journal article·2012-04

Atomic-scale study of nucleation of dislocations from fcc–bcc interfaces

R.F. Zhang, J. Wang, I.J. Beyerlein, A. Misra, T.C. Germann

Acta Materialia· Volume 60· Issue 6-7
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Using atomistic simulations, we reveal the role of the atomic interface structure on the nucleation of glissile dislocations from a low-energy, atomically flat, incoherent face-centered cubic–body-centered cubic interface with a Kurdjumov–Sachs orientation relationship. Several loading states are simulated to systematically probe the selection of slip systems. Contrary to conventional expectation, the preferred nucleation sites are not always associated with pre-existing misfit dislocations, and the preferred slip systems are not determined solely by the Schmid factor. Amongst the two or more systems that may be geometrically favored, the activated slip system depends on the structure of the nucleation site. The system–site combination is such that the dislocation deposited in the interface after the nucleation event lowers the interfacial energy and has a relatively low self-energy. The fundamental correlations established here apply to interfaces of other orientation relationships that are also flat and have spatially non-uniform shear resistance.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Demkowicz · 2008 · vol. 14 · 141
2. Misra · MRS Bull · 2010 · 35 · 965
3. Phillips · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 315710.1016/S1359-6454(03)00127-7 ↗
4. Misra · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 238710.1016/j.actamat.2004.01.029 ↗
5. Misra · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 481710.1016/j.actamat.2005.06.025 ↗
6. Nix · Metall Trans A · 1989 · 20A · 221710.1007/BF02666659 ↗
7. Mara · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 58 · 87410.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.005 ↗
8. Mara · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 23190110.1063/1.2938921 ↗
9. Mara · Appl Phys Lett · 2010 · 97 · 02190910.1063/1.3458000 ↗
10. Li · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 598910.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.007 ↗
11. Zhu · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2007 · 104 · 303110.1073/pnas.0611097104 ↗
12. Wang · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 83 · 06410610.1103/PhysRevB.83.064106 ↗
13. Brown · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 445410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.009 ↗
14. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 24110.1016/j.actamat.2010.09.028 ↗
15. Tschopp · 2008 · vol. 14 · 43
16. Spearot · Int J Plast · 2007 · 23 · 14310.1016/j.ijplas.2006.03.008 ↗
17. Spearot · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 357910.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.012 ↗
18. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 598310.1063/1.1835549 ↗
19. Li · Nature · 2010 · 464 · 87710.1038/nature08929 ↗
20. Van Swygenhoven · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 39910.1038/nmat1136 ↗
21. Zhu · Nat Mater · 2004 · 3 · 35110.1038/nmat1141 ↗
22. Shan · Phys Rev Lett · 2007 · 98 · 09550210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.095502 ↗
23. Wang J, Beyerlein IJ. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng (2012); in press. Available from stacks.iop.org/MSMSE/20.
24. Wang J, Beyerlein IJ, Hirth JP. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng; in press. Available from: stacks.iop.org/MSMSE/19).
25. Beyerlein · Proc Roy Soc A · 2012
26. Beyerlein · Proc Roy Soc A · 2010 · 466 · 251710.1098/rspa.2009.0661 ↗
27. Zhang · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 102210.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.09.008 ↗
28. Derlet · MRS Bull · 2009 · 34 · 18410.1557/mrs2009.50 ↗
29. Wang · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 108310.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.02.025 ↗
30. Han · Appl Phys Lett · 2012 · 100 · 01191110.1063/1.3675447 ↗
31. Han · Philos Mag · 2011 · 91 · 417210.1080/14786435.2011.603706 ↗
32. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 568510.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.041 ↗
33. Wang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 310910.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.003 ↗
34. Wang · Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci · 2011 · 15 · 2010.1016/j.cossms.2010.09.002 ↗
35. Demkowicz · J Nucl Mater · 2008 · 372 · 4510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.02.001 ↗
36. Demkowicz · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 13610210.1103/PhysRevLett.100.136102 ↗
37. Wang · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 316410.1016/j.actamat.2011.01.056 ↗
38. Voter · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 1987 · 82 · 17510.1557/PROC-82-175 ↗
39. Johnson · J Mater Res · 1989 · 4 · 119510.1557/JMR.1989.1195 ↗
40. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 94 · 13191010.1063/1.3111137 ↗
41. Liu · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 454910.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.008 ↗
42. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 88 · 20311210.1063/1.2204760 ↗
43. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 95 · 2190810.1063/1.3176979 ↗
44. Wang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 226210.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.013 ↗
45. Wang · J Mater Res · 2008 · 23 · 100910.1557/jmr.2008.0120 ↗
46. Liu · Surf Sci · 1991 · 253 · 33410.1016/0039-6028(91)90604-Q ↗
47. Huang · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 475210.1063/1.1631389 ↗
48. Wang · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2004 · 12 · 120910.1088/0965-0393/12/6/014 ↗
49. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2001 · 79 · 362110.1063/1.1421425 ↗
50. Barnett · J Phys · 1974 · F4 · 161810.1088/0305-4608/4/10/010 ↗
51. Hirth · 1992
52. Wang · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 150310.1016/j.actamat.2011.11.047 ↗