journal article·2010-10

Mechanisms of Guinier–Preston zone hardening in the athermal limit

C.V. Singh, D.H. Warner

Acta Materialia· Volume 58· Issue 17
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The interaction of dislocations with Guinier–Preston (GP) zones is a process that contributes to the yield strength of many underaged precipitate-strengthened alloys. Here we use atomistic modeling to investigate this process in an Al–Cu alloy using a newly developed interatomic potential. The study focuses on edge dislocation interactions in the athermal limit. The critical shear stress and the mechanism by which dislocations overcome GP zones is found to vary significantly depending upon GP zone size, orientation and offset from the dislocation glide plane. Dislocation cutting, looping, leading partial cutting with trailing partial looping, diffusionless climb and defect nucleation at the dislocation–GP zone contact point are all observed. In the majority of cases dislocation looping is the controlling mechanism, challenging the applicability of traditional continuum dislocation cutting models to the underaged Al–Cu system at 0 K.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Guinier · Ann Phys · 1939 · 12 · 16110.1051/anphys/193911120161 ↗
2. Preston · Philos Mag · 1938 · 26 · 85510.1080/14786443808562177 ↗
3. Mott NF. Nabarro FRN. In: Report of a conference on strength of solids. London: The Physical Society; 1948. p. 1.
4. Gerold · Phys Status Solidi · 1966 · 16 · 67510.1002/pssb.19660160234 ↗
5. Knowles · 1971 · 9
6. Nembach · Phys Status Solidi (a) · 1983 · 78 · 57110.1002/pssa.2210780223 ↗
7. Hirsch · Philos Mag · 1965 · 12 · 88110.1080/14786436508228118 ↗
8. Kelly · 1963 · 947
9. Kelly · Acta Metall · 1957 · 5 · 36510.1016/0001-6160(57)90003-2 ↗
10. Harkness · Met Trans · 1970 · 1 · 4310.1007/BF02819240 ↗
11. Brown · 1971 · 9
12. Eto · Scripta Metall · 1980 · 14 · 13310.1016/0036-9748(80)90141-6 ↗
13. Muraishi · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 275510.1080/01418610208240064 ↗
14. Osetsky · J Nucl Mater · 2003 · 323 · 26810.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.08.028 ↗
15. Chen · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 18410410.1103/PhysRevB.80.184104 ↗
16. Shim · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 02190610.1063/1.2429902 ↗
17. Terentyev · Acta Mater · 2008 · 322910.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.004 ↗
18. van der Giessen · Model Simul Mater Sci · 1995 · 3 · 68910.1088/0965-0393/3/5/008 ↗
19. Plimpton · J Compos Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
20. Apostle F, Mishin Y; unpublished.
21. Daw · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 29 · 644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
22. Mishin · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 402910.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.001 ↗
23. Hono · Philos Mag A · 1986 · 53 · 49510.1080/01418618608242848 ↗
24. Karlik · Ultramicroscopy · 2004 · 98 · 21910.1016/j.ultramic.2003.08.015 ↗
25. Orowan · 1948 · 451
26. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
27. Li · Model Simul Mater Sci · 2003 · 11 · 17310.1088/0965-0393/11/2/305 ↗
28. Karlik · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 325110.1016/S1359-6454(97)00003-7 ↗
29. Ringer · Mater Charact · 2000 · 44 · 10110.1016/S1044-5803(99)00051-0 ↗
30. Konno · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 230310.1016/S1359-6462(01)00909-5 ↗
31. Hull · 2001
32. Martin · 1998
33. Dieter · 1986
34. Silcock · J Inst Met · 1953 · 82 · 239
35. Chakravarthy · J Mech Phys Solids · 2010 · 58 · 62510.1016/j.jmps.2010.03.004 ↗