Mechanical response of nanoporous gold
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We report the results of computational tensile and compressive tests for model bi-continuous nanoporous gold structures using atomistic simulations with empirical many-body potentials and molecular dynamics. The results are compared with the predictions of scaling laws for coarser-scale foams and with available experimental data. We find a surprising substantial tension/compression asymmetry in yield due to the surface stress that sets the filament under compression, providing a bias favoring yielding in compression. We provide a model for our results based on a ligament strength value close to the theoretical strength of Au, and the surface stress. The model predicts a significant tension/compression asymmetry for ligament sizes below ∼10 nm and pore collapse for ligament sizes below 1 nm. We also observe an unexpected compaction tendency under tension characterized by a decrease in the total volume of the sample of 15% for samples deformed under tension by 30%. The mechanism of the compaction involves a decrease in the average pore size and pore collapse resulting from plasticity within the ligaments.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoporous metals and alloys · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Anodic Oxide Films and Nanostructures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. Ding · J Am Chem Soc · 2004 · 126 · 687610.1021/ja0320119 ↗
2. Erlebacher · Nature · 2001 · 410 · 45010.1038/35068529 ↗
3. Huang · Adv Funct Mater · 2005 · 15 · 98910.1002/adfm.200400382 ↗
4. Kucheyev · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 5310210.1063/1.2260828 ↗
5. Polarz · J Nanosci Nanotechnol · 2002 · 2 · 58110.1166/jnn.2002.151 ↗
6. Biener · Nano Lett · 2006 · 6 · 237910.1021/nl061978i ↗
7. Biteen · Nano Lett · 2005 · 5 · 176810.1021/nl051207z ↗
8. Bok · Nano Lett · 2008 · 8 · 226510.1021/nl800924r ↗
9. Hopkins · J Nanomater · 2008 · 2008 · 41805010.1155/2008/418050 ↗
10. Liu · J Phys Chem B · 2006 · 110 · 431810.1021/jp056940t ↗
11. Biener · Langmuir · 2010 · 26 · 1373610.1021/la1019422 ↗
12. Gibson · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 2000 · 30 · 19110.1146/annurev.matsci.30.1.191 ↗
13. Biener · Adv Mater · 2008 · 20 · 121110.1002/adma.200701899 ↗
14. Fujita · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 310.1063/1.2948902 ↗
15. Rosner · Adv Eng Mater · 2007 · 9 · 53510.1002/adem.200700063 ↗
16. Ashby · Met Trans · 1983 · 14A · 175510.1007/BF02645546 ↗
17. Gibson · 1997
18. Evans · Prog Mater Sci · 1999 · 43 · 17110.1016/S0079-6425(98)00004-8 ↗
19. Hodge · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 134310.1016/j.actamat.2006.09.038 ↗
20. Hodge · Adv Eng Mater · 2006 · 8 · 85310.1002/adem.200600079 ↗
21. Weinberger · J Mater Chem · 2012 · 22 · 327710.1039/c2jm13682a ↗
22. Kim · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 524510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.027 ↗
23. Kunz · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 441610.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.065 ↗
24. Crowson · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 91910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.02.017 ↗
25. Crowson · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 61 · 49710.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.05.005 ↗
26. Kolluri · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 764510.1016/j.actamat.2011.08.037 ↗
27. To · Appl Phys Lett · 2011 · 98 · 05190310.1063/1.3549858 ↗
28. Haftel · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 64 · 19540510.1103/PhysRevB.64.195405 ↗
29. Foiles · Phys Rev B · 1986 · 33 · 798310.1103/PhysRevB.33.7983 ↗
30. Biener · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 02430110.1063/1.1832742 ↗
31. Balk · JOM · 2009 · 61 · 2610.1007/s11837-009-0176-6 ↗
32. Biener · Appl Phys Lett · 2005 · 87 · 12190810.1063/1.2051791 ↗
33. Johnson · Phys Rev B · 1990 · 41 · 971710.1103/PhysRevB.41.9717 ↗
34. Plimpton · Comput Phys · 1995 · 117 · 110.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
35. Kelchner · Phys Rev B · 1998 · 58 · 1108510.1103/PhysRevB.58.11085 ↗
36. Dou · Phil Mag · 2011 · 91 · 107010.1080/14786435.2010.481271 ↗
37. Volkert · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 06192010.1063/1.2240109 ↗
38. Hyde · JOM · 2005 · 57 · 6210.1007/s11837-005-0118-x ↗
39. Diao · Nanoletters · 2004 · 4 · 186310.1021/nl0489992 ↗
40. Diao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 64310.1016/j.actamat.2005.10.008 ↗
41. Weissmueller · MRS Bull · 2009 · 34 · 57710.1557/mrs2009.157 ↗
42. Kramer · Nano Lett · 2004 · 4 · 79310.1021/nl049927d ↗
43. Gianola · Rev Sci Instrum · 2011 · 82 · 06390110.1063/1.3595423 ↗
44. Xia · J Mater Sci · 2009 · 44 · 472810.1007/s10853-009-3731-1 ↗
45. Sedlmayr · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 398510.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.018 ↗
46. Sun · Microsc Res Techniq · 2009 · 72 · 23210.1002/jemt.20676 ↗
47. Fujita · Nat Mater · 2012 · 11 · 77510.1038/nmat3391 ↗
48. Weissmüller · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 110.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.008 ↗