Response of an HMX based explosive to dynamic loading by the Hopkinson split bar technique
Source abstract
Abstract
The dynamic compression and localized adiabatic shear in samples of an HMX based explosive was studied using the split Hopkinson bar technique. Dynamic compression tests were performed at strain rates of (0.3–2.0) · 103 s−1. Fracture of the explosive samples was found to occur at stresses of 60–80 MPa. The behavior of HMX based samples was also studied in localized shear tests at different strain rates (200–2500 s−1). The initiation of explosive transformations under the dynamic loads is discussed.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energetic Materials and Combustion · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior · Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (9)
Show source-provided references
1. G. V. Belov, Yu. B. Bazarov, S. N. Ekimchev, A. K. Zhiembetov, A. V. Kudashov, I. V. Oleinikov, A. V. Shishkanov, and N. I. Shustova, “Effect of the Impactor Velocity on the Explosion Parameters of Brisant Explosives of Two Types,” in Proc. XV Khariton’s Scientific Readings (VNIIEF, Sarov, 2013), pp. 111–118.
2. V. A. Pushkov, A. I. Abakumov, A. V. Yurlov, A. V. Kal’manov, A. A. Sedov, and A. V. Rodionov, “Response of HMX-Based HE to Low-Velocity Loading by Steel Cylindrical Impactor,” AIP Conf. Proc. 1426, Part 1, 418–421 (2012).
3. A. I. Abakumov, A. P. Bol’shakov, S. N. Vasenin, A. P. Gushanov, I. I. Karpenko, and V. A. Sinitsyn, “Design and Experimental Study of Deformation Energy of Materials under Low-Velocity Loading in Composite Bar Hopkinson Tests,” in Proc. XV Khariton’s Scientific Readings (VNIIEF, Sarov, 2007), pp. 215–226.
4. S. K. Chidester, C. M. Tarver, A. H. DePiero, and R. G. Garza, “Single and Multiple Impact Ignition of New and Aged High Explosives in the Stiven Impact Test,” AIP Conf. Proc. 505, 663–666 (2000).10.1063/1.1303560 ↗
5. K. S. Vandersall, “Experimental and Modeling Studies of Crush, Puncture, and Perforation Scenarios in the Steven Impact Test,” in 12th Int. Detonation Symp. (2002), pp. 131–139.
6. D. J. Idar, “Low Amplitude Insult Project: PBX 9501 High Explosive Violent Reaction Experiments,” in 11th Int. Detonation Symp. (1998), pp. 101–110.
7. G. V. Belov, A. R. Gushanov, D. V. Isheyev, V. N. Khvorostin, and N. A. Volodina, “Numeral Simulation of Experiments on the Low-Velocity Impact on Octogen-Based HE Using the Explosive Transformation Initiation Kinetics,” in Abstr. of 7th Int. Meeting on New Models and Hydrocodes for Shock Waves Processes in Condensed Matter (Estoril, Portugal, 2008), pp. 37–38.
8. R. K. Jackson, L. G. Green, R. H. Barlett, W. W. Hofer, P. E. Kramer, R. S. Lee, E. J. Nidick, Jr., L. L. Shaw, and R. C. Weingart, “Initiation and Detonation Characteristics of TATB,” in Detonation and Explosives (Mir, Moscow, 1981), pp. 323–342 [Russain translation].
9. E. M. Mas, B. E. Clements, W. R. Blumenthal, C. M. Cady, and G. T. Gray III, “Applying Micro-Mechanics to Finite Element Simulations of Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Experiments on High Explosives,” in Shock Compression of Condensed Matter (2001), pp. 539–542.