Role of diffusion anisotropy in β-Sn in microstructural evolution of Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu flip chip bumps undergoing electromigration
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The anisotropy of β-Sn grain is becoming the most crucial factor to dominate the electromigration (EM) behavior with the downsizing of solder bumps. When the c-axis of β-Sn grain is parallel to the electron flow direction, excessive dissolution of cathode Cu occurs due to the large diffusivity of Cu along the c-axis; when the c-axis of β-Sn grain is perpendicular to the electron flow direction, limited dissolution of cathode Cu occurs even in the current crowding regions. However, there is no evident dissolution of cathode Ni regardless of the orientation of β-Sn grains, due to the protection of a stable interfacial (Cu,Ni)6Sn5 intermetallic compound (IMC) layer and the extremely low solubility of Ni in β-Sn. Cu6Sn5-type protrusions selectively precipitated in specific Sn grains with small angle θ (between the c-axis of Sn grain and electron flow direction) but not in the neighbor grains with large angle θ or along the direction of c-axis of β-Sn. Sn hillocks are squeezed out to relieve the compressive stress generated by the formation of Cu6Sn5-type IMCs. The high diffusion anisotropy in β-Sn grains, which is calculated by a proposed model, accounts for the novel diffusion behavior of solute atoms, dissolution of cathode and consequent precipitation of IMCs in Ni/Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu/Cu flip chip solder joints.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties · Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Tu · Microelectron. Reliab. · 2011 · 51 · 51710.1016/j.microrel.2010.09.031 ↗
2. Park · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 714210.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.016 ↗
3. Huang · J. Mater. Res. · 2014 · 29 · 255610.1557/jmr.2014.231 ↗
4. Han · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 10210.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.023 ↗
5. Kim · J. Alloys Compd. · 2003 · 352 · 22610.1016/S0925-8388(02)01166-0 ↗
6. Lu · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2008 · 92 · 21190910.1063/1.2936996 ↗
7. Seo · J. Electron. Mater. · 2009 · 38 · 246110.1007/s11664-009-0902-4 ↗
8. Chao · Acta Mater. · 2007 · 55 · 280510.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.019 ↗
9. Dyson · J. Appl. Phys. · 1967 · 37 · 340810.1063/1.1710127 ↗
10. Yeh · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1984 · 53 · 146910.1103/PhysRevLett.53.1469 ↗
11. Huang · Phys. Rev. B · 1974 · 9 · 147910.1103/PhysRevB.9.1479 ↗
12. Huang · Scr. Mater. · 2014 · 80 · 3710.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.02.010 ↗
13. Yang · J. Alloys Compd. · 2015 · 627 · 28110.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.222 ↗
14. Lee · J. Mater. Res. · 2011 · 26 · 46710.1557/jmr.2010.86 ↗
15. Gan · J. Appl. Phys. · 2005 · 97 · 06351410.1063/1.1861151 ↗
16. Shi · J. Phys. Chem. Solids · 1987 · 48 · 69310.1016/0022-3697(87)90060-6 ↗
17. Chao · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 08490910.1063/1.2359135 ↗
18. Liu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2006 · 100 · 08370210.1063/1.2357860 ↗
19. Hsiao · Scr. Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 6110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.10.031 ↗
20. Liu · J. Electron. Mater. · 2011 · 40 · 191210.1007/s11664-011-1666-1 ↗
21. Saunders · Bull. Alloy Phase Diagr. · 1990 · 11 · 27810.1007/BF03029299 ↗
22. T.B. Massalski, H. Okamoto, P.R. Subramanian, L. Kacprzak, Binary Alloy Phase Diagram, second ed., New York, 2001.
23. Jiang · J. Electron. Mater. · 2012 · 41 · 208310.1007/s11664-012-2124-4 ↗