Effect of specimen thickness on the creep response of a Ni-based single-crystal superalloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Creep tests on Ni-based single-crystal superalloy sheet specimens typically show greater creep strain rates and/or reduced strain or time to creep rupture for thinner specimens than predicted by current theories, which predict a size-independent creep strain rate and creep rupture strain. This size-dependent creep response is termed the thickness debit effect. To investigate the mechanism of the thickness debit effect, isothermal, constant nominal stress creep tests were performed on uncoated PWA1484 Ni-based single-crystal superalloy sheet specimens of thicknesses 3.18 and 0.51 mm under two test conditions: 760 °C/758 MPa and 982 °C/248 MPa. The specimens contained initial microvoids formed during the solidification and homogenization processes. The dependence of the creep response on specimen thickness differed under the two test conditions: at 760 °C/758 MPa there was a reduction in the creep strain and the time to rupture with decreasing section thickness, whereas at 982 °C/248 MPa a decreased thickness resulted in an increased creep rate even at low strain levels and a decreased time to rupture but with no systematic dependence of the creep strain to rupture on specimen thickness. For the specimens tested at 760 °C/758 MPa microscopic analyses revealed that the thick specimens exhibited a mixed failure mode of void growth and cleavage-like fracture while the predominant failure mode for the thin specimens was cleavage-like fracture. The creep specimens tested at 982 °C/248 MPa in air showed the development of surface oxides and a near-surface precipitate-free zone. Finite-element analysis revealed that the presence of the alumina layer at the free surface imposes a constraint that locally increases the stress triaxiality and changes the value of the Lode parameter (a measure of the third stress invariant). The surface cracks formed in the oxide scale were arrested by further oxidation; for a thickness of 3.18 mm the failure mode was void nucleation, growth and coalescence, whereas for a thickness of 0.51 mm there was a mixed mode of ductile and cleavage-like fracture.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Microstructure and mechanical properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. Gell · Superalloys · 1980 · 205
2. Koff · J Propul Power · 2004 · 20 · 57710.2514/1.4361 ↗
3. Pandey · Proc R Soc Lond, Ser A · 1984 · 117
4. Doner M, Heckler JA. Effects of section thickness and orientation on creep rupture properties of two advanced single crystal alloys. SAE technical paper 851785. Society of Automative Engineers; 1985.10.4271/851785 ↗
5. Directionally solidified superalloys
6. Doner M, Heckler JA. Identification of mechanism responsible for degradation in thin-wall stress rupture properties. In: Superalloys 1988, Proceedings of 6th international symposium on superalloys. Warrendale, PA: TMS; 1988. p. 653–62.10.7449/1988/Superalloys_1988_653_662 ↗
7. 1989 · 149
8. Pandey · Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia · 1994 · 31 · 71910.1016/0956-716X(94)90216-X ↗
9. Baldan · J Mater Sci · 1995 · 30 · 628810.1007/BF00369679 ↗
10. Seetharaman V, Cetel AD. Thickness debit in creep properties of PWA1484. Superalloys 2004. Warrendale, PA: TMS; 2004. p. 207–14.10.7449/2004/Superalloys_2004_207_214 ↗
11. Henderson PJ. Creep of single crystal Ni-base superalloy in thick and thin section forms. In: Earthman JC, Mohamed FA, editors. Creep and fracture of engineering materials and structures; 1997. p. 697–706.
12. Henderson PJ. Creep of coated and uncoated thin-section CMSX-4. Materials for advanced power engineering. Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH; 1998. p. 1559–68.
13. Creep behavior of thick and thin walled structures of a single crystal Ni-base superalloy at high temperatures—experimental method and results
14. Hüttner · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 510
15. Second generation nickel base single crystal superalloy
16. Prediction of remaining life in low-alloy steels
17. Storesund · Int J Pres Ves Pip · 1995 · 62 · 17910.1016/0308-0161(94)00009-8 ↗
18. Ueno A, Takami N, Sato R. In: Pokluda J, editor. Proceedings of 17th European conference of fracture. Brno, Czech Republic; 2008. p. 1120–7.
19. Villain · Sens Actuat A · 2002 · 99 · 19410.1016/S0924-4247(01)00882-2 ↗
20. Ashby · Philos Magaz · 1970 · 21 · 39910.1080/14786437008238426 ↗
21. Ma · J Mater Res · 1995 · 10 · 85310.1557/JMR.1995.0853 ↗
22. Lou · J Mater Res · 2003 · 18 · 71910.1557/JMR.2003.0097 ↗
23. Poole · Scripta Materialia · 1996 · 34 · 55910.1016/1359-6462(95)00524-2 ↗
24. Nix · J Mech Phys Solids · 1995 · 43 · 411
25. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
26. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
27. Nicola · J Mech Phys Solids · 2006 · 54 · 208910.1016/j.jmps.2006.04.005 ↗
28. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 382510.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.003 ↗
29. Benzerga · J Mech Phys Solids · 2009 · 57 · 145910.1016/j.jmps.2009.06.003 ↗
30. Rao · Acta Mater · 2008 · 324510.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.011 ↗
31. Kraft · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2010 · 40 · 29310.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145409 ↗
32. Greer · Progr Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
33. Zupan · Experimen Mech · 2004 · 41 · 24210.1007/BF02323140 ↗
34. Hemker · Ann Rev Mater Res · 2007 · 37 · 9310.1146/annurev.matsci.36.062705.134551 ↗
35. Gullickson · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2008 · 07500910.1088/0965-0393/16/7/075009 ↗
36. Cassenti · Mater Sci Eng A · 2009 · 508 · 18310.1016/j.msea.2008.12.051 ↗
37. Bensch · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 160710.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.004 ↗
38. Duhl DN, Cetel AD. Advanced high strength single crystal superalloy compositions. US Patent 4719080, 12 January 1988.
39. Anton · Mater Sci Eng · 1985 · 76 · 17310.1016/0025-5416(85)90091-6 ↗
40. Link · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 425 · 4710.1016/j.msea.2006.03.005 ↗
41. Li · J Mater Sci · 2002 · 37 · 352110.1023/A:1016527509815 ↗
42. Rae · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 106710.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.026 ↗
43. Wilson · JOM J Min Metals Mater Soc · 2008 · 60 · 4310.1007/s11837-008-0088-x ↗
44. Sherry · Mater Sci Eng A · 1993 · 173 · 5110.1016/0921-5093(93)90425-E ↗
45. ASM Handbook. Fractography, vol. 12; 1987.
46. MacKay · Metall Trans A · 1985 · 16A · 196910.1007/BF02662398 ↗
47. Pollock · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 185910.1016/0956-7151(94)90011-6 ↗
48. Reed · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 336710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00217-7 ↗
49. Akhtar · JOM J Min Metals Mater Soc · 2006 · 58 · 3710.1007/s11837-006-0066-0 ↗
50. Moverare · Mater Sci Eng: A · 2010 · 527 · 55310.1016/j.msea.2009.08.023 ↗
51. Bond · J Mater Sci · 1984 · 19 · 386710.1007/BF00980749 ↗
52. Meng · Int J Min Metall Mater · 2011 · 18 · 19710.1007/s12613-011-0422-0 ↗
53. Epishin · Philos Magaz · 2004 · 84 · 197910.1080/14786430410001663240 ↗
54. Srivastava · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2012 · 20 · 03501010.1088/0965-0393/20/3/035010 ↗
55. ABAQUS User’s Manual, version 6.6. ABAQUS Inc., Providence, RI; 2006.