Influence of severe plastic deformation on dynamic strain aging of ultrafine grained Al–Mg alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This investigation addressed the influence of severe plastic deformation (SPD) on dynamic strain aging (DSA) of ultrafine grained (UFG) Al–Mg alloys with different Mg content. Confined channel die pressing (CCDP) carried out at room temperature was used for SPD. Microcharacterization by TEM revealed a remarkable grain refinement and retarded dynamic recovery with increasing Mg content and plastic strain during SPD. Mechanical tests with jumping and constant strain rates demonstrated a complicated deformation behaviors of the UFG Al–Mg alloys: (i) the critical strain e c for initiation of serrated flow increased considerably with increasing strain and Mg content contrary to the behavior of the coarse grained and non-deformed counterparts; (ii) the instantaneous stress response (Δ σ i ) and the instantaneous strain rate sensitivity ( m i ) during rate jumps were always positive and increased monotonically with CCDP pass and Mg content, however, they exhibited a distinctive asymmetry with respect to the strain rate jump direction, i.e. the values for strain rate towards down were about one order of magnitude larger than those for rate towards up and increased with progressing CCDP as well as with increasing Mg content; (iii) the steady state strain rate sensitivity m s was negative and decreased firstly with progressing CCDP up to a certain strain and then increased again. This mechanical behavior of UFG Al–Mg alloys is discussed on the basis of recently developed DSA models by relating the microstructure evolution of Al–Mg alloys during SPD to the influence of SPD on DSA.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Cottrell · Phila Mag · 1953 · 44 · 3
2. Cottrell · Proc Phys Soc · 1948 · 62 · 14
3. Curtin · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 87510.1038/nmat1765 ↗
4. Van den Beukel · Acta Metall · 1982 · 30 · 102710.1016/0001-6160(82)90211-5 ↗
5. Van den Brink · Phys Status Solidi A · 1975 · 30 · 46910.1002/pssa.2210300205 ↗
6. Van den Beukel · Phys Status Solidi A · 1975 · 30 · 19710.1002/pssa.2210300120 ↗
7. Van den Beukel · Acta Metall · 1980 · 28 · 96510.1016/0001-6160(80)90114-5 ↗
8. Kocks · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 62310.1016/0001-6160(85)90026-4 ↗
9. Mulford · Scr Metall · 1979 · 13 · 72910.1016/0036-9748(79)90145-5 ↗
10. Wycliffe · Scr Metall · 1980 · 14 · 134910.1016/0036-9748(80)90193-3 ↗
11. Sleeswyk · Acta Metall · 1958 · 6 · 59810.1016/0001-6160(58)90101-9 ↗
12. Kubin · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 69710.1016/0956-7151(90)90021-8 ↗
13. Brechet · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 95510.1016/0956-7151(94)00334-E ↗
14. Kubin · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 270710.1016/0001-6160(88)90117-4 ↗
15. Kubin · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 103710.1016/0956-7151(92)90081-O ↗
16. Balik · Acta Metall Mater · 1993 · 41 · 144710.1016/0956-7151(93)90253-O ↗
17. Balik · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2001 · 316 · 10210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01223-0 ↗
18. Hähner · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 338510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00122-8 ↗
19. Rizzi · Int J Plast · 2004 · 20 · 12110.1016/S0749-6419(03)00035-4 ↗
20. Hähner · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 369510.1016/S1359-6454(97)00066-9 ↗
21. Soare · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 409110.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.030 ↗
22. Soare · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 404610.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.027 ↗
23. Picu · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 344710.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.042 ↗
24. Picu · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2005 · 390 · 33410.1016/j.msea.2004.08.029 ↗
25. Picu · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 16110.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.002 ↗
26. Fu · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 665010.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.035 ↗
27. Cai · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2010 · 527 · 515710.1016/j.msea.2010.04.096 ↗
28. Kapoor · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 540810.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.049 ↗
29. Kapoor · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 138910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.08.026 ↗
30. Blum · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2007 · 462 · 27510.1016/j.msea.2006.05.171 ↗
31. Zhang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 669510.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.034 ↗
32. Zhang S. [Master Thesis]. RWTH Aachen University; 2010.
33. Hughes · Acta Metall Mater · 1993 · 41 · 142110.1016/0956-7151(93)90251-M ↗
34. Gubicaza · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2004 · 387–389 · 5510.1016/j.msea.2004.03.076 ↗
35. Morris · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 404710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00203-3 ↗
36. Hayes · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 425910.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.042 ↗
37. Witkin · Metall Mater Trans A · 2006 · 37A · 18510.1007/s11661-006-0163-2 ↗
38. Han · Adv Eng Mater · 2006 · 8 · 94510.1002/adem.200600164 ↗
39. Rupert · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 161910.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.026 ↗
40. McCormic · Acta Metall · 1972 · 20 · 35110.1016/0001-6160(72)90028-4 ↗
41. Wei · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2004 · 381 · 7110.1016/j.msea.2004.03.064 ↗
42. Roters · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 418110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00289-5 ↗
43. Gottstein · 2004
44. Meyers · Prog Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
45. Fujita · Mater Sci Eng, A · 2004 · 371 · 24110.1016/j.msea.2003.12.042 ↗