Observations of grain boundary impurities in nanocrystalline Al and their influence on microstructural stability and mechanical behaviour
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The exceptional properties of nanocrystalline materials lend themselves to a wide range of structural and functional applications. There is recent evidence to suggest that grain boundary impurities may have a dramatic effect on the stability, strength and ductility of nanocrystalline metals and alloys. In this study, transmission electron microscopy and atom probe tomography were used to characterize specimens deposited at different base pressures, thus providing a direct comparison of impurity content with microstructural stability and mechanical behaviour. Atom probe measurements provide clear experimental evidence of grain boundary segregation of oxygen in samples deposited at higher base pressures. It is proposed that these oxygen atoms pin the boundaries, preventing stress-assisted grain growth and resulting in increased strength and loss in ductility. This study provides the first direct experimental evidence that boundary impurities play a critical role in determining the microstructural stability and deformation behaviour of nanocrystalline metals.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Meyers · Prog Mater Sci · 2006 · 51 · 42710.1016/j.pmatsci.2005.08.003 ↗
2. Bai · Science · 2010 · 327 · 163110.1126/science.1183723 ↗
3. Choi · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 447310.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.006 ↗
4. Jin · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 320210.1016/j.tsf.2006.01.052 ↗
5. Jin · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 538110.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.044 ↗
6. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 87
7. Brandstetter · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 6110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.08.042 ↗
8. Pan · Nano Lett · 2007 · 7 · 210810.1021/nl071093m ↗
9. Fan · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 478110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.016 ↗
10. Gianola · Adv Mater · 2008 · 20 · 30310.1002/adma.200701607 ↗
11. Gianola · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 225310.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.023 ↗
12. Gianola · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 64910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.002 ↗
13. Meirom · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 114110.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.047 ↗
14. Legros · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 338010.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.032 ↗
15. Gianola · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 483–84 · 63710.1016/j.msea.2006.12.155 ↗
16. Elsener · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 198810.1016/j.actamat.2009.01.001 ↗
17. Zhou · J Mater Res · 2001 · 16 · 345110.1557/JMR.2001.0474 ↗
18. Liu · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 457 · 1310.1016/j.msea.2007.01.142 ↗
19. Kirchheim · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 41310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00338-X ↗
20. Felfer · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 43510.1016/j.ultramic.2010.12.005 ↗
21. Gianola · TMS Lett · 2004 · 1
22. Gianola · JOM-J Miner Met Mater Soc · 2009 · 61 · 2410.1007/s11837-009-0037-3 ↗
23. Sharpe WN Jr, Pulskamp JS, Gianola DS, Mendis BG, Eberl C, Polcawich R, et al. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ASME annual meeting, Chicago, IL; 2006.
24. Thompson · Ultramicroscopy · 2007 · 107 · 13110.1016/j.ultramic.2006.06.008 ↗
25. Felfer P, Alam T, Ringer SP, Cairney JM. Microsc Res Tech 2011, doi:10.1002/jemt.21081. [Epub ahead of print].10.1002/jemt.21081 ↗
26. Gault · Microsc Microanal · 2008 · 14 · 29610.1017/S1431927608080690 ↗
27. Krakauer · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 48 · 672410.1103/PhysRevB.48.6724 ↗
28. Ina · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 387 · 39010.1016/j.msea.2004.05.042 ↗
29. Sigle · Appl Phys Lett · 1999 · 89 · 12191110.1063/1.2356322 ↗
30. Ruan · Ultramicroscopy · 2011 · 111 · 106210.1016/j.ultramic.2011.01.026 ↗
31. Seidman · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2007 · 37 · 12710.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084200 ↗
32. Blavette · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 499510.1016/S1359-6454(96)00087-0 ↗
33. Hellman · Microsc Microanal · 2000 · 6 · 43710.1007/S100050010051 ↗
34. Haque · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2004 · 101 · 633510.1073/pnas.0400066101 ↗
35. Solid solution hardening
36. Labusch · Phys Stat Solid · 1970 · 41 · 65910.1002/pssb.19700410221 ↗
37. Courtney · 1999
38. Rupert TJ · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 161910.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.026 ↗
39. Gibbs · 1928
40. McLean · 1957
41. Weissmuller · Nanostruct Mater · 1993 · 3 · 26110.1016/0965-9773(93)90088-S ↗
42. Weissmuller · J Mater Res · 1994 · 9 · 410.1557/JMR.1994.0004 ↗
43. Millett · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 232910.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.028 ↗
44. Krill CE, Klein R, Janes S, Birringer R. In: Yavari AR, editor. Mechanically alloyed and nanocrystalline materials: ismanam-94, vol. 179; 1995. p. 443.10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.179-181.443 ↗
45. Caro · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63
46. Cahn · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 495310.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.004 ↗
47. Rupert · Science · 2009 · 326 · 168610.1126/science.1178226 ↗
48. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 574310.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
49. Yamakov · Nat Mater · 2002 · 1 · 4510.1038/nmat700 ↗
50. Van Swygenhoven · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64
51. Chen · Science · 2003 · 300 · 127510.1126/science.1083727 ↗
52. Detor · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 323310.1557/JMR.2007.0403 ↗
53. Dieter · 1986
54. Haque · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 47 · 86310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00306-8 ↗
55. Zhilyaev · Prog Mater Sci · 2008 · 53 · 89310.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.002 ↗
56. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 43110.1016/S1359-6454(02)00427-5 ↗
57. Ames · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 425510.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.051 ↗