EBSD studies of the stress-induced B2–B19′ martensitic transformation in NiTi tubes under uniaxial tension and compression
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In situ electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD) investigations were conducted on polycrystalline NiTi tube specimens during tensile and compressive deformation. The long-range cooperative and catalytic martensitic transformation under tension induces the transformation to proceed in the form of helical Luders band. Propagation of the band is closely related to the spatial distribution of the orientations of individual grains. In uniaxial compression, the larger variation in Schmid factors, and consequently the larger variation in the critical transformation stresses among grains, leads to a homogeneous martensitic transformation, and therefore the absence of the Luders band. To interpret the observed tension–compression asymmetry, a crystallographic model of the critical transformation stress and transformation strain for polycrystalline NiTi under tension and compression is proposed. The model defines three crystallographic regions: tension-favorable, compression-favorable and neutral zones. The orientation population in which tensile strains are larger than compressive strains is much higher than that of orientations with higher compressive strains. For resolved shear stress, orientation populations favoring tension and compression do not show any great difference.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Intermetallics and Advanced Alloy Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Orgeas · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 557910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00167-0 ↗
2. Mao · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 498 · 27810.1016/j.msea.2008.07.072 ↗
3. Shaw · J Mech Phys Solids · 1995 · 43 · 124310.1016/0022-5096(95)00024-D ↗
4. Shaw · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 68310.1016/S1359-6454(96)00189-9 ↗
5. Shaw · Int J Plast · 2000 · 16 · 54110.1016/S0749-6419(99)00075-3 ↗
6. Liu · Mater Sci Eng A · 1999 · 271 · 50610.1016/S0921-5093(98)01022-3 ↗
7. Shaw · Int J Plast · 1998 · 13 · 83710.1016/S0749-6419(97)00062-4 ↗
8. Pieczyska · Exp Mech · 2006 · 46 · 53110.1007/s11340-006-8351-y ↗
9. Li · Int J Plast · 2002 · 18 · 148110.1016/S0749-6419(02)00026-8 ↗
10. Mao · Mater Lett · 2005 · 59 · 356710.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.029 ↗
11. Mao · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 101 · 103522-110.1063/1.2722239 ↗
12. Mao SC, Han XD, Zhang Z, Wu MH. In: Berg B, Mitchell MR, Proft J, editors. Proceedings of the international conference on shape memory and superelastic technologies. Pacific Grove (CA); 2006. p. 749–56.
13. Mao SC, Han XD, Zhang Z, Wu MH. In: Miyazaki S, editor. Proceedings of the international conference on shape memory and superelastic technologies. Tsukuba (Japan); 2007. p. 183–92.
14. Luo · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 102 · 043526-1
15. Sittner · Mech Phys Solids · 2005 · 53 · 171910.1016/j.jmps.2005.03.005 ↗
16. Sittner · Int J Plast · 2000 · 16 · 124310.1016/S0749-6419(00)00009-7 ↗
17. Novak · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 378 · 49010.1016/j.msea.2003.10.370 ↗
18. Matsumoto · Acta Metall · 1987 · 35 · 213710.1016/0001-6160(87)90042-3 ↗
19. Eshelby · Proc Soc A · 1957 · 241 · 376
20. Eshelby · Prog Solid Mech · 1961 · 2 · 89
21. Deng Y. Doctoral thesis, Troy (NY). Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; 1984.
22. Ling · Acta Metall · 1981 · 29 · 172110.1016/0001-6160(81)90006-7 ↗
23. Wu · J ASTM Int · 2009 · 6 · 110.1520/JAI102400 ↗
24. Wollants · Z Metallkd · 1979 · 70 · 113
25. Favier · Solid Mech Appl · 2001 · 101 · 205
26. Novák · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 19910.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.019 ↗
27. Frick · Metall Mater Trans A · 2004 · 35 · 201310.1007/s11661-004-0150-4 ↗
28. Robertson · J Mater Sci · 2006 · 41 · 62110.1007/s10853-006-6478-y ↗