First-principles study on the mobility of screw dislocations in bcc iron
Source abstract
Abstract
The fully two-dimensional Peierls barrier map of screw dislocations in BCC iron has been calculated using the first principles method to identify the migration path of a dislocation core. An efficient method to correct the effect of the finite size cell used in the first principles method on the energy of a lattice defect was devised to determine the accurate barrier profile. We find that the migration path is close to a straight line which is confined in a $\{110\}$ plane and the Peierls barrier profile is single-humped. This result clarifies a reason that the existing empirical potentials of BCC iron fail to predict the correct mobility path. A line tension model, incorporating these first principles calculation results, is used to predict the kink activation energy to be 0.73 eV in agreement with experiment.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Fusion materials and technologies · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Kim · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 235510.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.022 ↗
2. Caillard · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 349310.1016/j.actamat.2010.02.023 ↗
3. Caillard · Acta Mater · 2010 · 3504
4. Spitzig · Acta Metal · 1970 · 18 · 127510.1016/0001-6160(70)90158-6 ↗
5. Vitek · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 55710.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.002 ↗
6. Woodward · Phys Rev Lett · 2002 · 88 · 21640210.1103/PhysRevLett.88.216402 ↗
7. Frederiksen · Philos Mag · 2003 · 83 · 36510.1080/0141861021000034568 ↗
8. Clouet · Phys Rev Lett · 2009 · 102 · 05550210.1103/PhysRevLett.102.055502 ↗
9. Ventelon · Philos Mag · 2010 · 90 · 106310.1080/14786431003668793 ↗
10. Chaussidon · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 340710.1016/j.actamat.2006.03.044 ↗
11. Ventelon · J Comput-Aid Mater Des · 2007 · 14 · 8510.1007/s10820-007-9064-y ↗
12. Clouet · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 22411110.1103/PhysRevB.84.224111 ↗
13. Clouet · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 22410710.1103/PhysRevB.84.224107 ↗
14. Ventelon · These de l’Universite Claude Bernard Lyon · 2008 · 1
15. Mendelev · Phil Mag A · 2003 · 83 · 397710.1080/14786430310001613264 ↗
16. Douin · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 46610.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.027 ↗
17. Rodney · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 79 · 09410810.1103/PhysRevB.79.094108 ↗
18. Gröger · Philos Mag Lett · 2007 · 87 · 11310.1080/09500830601158781 ↗
19. Domain · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 95 · 21550610.1103/PhysRevLett.95.215506 ↗
20. Segall · Phys Rev B · 2003 · 68 · 01410410.1103/PhysRevB.68.014104 ↗
21. Gröger · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 540110.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.018 ↗
22. Rodney · Phys Rev B · 2007 · 76 · 14410810.1103/PhysRevB.76.144108 ↗
23. Edagawa · Phys Rev B · 1997 · 55 · 618010.1103/PhysRevB.55.6180 ↗
24. Ventelon · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 286–388 · 2610.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.053 ↗
25. E · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 66 · 05230110.1103/PhysRevB.66.052301 ↗
26. Spitzig · Acta Metal · 1970 · 18 · 102110.1016/0001-6160(70)90058-1 ↗
27. Marian · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 15810.1038/nmat1072 ↗
28. Gordon · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 18 · 08500810.1088/0965-0393/18/8/085008 ↗
29. Gordon · Philos Mag · 2011 · 91 · 393110.1080/14786435.2011.597947 ↗
30. Lavrentiev · J Appl Phys · 2011 · 109 · 07E12310.1063/1.3556900 ↗