journal article·2007-12

Indentation size effect in Ni–Fe solid solutions

K. Durst, O. Franke, A. Böhner, M. Göken

Acta Materialia· Volume 55· Issue 20
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The indentation size effect observed during indentation testing is studied in pure Ni, Fe and two different Ni–Fe alloys as well as in a Ni–Fe diffusion couple. The hardness as a function of depth in these solid solutions is modeled in terms of geometrically necessary dislocations (GND). It is found that, for indentation depths varying from 50 to 5000 nm, the depth dependence of hardness could be modeled with a parameter f . Parameter f allows scaling of the storage volume of GND with indentation depth, thus yielding the effective contribution of GND to the hardness in a specific alloy. For the alloy studied, parameter f decreases with solid solution strengthening. Frictional stresses or changes in stacking fault energy might reduce the storage volume for GND. Using these observations, it is shown that diffusion couples and nanoindentation allow macroscopic solid solution hardening to be determined in a combinatorial manner.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Durst · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 387
2. Delince´ · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 339510.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.031 ↗
3. Zhao · J Mater Res · 2001 · 16 · 156510.1557/JMR.2001.0218 ↗
4. Han · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 205910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.017 ↗
5. Poole · Scripta Mater · 1996 · 34 · 55910.1016/1359-6462(95)00524-2 ↗
6. Ma · J Mater Res · 1995 · 10 · 85310.1557/JMR.1995.0853 ↗
7. Stelmashenko · Acta Metall Mater · 1993 · 41 · 285510.1016/0956-7151(93)90100-7 ↗
8. Yang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 84910.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.004 ↗
9. Liu · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 23710.1016/S1359-6462(00)00598-4 ↗
10. Durst · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 109310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.02.009 ↗
11. Bahr · J Mater Res · 2005 · 20 · 194710.1557/JMR.2005.0244 ↗
12. Nix · Mech Phys Solids · 1998 · 46 · 41110.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
13. Feng · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 59910.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.05.034 ↗
14. Huang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 166810.1016/j.jmps.2006.02.002 ↗
15. Durst · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 254710.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.036 ↗
16. Neuhäuser · 1993 · vol. 6
17. Atkins · J Mech Phys Solids · 1965 · 13 · 14910.1016/0022-5096(65)90018-9 ↗
18. Backes · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 554110.1080/14786430600735468 ↗
19. Fleck · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 2 · 47510.1016/0956-7151(94)90502-9 ↗
20. Ashby · Philos Mag · 1970 · 21 · 39910.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
21. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 280110.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.024 ↗
22. Zaafarani · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 186310.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.014 ↗
23. Johnson · 1985
24. Taylor · J Inst Metals · 1938 · 62 · 307
25. Tabor · 1951
26. Mueller · Mater Sci Forum · 2006 · 31 · 503
27. Oliver · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 310.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 ↗
28. G.M. Pharr, personal communication; 2006.
29. Argon · Acta Metall · 1966 · 14 · 144910.1016/0001-6160(66)90165-9 ↗