journal article·2009-09Open access

Influence of interface mobility on the evolution of austenite–martensite grain assemblies during annealing

M.J. Santofimia, J.G. Speer, A.J. Clarke, L. Zhao, J. Sietsma

Acta Materialia· Volume 57· Issue 15

Abstract

The quenching and partitioning (Q&P) process is a new heat treatment for the creation of advanced high-strength steels. This treatment consists of an initial partial or full austenitization, followed by a quench to form a controlled amount of martensite and an annealing step to partition carbon atoms from the martensite to the austenite. In this work, the microstructural evolution during annealing of martensite-austenite grain assemblies has been analyzed by means of a modeling approach that considers the influence of martensite-austenite interface migration on the kinetics of carbon partitioning. Carbide precipitation is precluded in the model, and three different assumptions about interface mobility are considered, ranging from a completely immobile interface to the relatively high mobility of an incoherent ferrite-austenite interface. Simulations indicate that different interface mobilities lead to profound differences in the evolution of microstructure that is predicted during annealing.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Metal Alloys Wear and Properties · Metallurgy and Material Forming

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. Bhadeshia · Metal Sci · 1979 · 325
2. Thomas · Metal Trans A · 1978 · 9A · 43910.1007/BF02646396 ↗
3. Speer · 2003 · 505
4. Speer · Mater Res · 2005 · 8 · 41710.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.6-8.417 ↗
5. Speer · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 261110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00059-4 ↗
6. Speer · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 8310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.029 ↗
7. Hillert · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 69710.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.11.020 ↗
8. Hillert · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 8710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.026 ↗
9. Zhong · J Mater Sci Technol · 2006 · 22 · 751
10. Kim · 2007 · 73
11. Kim · 2008 · 179
12. Matlock · Mater Sci Forum · 2003 · 426–432 · 108910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.426-432.1089 ↗
13. Speer · Philos Mag Lett · 2007 · 87 · 37910.1080/09500830701194173 ↗
14. Santofimia · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 59 · 15910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.02.045 ↗
15. Krielaart · Mater Sci Technol · 1998 · 14 · 1010.1179/mst.1998.14.1.10 ↗
16. Mecozzi · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 143110.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.014 ↗
17. Christian · 2002
18. Thermo-Calc Software. .
19. Thiessen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 427 · 22310.1016/j.msea.2006.04.076 ↗
20. Thiessen RG. Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology; 2006. p. 130.
21. Crank · 1975
22. Ågren · J Phys Chem Solids · 1982 · 43 · 42110.1016/0022-3697(82)90152-4 ↗
23. Ågren · Scripta Metall · 1986 · 20 · 150710.1016/0036-9748(86)90384-4 ↗
24. Mahieu · Metall Mater Trans A · 2002 · 33A · 257310.1007/s11661-002-0378-9 ↗
25. Koistinen · Acta Metall · 1959 · 7 · 5910.1016/0001-6160(59)90170-1 ↗
26. Clarke A.J. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines; 2006. p. 31–2.
27. Apple · Metall Trans · 1974 · 5 · 59310.1007/BF02644654 ↗
28. Swarr · Metal Trans A · 1976 · 7A · 4110.1007/BF02644037 ↗
29. Marder AR. Ph.D. Thesis, Lehigh University; 1968.
30. Clarke A.J. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines; 2006, p. 151.
31. Clarke A.J. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado School of Mines; 2006, p. 153.
32. Speer · Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci · 2004 · 8 · 21910.1016/j.cossms.2004.09.003 ↗