Prediction of structural, electronic and elastic properties of Y2Ti2O7 and Y2TiO5
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Density functional theory calculations have been performed to study the structural, electronic and elastic properties, and formation energies, of pyrochlore Y2Ti2O7 and orthorhombic Y2TiO5. These oxides are among the hardening features in nano-dispersion-strengthened ferritic alloys that are promising for future advanced fission/fusion energy applications. Calculations employ pseudo-potentials generated within the projector-augmented wave (PAW) method and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) as well as the local density approximation (LDA) to the exchange–correlation functional. The calculated equilibrium structural parameters agree well with experiment for both oxides. The PAW–GGA yields the better bulk modulus of Y2Ti2O7, and hence is used for all the elastic calculations. A complete set of elastic parameters for both oxides are reported. Analysis of electron localization functions, charge densities, and densities of states suggest that the oxide bonds are highly ionic, but with some covalent character. In both cases the Ti–O bonds exhibit higher covalency than the Y–O bonds.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Nuclear Materials and Properties · Fusion materials and technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Odette · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
2. Alinger · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 39210.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.025 ↗
3. Hoelzer · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 367–370 · 16610.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.151 ↗
4. Alinger · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 329 · 38210.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.042 ↗
5. Yamamoto · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 367–370 · 39910.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.047 ↗
6. Odette · Trans Am Nucl Soc · 2008 · 98 · 1149
7. Miao · J Nucl Mater · 2008 · 377 · 5910.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.042 ↗
8. Miller · Mater Sci Eng · 2003 · A353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
9. Miller · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 329–333 · 33810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.085 ↗
10. Klimiankou · Micron · 2005 · 36 · 110.1016/j.micron.2004.08.001 ↗
11. Yamashita · Philos Mag Lett · 2004 · 84 · 52510.1080/09500830412331303609 ↗
12. Arzt · Acta Metal · 1986 · 34 · 189310.1016/0001-6160(86)90247-6 ↗
13. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
14. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
15. Kresse G, Furthmüller J. .
16. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
17. Perdew · 1991 · 11
18. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
19. Blochl · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 49 · 1622310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
20. Terkia · Physica B · 2007 · 392 · 34110.1016/j.physb.2006.11.047 ↗
21. Subramanian · Prog Solid State Chem · 1983 · 15 · 5510.1016/0079-6786(83)90001-8 ↗
22. Mizutani · J Am Ceram Soc · 1976 · 59 · 16810.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09459.x ↗
23. Mumme · Acta Crystallogr B · 1968 · 24 · 132710.1107/S0567740868004243 ↗
24. Kittel · 1986
25. Simmons · 1971
26. Becke · J Chem Phys · 1990 · 92 · 539710.1063/1.458517 ↗
27. Schaedlera · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2008 · 28 · 250910.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.03.011 ↗
28. Wallace · 1972
29. Stadler · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 172910.1103/PhysRevB.54.1729 ↗
30. Pruneda · Phys Rev B · 2005 · 72 · 08510710.1103/PhysRevB.72.085107 ↗
31. Ravindran · J Appl Phys · 1998 · 84 · 489110.1063/1.368733 ↗
32. Caspersen · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 11550110.1103/PhysRevLett.93.115501 ↗
33. Hill · Proc Phys Soc London · 1952 · 65 · 35010.1088/0370-1298/65/5/307 ↗
34. Voigt · 1928
35. Reuss · Z Angew Math Mech · 1929 · 9 · 5510.1002/zamm.19290090104 ↗
36. Pugh · Philos Mag · 1954 · 45 · 82310.1080/14786440808520496 ↗
37. Liu · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 294910.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.035 ↗
38. Shimamura · Int J Thermophys · 2007 · 28 · 107410.1007/s10765-007-0232-9 ↗