Evolution of shear bands, free volume and hardness during cold rolling of a Zr-based bulk metallic glass
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Two-dimensional cold rolling was performed on a bulk metallic glass (BMG) with composition Zr 58.5 Cu 15.6 Ni 12.8 Al 10.3 Nb 2.8 . The average shear band density continuously increased with plastic strain. By comparing with published data, a common relation is proposed whereby the average shear band density scales with the square root of the induced true plastic strain, independent of changes in BMG composition or loading mode. Also, the measured exothermal heat release preceding the glass transition, and thus also the free volume, was found to increase linearly with shear band density. Based on an analysis of the measured shear band densities and enthalpy changes, it is concluded that the free volume of both the matrix and the shear bands must evolve continuously during deformation. Finally, the measured hardness during cold rolling was found to decrease initially within the low deformation regime and then increase at higher deformations with a minimum at a strain of ∼0.073. By recognizing the commonality in the shear band formation among different loading modes, the contributions of shear band generation and residual stresses to the hardness changes were separated. The initial decrease in hardness was attributed to free volume generation and a softening of the material, while the subsequent increase in hardness was related to the evolution of compressive residual stresses during cold rolling. It is suggested that these competing mechanisms affecting hardness may help to explain the different observations in the literature concerning the influence of pre-deformation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu · Adv Eng Mater · 2009 · 11 · 89810.1002/adem.200900023 ↗
2. Das · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 9410.1103/PhysRevLett.94.205501 ↗
3. Yavari · MRS Bull · 2007 · 32 · 63510.1557/mrs2007.125 ↗
4. Scudino · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 65 · 81510.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.07.039 ↗
5. Tan · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 9810.1063/1.3589363 ↗
6. Conner · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 608910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00275-4 ↗
7. Choi-Yim · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 245510.1016/S1359-6454(99)00103-2 ↗
8. Hays · Phys Rev Lett · 2000 · 84 · 290110.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2901 ↗
9. Sun · Mater Sci Eng A – Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2006 · 435 · 13210.1016/j.msea.2006.07.040 ↗
10. Hofmann · Nature · 2008 · 451 · 108510.1038/nature06598 ↗
11. Wu · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 25710.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.012 ↗
12. Argon · Acta Metall Mater · 1979 · 27 · 4710.1016/0001-6160(79)90055-5 ↗
13. Spaepen · Acta Metall Mater · 1977 · 25 · 40710.1016/0001-6160(77)90232-2 ↗
14. Launey · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 483
15. Launey · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 50010.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.007 ↗
16. Murali · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 146710.1016/j.actamat.2004.11.040 ↗
17. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 357210.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.016 ↗
18. Chen · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 7510.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.025 ↗
19. Song · J Appl Phys · 2012 · 111
20. Flores · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 340310.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.040 ↗
21. Liu · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 482710.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.018 ↗
22. Haruyama · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 322410.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.010 ↗
23. Song · Intermetallics · 2011 · 19 · 139410.1016/j.intermet.2011.05.001 ↗
24. Bei · Phys Rev Lett · 2006 · 96 · 10550310.1103/PhysRevLett.96.105503 ↗
25. van den Beukel · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 38310.1016/0956-7151(90)90142-4 ↗
26. Launey · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 91 · 05191310.1063/1.2766659 ↗
27. Slipenyuk · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 3910.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.038 ↗
28. Evenson · J Alloys Compd · 2011 · 509 · S3810.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.044 ↗
29. Evenson · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 440410.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.064 ↗
30. Yoo · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 95110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.07.037 ↗
31. Lewandowski · Nat Mater · 2006 · 5 · 1510.1038/nmat1536 ↗
32. Pan · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 514610.1016/j.actamat.2011.04.047 ↗
33. Klaumünzer · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 10710.1103/PhysRevLett.107.185502 ↗
34. Bokeloh · Phys Rev Lett · 2011 · 107 · 23550310.1103/PhysRevLett.107.235503 ↗
35. Chen · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 121010.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.021 ↗
36. Xie · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 520210.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.009 ↗
37. Jiang · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 346910.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.003 ↗
38. Palit Sagar · NDT E Int · 2005 · 38 · 67410.1016/j.ndteint.2005.04.004 ↗
39. Hanus · J Phys IV Colloq · 1993 · 03 · C7
40. Roy · Mater Eng Perform · 2005 · 14 · 20310.1361/10599490523346 ↗
41. Koohbor · Mater Sci Technol · 2011 · 27 · 162010.1179/026708310X12815992418454 ↗
42. Lin · J Mater Process Technol · 2001 · 110 · 1010.1016/S0924-0136(00)00843-8 ↗