Measurement and modelling of the nanoindentation response of shape memory alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract A nickel–titanium shape memory alloy was subjected to nanoindentation over a range of temperature (up to 200 °C), such that the starting material was either predominantly martensitic or largely composed of the parent phase. The load–displacement data were interpreted to give information about whether the imposed strain was being at least partly accommodated by the martensitic phase transformation, i.e. whether superelastic deformation was taking place. This interpretation was assisted by finite element simulation of the evolving strain field under an indenter, with or without the superelastic deformation mechanism being operative. It is concluded that the nanoindentation response can be used to determine whether the material is capable of exhibiting superelastic deformation, provided appropriate procedures are employed. Spherical indenters are more suitable than sharp tips. A relatively low value for the remnant indent depth ratio (depth after unloading/depth at peak load) is indicative that superelasticity is occurring. The procedure was found to be viable with a small radius (10 μm) spherical indenter, so it can be employed to explore local variations in superelastic response.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Ti–Ni shape memory alloys
2. Shape memory alloys
3. Shape memory alloys types and functionalities
4. Characteristics of shape memory alloys
5. Shape memory alloys: materials in action10.1016/0160-9327(91)90119-V ↗
6. Shape memory alloys: a material and a technology10.1002/1527-2648(200111)3:11<837::AID-ADEM837>3.0.CO;2-0 ↗
7. The martensitic transformation
8. Pseudoelasticity of shape-memory titanium-nickel films subjected to dynamic nanoindentation10.1063/1.1737463 ↗
9. Nanoscale pseudoelastic behavior of indented titanium–nickel films10.1063/1.1623942 ↗
10. In situ transmission electron microscopy and nanoindentation studies of phase transformation and pseudoelasticity of shape-memory titanium–nickel films10.1557/JMR.2005.0226 ↗
11. Microscopic superelastic behavior of a nickel–titanium alloy under complex loading conditions10.1063/1.1569984 ↗
12. Microscopic shape memory and superelastic effects under complex loading conditions10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00920-4 ↗
13. Shape-memory polymers for microelectromechanical systems10.1109/JMEMS.2004.828727 ↗
14. Shape recovery and stress-induced martensite in TiNi following indentation and wear loading
15. Recovery of microindents in a nickel–titanium shape-memory alloy: a self-healing effect10.1063/1.1476064 ↗
16. Thermomechanical high-density data storage in a metallic material via the shape-memory effect10.1002/adma.200400942 ↗
17. Shape memory effect in nanoindentation of nickel–titanium thin films10.1063/1.1591235 ↗
18. Characteristic of microscopic shape memory effect in a CuAlNi alloy by nanoindentation10.1007/s10853-005-0591-1 ↗
19. Measurement of microscopic deformation in a CuAlNi single crystal alloy by nanoindentation with a heating stage10.1016/j.matdes.2004.07.005 ↗
20. A comparative review of the (Potential) shape memory alloys
21. Torra · 1987
22. Structural and mechanical characterisation of boron and nitrogen implanted NiTi shape memory alloy10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00188-3 ↗
23. Thermal processing of polycrystalline NiTi shape memory alloys10.1016/j.msea.2005.05.102 ↗
24. Comparison of nano-indentation hardness to microhardness10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.07.108 ↗
25. An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments10.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
26. Computational modeling of the forward and reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00295-6 ↗
27. Indentation modelling of heterogeneous materials10.1088/0965-0393/9/5/304 ↗
28. On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing. Part II: Experimental investigation10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00123-9 ↗
29. On the determination of residual stress and strain fields by sharp indentation testing. Part I: Theoretical and numerical analysis10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00122-7 ↗
30. Finite-element analysis of deformation during indentation and scratch tests on elastic-perfectly plastic materials10.1080/01418610208235712 ↗
31. ABAQUS analysis on nitinol medical applications
32. Shape-memory alloys: modelling and numerical simulations of the finite-strain superelastic behavior10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01147-4 ↗
33. Shape-memory alloys: macromodelling and numerical simulations of the superelastic behavior10.1016/S0045-7825(96)01232-7 ↗
34. Rebelo NG, Gong X-Y, Connally M. Finite element analysis of nitinol’s plastic behaviour. In: Proceedings of the international conference on shape memory and superelastic technologies. SPIE; 2003. p. 501–7.
35. Yield surfaces of shape memory alloys and their applications10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00119-6 ↗
36. Transformation start stress in non-textured shape memory alloys10.1088/0964-1726/11/2/309 ↗
37. Phase transformation yield surface determination for some shape memory alloys10.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.022 ↗
38. Mechanism of shape memory effect and superelasticity