On the effect of a general residual stress state on indentation and hardness testing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract During indentation experiments, residual stresses are superimposed on the applied indentation stress field and influence the measurement of the volume of interest. The residual stress state can vary in magnitude and biaxiality, and the resultant error in the measured hardness is difficult to estimate. A prediction of the effect in the contact pressure with and without residual stresses is carried out by a new model that accounts for nonlinearities caused by the von Mises’ flow rule. The model can also be used for the correction of the effect of a general residual stress state on any further analysis of mechanical properties and stress–strain behaviour from the measured indentation data. The model provides an estimation of the measurement uncertainty when the stress ratio or the strength of the material is unknown – a situation that is a commonly encountered with hardness testing of thin films and welded materials.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Tsui · J Mater Res · 1996 · 11 · 75210.1557/JMR.1996.0091 ↗
2. Bolahskov · J Mater Res · 1996 · 11 · 76010.1557/JMR.1996.0092 ↗
3. Lee · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 45910.1016/S1359-6462(03)00290-2 ↗
4. Zhao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 282310.1016/j.actamat.2006.02.026 ↗
5. Xu · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 191310.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.002 ↗
6. Suresh · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 575510.1016/S1359-6454(98)00226-2 ↗
7. Carlsson · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 217910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00122-7 ↗
8. Swadener · J Mater Res · 2001 · 16 · 209110.1557/JMR.2001.0286 ↗
9. Carlsson · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 219310.1016/S1359-6454(01)00123-9 ↗
10. Larsson · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 515510.1080/14786430600589089 ↗
11. Larsson · J Mater Proc Technol · 2007 · 184 · 37210.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.12.003 ↗
12. Lee · Mater Sci Forum · 2004 · 449–452 · 9310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.449-452.93 ↗
13. Lee · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 155510.1016/j.actamat.2003.12.006 ↗
14. Lee · Philos Mag · 2006 · 21 · 549710.1080/14786430600776330 ↗
15. Chen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 416 · 13910.1016/j.msea.2005.10.034 ↗
16. Chen · Thin Solid Films · 2008 · 516 · 193110.1016/j.tsf.2007.09.005 ↗
17. Yan · J Eng Mater Technol · 2007 · 129 · 20010.1115/1.2400280 ↗
18. Bocciarelli · Comput Mater Sci · 2007 · 39 · 38110.1016/j.commatsci.2006.07.001 ↗
19. Heerens J, Mubarok F, Huber N. J Mater Res, submitted for publication.
20. Johnson · J Mech Phys Solids · 1970 · 18 · 11510.1016/0022-5096(70)90029-3 ↗
21. Ai · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 76110.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.01.017 ↗
22. Tabor · 2000
23. Tyulyukovskiy · J Mater Res · 2006 · 21 · 66410.1557/jmr.2006.0076 ↗
24. Huber · J Nucl Mater · 2008 · 377 · 35210.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.03.013 ↗
25. Amancio · J Mater Process Technol · 2008
26. Bayraktar · Mater Sci Forum · 2008 · 571–572 · 35510.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.571-572.355 ↗
27. Staron · Appl Phys A · 2002 · 74 · 116110.1007/s003390201830 ↗