journal article·2014-06

Stability of MX-type strengthening nanoprecipitates in ferritic steels under thermal aging, stress and ion irradiation

L. Tan, T.S. Byun, Y. Katoh, L.L. Snead

Acta Materialia· Volume 71
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The stability of MX-type precipitates is critical to retain mechanical properties of both reduced activation ferritic–martensitic (RAFM) and conventional FM steels at elevated temperatures above ∼500 °C. The stability of TaC, TaN and VN nanoprecipitates under thermal aging (600 and 700 °C), creep (600 °C) and ion irradiation (Fe ion, 500 °C) conditions was systematically studied in this work. The statistical particle evolution in density and size was characterized using transmission electron microscopy. Nanoprecipitate stability under the studied conditions manifested differently through either dissolution, reprecipitation, growth or fragmentation, with TaC exhibiting the greatest stability followed by VN and TaN in sequence. Nanoprecipitate evolution phenomena and mechanisms and the apparent disagreement of this interpretation with published literature on the subject are discussed. These findings not only help understanding the degradation mechanisms of RAFM and conventional FM steels at elevated temperatures and under stress and irradiation, but should also prove beneficial to the development of advanced RAFM steels.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Microstructure and mechanical properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Zinkle · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 73510.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 ↗
2. Tan · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 422 · 4510.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.12.011 ↗
3. Klueh · Metall Trans A · 1989 · 20 · 46310.1007/BF02653926 ↗
4. Klueh · J Mater Eng · 1989 · 11 · 16910.1007/BF02834465 ↗
5. Klueh · J Nucl Mater · 2008 · 378 · 15910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.05.010 ↗
6. Li · Metall Mater Trans A · 2006 · 37 · 8910.1007/s11661-006-0155-2 ↗
7. Tavassoli · Fusion Eng Des · 2002 · 61–62 · 61710.1016/S0920-3796(02)00255-7 ↗
8. Magnusson · Metall Mater Trans A · 2007 · 38 · 242810.1007/s11661-007-9280-9 ↗
9. Prat · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 614210.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.033 ↗
10. Tamura · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 329 · 32810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.046 ↗
11. Kabadwal · Metall Mater Trans A · 2010 · 41 · 36410.1007/s11661-009-0094-9 ↗
12. Tanigawa · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 367–370 · 13210.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.155 ↗
13. Tanigawa · Mater Trans · 2005 · 46 · 46910.2320/matertrans.46.469 ↗
14. Tan · J Nucl Mater · 2014 · 445 · 10410.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.11.003 ↗
15. Ribis · J Nucl Mater · 2013 · 434 · 17810.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.11.038 ↗
16. Williams · 2009
17. Image processing and analysis in Java – ImageJ. .
18. Oruganti · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 214510.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.015 ↗
19. Fultz · 2008
20. Russell · J Nucl Mater · 1993 · 206 · 12910.1016/0022-3115(93)90120-N ↗
21. Frost · 1983 · 75
22. Blakeman ED. Neutron and gamma fluxes and dpa rates for HFIR vessel beltline region (present and upgrade designs). ORNL/TM-13693. Oak Ridge National Laboratory; November 2000.10.2172/777683 ↗
23. Wang · J Nucl Mater · 2013 · 440 · 8110.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.063 ↗
24. Lucas · J Nucl Mater · 1993 · 206 · 28710.1016/0022-3115(93)90129-M ↗