSA329>3.0.CO;2-O ↗
10. Hull · 1985
11. Duesbery · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 148110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00367-4 ↗
12. Ito · Philos Mag A · 2001 · 81 · 138710.1080/01418610108214447 ↗
13. Groger · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 541210.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.037 ↗
14. Groger · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 542610.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.027 ↗
15. Ackland · Comput Phys Commun · 2011 · 182 · 258710.1016/j.cpc.2011.07.014 ↗
16. Zhang · J Mater Sci Technol · 2012 · 28 · 16410.1016/S1005-0302(12)60037-1 ↗
17. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 402910.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.001 ↗
18. Engin · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · 16 · 03500510.1088/0965-0393/16/3/035005 ↗
19. Mendelev · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
20. Zhu · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 888710.1103/PhysRevB.45.8887 ↗
21. Amador · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 187010.1103/PhysRevB.46.1870 ↗
22. Sandoval · Nanotechnology · 2009 · 20 · 32570410.1088/0957-4484/20/32/325704 ↗
23. Meyer · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 57 · 514010.1103/PhysRevB.57.5140 ↗
24. Li · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 82 · 20543510.1103/PhysRevB.82.205435 ↗
25. Nose · J Chem Phys · 1984 · 81 · 51110.1063/1.447334 ↗
26. Hoover · Phys Rev A · 1985 · 31 · 169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
27. Li · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · 11 · 17310.1088/0965-0393/11/2/305 ↗
28. Stukowski · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 18 · 01501210.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
29. Stukowski · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 18 · 08500110.1088/0965-0393/18/8/085001 ↗
30. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
31. Shimizu · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 292310.2320/matertrans.MJ200769 ↗
32. Brown · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 88610.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.003 ↗
33. Li · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 07544410.1103/PhysRevB.79.075444 ↗