Micropillar and macropillar compression responses of magnesium single crystals oriented for single slip or extension twinning
Source abstract
Abstract
Uniaxial compression experiments were conducted on two magnesium (Mg) single crystals whose crystallographic orientations facilitate the deformation either by basal slip or by extension twinning. Specimen size effects were examined by conducting experiments on mu m- and mm-sized samples. A marked specimen size effect was noticed, with micropillars exhibiting significantly higher flow stress than bulk samples. Further, it is observed that the twin nucleation stress exerts strong size dependence, with micropillars requiring substantially higher stress than the bulk samples. The flow curves obtained on the bulk samples are smooth whereas those obtained from micropillars exhibit intermittent and precipitous stress drops. Electron backscattered diffraction and microstructural analyses of the deformed samples reveal that the plastic deformation in basal slip oriented crystals occurs only by slip while twin oriented crystals deform by both slip and twinning modes. The twin oriented crystals exhibit a higher strain hardening during plastic deformation when compared to the single slip oriented crystals. The strain hardening rate, theta, of twin oriented crystals is considerably greater in micropillars compared to the bulk single crystals, suggesting the prevalence of different work hardening mechanisms at these different sample sizes. (C) 2013 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Easton · J Met · 2008 · 11 · 57
2. Caceres · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38 · 164910.1007/s11661-007-9156-z ↗
3. Kulekci · Adv Manuf Technol · 2008 · 39 · 85110.1007/s00170-007-1279-2 ↗
4. Groves · Philos Mag · 1963 · 8 · 87710.1080/14786436308213843 ↗
5. Graff · Int J Plast · 2007 · 23 · 195710.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.009 ↗
6. Kalidindi · J Mech Phys Solids · 1998 · 46 · 26710.1016/S0022-5096(97)00051-3 ↗
7. Zhang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2012 · 60 · 94510.1016/j.jmps.2012.01.005 ↗
8. Yoo · Metall Trans A · 1981 · 12 · 40910.1007/BF02648537 ↗
9. Munroe · Scripta Mater · 1997 · 36 · 138310.1016/S1359-6462(97)00048-1 ↗
10. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
11. Reed-Hill · Trans AIME · 1957 · 209 · 496
12. Reed-Hill · Acta Metall · 1957 · 5 · 71710.1016/0001-6160(57)90074-3 ↗
13. Wonsiewicz BC. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1966.
14. Wonsiewicz · Trans Metall Soc AIME · 1967 · 239 · 1422
15. Kelly · Trans Metall Soc AIME · 1968 · 242 · 5
16. Obara · Acta Metall · 1973 · 21 · 84510.1016/0001-6160(73)90141-7 ↗
17. Yoshinaga · Mater Sci Eng · 1973 · 12 · 25510.1016/0025-5416(73)90036-0 ↗
18. Kitahara · Key Eng Mater · 2007 · 345 · 12910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.345-346.129 ↗
19. Syed · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 70010.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.036 ↗
20. Chapuis · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 198610.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.064 ↗
21. Li · Mater Sci Eng A · 2013 · 568 · 9610.1016/j.msea.2013.01.028 ↗
22. Bhattacharya · Philos Mag · 2011 · 91 · 222710.1080/14786435.2011.555783 ↗
23. Lilleodden · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 53210.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.048 ↗
24. Byer · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 53610.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.017 ↗
25. Yu · Nano Lett · 2012 · 12 · 88710.1021/nl203937t ↗
26. Ye · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 29210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.09.047 ↗
27. Byer · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 380810.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.019 ↗
28. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
29. Dehm · Prog Mater Sci · 2009 · 54 · 66410.1016/j.pmatsci.2009.03.005 ↗
30. Greer · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
31. Uchic · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 2009 · 39 · 36110.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145422 ↗
32. Volkert · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 103 · 08353910.1063/1.2884584 ↗
33. Volkert · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 556710.1080/14786430600567739 ↗
34. Schuster · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 509110.1016/j.actamat.2008.06.028 ↗
35. Dubach · J Mater Res · 2009 · 24 · 269710.1557/jmr.2009.0304 ↗
36. Zhang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 18110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.043 ↗
37. Rabe · Thin Solid Films · 2004 · 469 · 20610.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.096 ↗
38. Tsivinsky · Kris Tech · 1975 · 10 · 510.1002/crat.19750100102 ↗
39. Barnett · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 464 · 110.1016/j.msea.2006.12.037 ↗
40. Proust · Int J Plast · 2009 · 25 · 86110.1016/j.ijplas.2008.05.005 ↗
41. Hong · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 587310.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.002 ↗
42. Knezevic · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 623010.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.041 ↗
43. Barnett · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 509310.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.015 ↗
44. Sedlmayr · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 398510.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.018 ↗
45. Koike · Metall Mater Trans A · 2005 · 36A · 168910.1007/s11661-005-0032-4 ↗
46. Vaidya · Acta Mater · 1980 · 28 · 112310.1016/0001-6160(80)90095-4 ↗
47. Dimiduk · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 406510.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.023 ↗
48. Schneider · Phys Rev Lett · 2009 · 10550110.1103/PhysRevLett.103.105501 ↗
49. Bei · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 476210.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.030 ↗
50. Benzerga · Int J Plast · 2008 · 24 · 112810.1016/j.ijplas.2007.08.010 ↗
51. Rao · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 324510.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.011 ↗
52. Senger · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 58710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.11.031 ↗
53. Parthasarathy · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 31310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.09.016 ↗
54. Mahajan · Scripta Mater · 2013 · 68 · 9510.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.09.011 ↗
55. Wang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 552110.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.047 ↗
56. Serra · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 446510.1016/0956-7151(95)00128-I ↗
57. Niewczas · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 584810.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.059 ↗