Five-parameter grain boundary distribution of commercially grain boundary engineered nickel and copper
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The five-parameter grain boundary distributions of grain boundary engineered nickel and copper specimens have been analyzed in detail. The relative areas of {1 1 1} planes in the entire population did not increase as a result of grain boundary engineering (GBE) and, in the Σ3-excluded population, decreased after GBE. This decrease occurred because the majority of the newly generated Σ3 grain boundaries were not coherent twins with {1 1 1} grain boundary plane orientations. GBE increased the proportion of Σ3 boundary length that was vicinal-to-{1 1 1} and the proportion of asymmetrical 〈1 1 0〉 tilt boundaries. There was a clear propensity for selection of particular planes or plane combinations which were associated with low energy. These plane types were analyzed in some detail, and it was shown that many of these boundaries were asymmetrical tilts comprising (or vicinal to) at least one low-index plane.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels · Fatigue and fracture mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Randle · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.031 ↗
2. Viewpoint set no. 40, Scripta Mater Grain Boundary Engineering. In: Kumar M, Schuh CA, editors. vol. 54; 2006. p. 961.10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.059 ↗
3. Palumbo P. International Patent Classification C21D 8/00 8/10 C22F 1/10 1/08, no. WO 94/14986; 1994.
4. Randle · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 418710.1016/S1359-6454(99)00277-3 ↗
5. Reed · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 102910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.045 ↗
6. Schuh · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 102310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.044 ↗
7. Randle · Philos Mag · 1999 · 79A · 30510.1080/01418619908210299 ↗
8. Wolf · Philos Mag · 1992 · 66A · 99110.1080/01418619208248003 ↗
9. Saylor · Metall Mater Trans · 2003 · 34A · 1
10. Saylor · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 366310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00181-2 ↗
11. Saylor · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 364910.1016/j.actamat.2004.04.018 ↗
12. Randle · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 448910.1016/j.actamat.2005.11.046 ↗
13. .
14. Was · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 104710.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.051 ↗
15. Tan · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 371 · 17110.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.05.002 ↗
16. Wolf · Acta Metall Mater · 1990 · 38 · 79110.1016/0956-7151(90)90031-B ↗
17. Merkle · Philos Mag · 1992 · 65A · 51310.1080/01418619208201536 ↗
18. Randle · J Mater Sci · 2005 · 40 · 324310.1007/s10853-005-2692-2 ↗
19. Gertsman · Acta Cryst · 2001 · A57 · 64910.1107/S0108767301009102 ↗
20. Sukholmin · Phys Status Solidi · 1983 · 78A · 333