Influence of interface mobility on the evolution of austenite–martensite grain assemblies during annealing
Source abstract
Abstract
The quenching and partitioning (Q&P) process is a new heat treatment for the creation of advanced high-strength steels. This treatment consists of an initial partial or full austenitization, followed by a quench to form a controlled amount of martensite and an annealing step to partition carbon atoms from the martensite to the austenite. In this work, the microstructural evolution during annealing of martensite-austenite grain assemblies has been analyzed by means of a modeling approach that considers the influence of martensite-austenite interface migration on the kinetics of carbon partitioning. Carbide precipitation is precluded in the model, and three different assumptions about interface mobility are considered, ranging from a completely immobile interface to the relatively high mobility of an incoherent ferrite-austenite interface. Simulations indicate that different interface mobilities lead to profound differences in the evolution of microstructure that is predicted during annealing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Bhadeshia · Metal Sci · 1979 · 325
2. Thomas · Metal Trans A · 1978 · 9A · 43910.1007/BF02646396 ↗
3. Speer · 2003 · 505
4. Speer · Mater Res · 2005 · 8 · 41710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.6-8.417 ↗
5. Speer · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 261110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00059-4 ↗
6. Speer · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 8310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.029 ↗
7. Hillert · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 69710.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.020 ↗
8. Hillert · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 8710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.026 ↗
9. Zhong · J Mater Sci Technol · 2006 · 22 · 751
10. Kim · 2007 · 73
11. Kim · 2008 · 179
12. Matlock · Mater Sci Forum · 2003 · 426–432 · 108910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.1089 ↗
13. Speer · Philos Mag Lett · 2007 · 87 · 37910.1080/09500830701194173 ↗
14. Santofimia · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 15910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.045 ↗
15. Krielaart · Mater Sci Technol · 1998 · 14 · 1010.1179/mst.1998.14.1.10 ↗
16. Mecozzi · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 143110.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.014 ↗
17. Christian · 2002
18. Thermo-Calc Software. .
19. Thiessen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 427 · 22310.1016/j.msea.2006.04.076 ↗
20. Thiessen RG. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology; 2006. p. 130.
21. Crank · 1975
22. Ågren · J Phys Chem Solids · 1982 · 43 · 42110.1016/0022-3697(82)90152-4 ↗
23. Ågren · Scripta Metall · 1986 · 20 · 150710.1016/0036-9748(86)90384-4 ↗
24. Mahieu · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33A · 257310.1007/s11661-002-0378-9 ↗
25. Koistinen · Acta Metall · 1959 · 7 · 5910.1016/0001-6160(59)90170-1 ↗
26. Clarke A.J. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines; 2006. p. 31–2.
27. Apple · Metall Trans · 1974 · 5 · 59310.1007/BF02644654 ↗
28. Swarr · Metal Trans A · 1976 · 7A · 4110.1007/BF02644037 ↗
29. Marder AR. Ph.D. Thesis, Lehigh University; 1968.
30. Clarke A.J. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines; 2006, p. 151.
31. Clarke A.J. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines; 2006, p. 153.
32. Speer · Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci · 2004 · 8 · 21910.1016/j.cossms.2004.09.003 ↗