journal article·2008-09Open access

Solute strengthening of both mobile and forest dislocations: The origin of dynamic strain aging in fcc metals

M.A. Soare, W.A. Curtin

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 15

Abstract

A full rate-dependent constitutive theory for dynamic strain aging is developed based on two key ideas. The first idea is that both solute strengthening and forest strengthening must exist and must exhibit aging phenomena. The second idea is that a single physical aging mechanism, cross-core diffusion within a dislocation core, controls the aging of both the solute and forest strengthening mechanisms. All the material parameters in the model, apart from forest dislocation density evolution parameters, are derivable from atomistic-scale studies so that the theory contains essentially no adjustable parameters. The model predicts the steady-state stress/strain/strain-rate/temperature/concentration dependent material response for a variety of Al-Mg alloys, including negative strain-rate sensitivity, in qualitative and quantitative agreement with available experiments. The model also reveals the origin of non-additivity of solute and forest strengthening, and explains observed non-standard transient stress behavior in strain-rate jump tests. (C) 2008 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (54)

Show source-provided references
1. Soare · Acta Mater · 2008
2. Cottrell · Proc Royal Soc London. Series A, Math Phys Sci · 1955 · 233 · 17
3. McCormick · Acta Metall · 1972 · 20 · 35110.1016/0001-6160(72)90028-4 ↗
4. McCormick · Scripta Metall · 1987 · 12 · 19710.1016/0036-9748(78)90163-1 ↗
5. Beukel · Acta Metall · 1982 · 30 · 102710.1016/0001-6160(82)90211-5 ↗
6. Kubin · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 69710.1016/0956-7151(90)90021-8 ↗
7. Kubin · Phys Stat Sol(b) · 1992 · 172 · 17310.1002/pssb.2221720117 ↗
8. Ananthakrishna · Mat Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400–401 · 21010.1016/j.msea.2005.03.037 ↗
9. Rizzi · Int J Plasticity · 2004 · 20 · 12110.1016/S0749-6419(03)00035-4 ↗
10. Curtin · Nature Mater · 2006 · 5 · 87510.1038/nmat1765 ↗
11. Picu · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 344710.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.042 ↗
12. Soare · Int J Multiscale Comp Eng · 2005 · 3 · 41510.1615/IntJMultCompEng.v3.i4.20 ↗
13. Kocks · Metal Trans A · 1985 · 16A · 210910.1007/BF02670415 ↗
14. Kocks · Prog Mat Sci · 1975 · 19 · 110.1016/0079-6425(75)90005-5 ↗
15. Hähner · Mat Sci Eng A · 1996 · 207 · 20810.1016/0921-5093(95)10033-4 ↗
16. Hähner · Mat Sci Eng A · 1996 · 207 · 21610.1016/0921-5093(95)10032-6 ↗
17. Olmsted · J Mech Phys Sol · 2006 · 54 · 176310.1016/j.jmps.2005.12.008 ↗
18. Van den Beukel · Phys Stat Sol A · 1975 · 30 · 19710.1002/pssa.2210300120 ↗
19. Balík · Acta Metall Mater · 1993 · 41 · 144710.1016/0956-7151(93)90253-O ↗
20. Fujikawa · Defect Diff Forum · 1997 · 143–147 · 40910.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.143-147.409 ↗
21. Picu · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 16110.1016/j.actamat.2003.09.002 ↗
22. Ananthakrishna · Phys Lett · 1983 · 95A · 6910.1016/0375-9601(83)90141-X ↗
23. Amodeo · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 41 · 695810.1103/PhysRevB.41.6958 ↗
24. Fivel · Model Simul Mater Eng · 1996 · 4 · 58110.1088/0965-0393/4/6/003 ↗
25. Rodney · Phys Rev Lett · 1999 · 82 · 170410.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1704 ↗
26. Shenoy · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 84 · 149110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1491 ↗
27. Ananthakrishna · Physics Rep · 2007 · 440 · 11310.1016/j.physrep.2006.10.003 ↗
28. Fressengeas · Mat Sci Eng A · 2005 · 400–401 · 22610.1016/j.msea.2005.02.073 ↗
29. Kocks · J Eng Mater Tech (Trans ASME Series H) · 1976 · 98 · 7610.1115/1.3443340 ↗
30. Labusch · Phys Stat Sol · 1970 · 41 · 56910.1002/pssb.19700410221 ↗
31. Zaiser · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 286910.1080/01418610208240071 ↗
32. Benallal · Eur J Mech A/Solids · 2006 · 25 · 39710.1016/j.euromechsol.2005.10.007 ↗
33. Picu · Mat Sci Eng A · 2003 · 390 · 33410.1016/j.msea.2004.08.029 ↗
34. Krajewski PE. The warm ductility of commercial aluminum sheet alloys. Report to GM R&D and planning; 2005.10.4271/2005-01-1388 ↗
35. Ayres · Metall Trans A · 1978 · 10 · 84910.1007/BF02658303 ↗
36. Balik · Mat Sci Eng · 2001 · A316 · 10210.1016/S0921-5093(01)01223-0 ↗
37. Hähner · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65
38. Van den Brink · Phys Stat Sol A · 1975 · 30 · 46910.1002/pssa.2210300205 ↗
39. Wycliffe · Scripta Metall · 1980 · 14 · 134910.1016/0036-9748(80)90193-3 ↗
40. Nortmann · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 204310.1016/S1359-6454(96)00292-3 ↗
41. Nortmann · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 205110.1016/S1359-6454(96)00293-5 ↗
42. Schwink · Mat Sci Eng A · 1997 · 234 · 110.1016/S0921-5093(97)00139-1 ↗
43. On the physical parameters governing the flow stress of solid solutions in a wide range of temperatures
44. Kalk · Philos Mag A · 1995 · 72 · 123910.1080/01418619508236253 ↗
45. Horvath · J Mater Res · 2005 · 20 · 33110.1557/JMR.2005.0040 ↗
46. Bloom · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 26510.1016/0001-6160(85)90144-0 ↗
47. Abbadi · Mat Sci Eng A · 2002 · 337 · 19410.1016/S0921-5093(02)00036-9 ↗
48. Pink · Acta Metall · 1982 · 30 · 215310.1016/0001-6160(82)90136-5 ↗
49. Kral · Mat Sci Eng A · 1997 · 234 · 78610.1016/S0921-5093(97)00327-4 ↗
50. Kumar · Scripta Metall Mater · 1995 · 33 · 8110.1016/0956-716X(95)00099-H ↗
51. Picu RC. Private communications.
52. Ling · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 263110.1016/0956-7151(90)90275-L ↗
53. Carlone · Exp Mech · 1996 · 36 · 36010.1007/BF02328579 ↗
54. Saimoto · Mat Sci Forum · 2005 · 421 · 475