High-throughput thermal conductivity measurements of nickel solid solutions and the applicability of the Wiedemann–Franz law
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Thermal conductivity mapping with a spatial resolution of 3 μm and an acquisition speed of 3 points per second has been applied to binary Ni(Cr), Ni(Pd), Ni(Pt), Ni(Rh) and Ni(Ru) solid solutions to test the applicability of the Smith–Palmer equation and the Wiedemann–Franz law to Ni alloys. The lattice thermal conductivity of pure Ni and Ni(Pd) alloys is calculated by molecular dynamics. After subtracting the lattice component from the total thermal conductivity, the electronic thermal conductivity of pure Ni is 25% smaller than that predicted from the Wiedemann–Franz law. With the addition of solutes of Pt and Rh, the deviation from the Wiedemann–Franz law decreases. However, the negative deviation of the electronic thermal conductivity of Ni(Pd) alloys from the Wiedemann–Franz law increases slightly to 29% when the Pd concentration is 40 at.%. The Smith–Palmer equation is not a generally reliable method for predicting the thermal conductivity of Ni solid solution alloys from measurements of the electrical conductivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Thermal properties of materials · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Pollock · Acta Metall Mater · 1992 · 40 · 110.1016/0956-7151(92)90195-K ↗
2. Darolia · J Met · 1991 · 43 · 44
3. Klemens · Inter Met Rev · 1986 · 31 · 19710.1179/095066086790324294 ↗
4. Ho · J Phys Chem Ref Data · 1978 · 7 · 95910.1063/1.555583 ↗
5. Terada · J Appl Phys · 1997 · 81 · 226310.1063/1.364254 ↗
6. Smith · Trans AIME · 1935 · 117 · 225
7. Powell · 1965 · 277
8. Powell · J Less Common Met · 1961 · 3 · 22610.1016/0022-5088(61)90064-9 ↗
9. Fine · Trans AIME · 1950 · 188 · 951
10. Olafsson · J Mater Sci · 1997 · 32 · 438310.1023/A:1018680024876 ↗
11. Kittel · 1976
12. Huxtable · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 29810.1038/nmat1114 ↗
13. Zheng · Adv Eng Mater · 2005 · 7 · 62210.1002/adem.200500024 ↗
14. Zhao · Adv Eng Mater · 2001 · 3 · 14310.1002/1527-2648(200103)3:3<143::AID-ADEM143>3.0.CO;2-F ↗
15. Zhao · J Mater Res · 2001 · 16 · 156510.1557/JMR.2001.0218 ↗
16. Paddock · J Appl Phys · 1986 · 60 · 28510.1063/1.337642 ↗
17. Cahill · J Heat Transfer · 2002 · 124 · 22310.1115/1.1454111 ↗
18. Cahill · Rev Sci Instrum · 2004 · 75 · 511910.1063/1.1819431 ↗
19. Cahill · Phys Rev B · 2004 · 70 · 23532210.1103/PhysRevB.70.235322 ↗
20. Schelling · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 14430610.1103/PhysRevB.65.144306 ↗
21. Touloukian · 1970 · vol. 1
22. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1989 · 40 · 590910.1103/PhysRevB.40.5909 ↗
23. Daw · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 29 · 644310.1103/PhysRevB.29.6443 ↗
24. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
25. Meyer · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 57 · 514010.1103/PhysRevB.57.5140 ↗
26. Owen · Proc Phys Soc · 1937 · 49 · 32310.1088/0959-5309/49/3/314 ↗
27. Leadbetter · J Phys C (Proc Phys Soc) · 1968 · 1 · 148110.1088/0022-3719/1/6/304 ↗
28. Touloukian · 1970 · vol. 4
29. Seitz · 1940
30. 2004
31. Bisson · J Am Ceram Soc · 2000 · 83 · 199310.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01502.x ↗
32. Cahill · Phys Rev B · 1987 · 35 · 406710.1103/PhysRevB.35.4067 ↗
33. Norbury · Trans Faraday Soc · 1921 · 16 · 57010.1039/tf9211600570 ↗
34. Linde · Ann Phys (Leipzig) · 1931 · 10 · 5210.1002/andp.19314020104 ↗
35. 1992
36. Vetter · Phys Status Solidi (a) · 1981 · 63 · 63710.1002/pssa.2210630231 ↗