First-principles calculations of transition metal–solute interactions with point defects in tungsten
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The interactions of solute atoms with point defects can modify the microstructure of materials and affect microstructural evolution, ultimately leading to macroscopic changes in the mechanical properties of materials. In this paper, we performed a series of first-principles calculations to quantify the intrinsic properties of transition metal (TM) solutes and their interactions with point defects in W, including vacancies and 〈1 1 1〉-crowdions. This work provides good explanations for recent experimental results on the influence of solute on radiation response and might aid future material design regarding the choice of alloy composition. We find that the early TM elements do not segregate together while the late elements tend to accumulate to form small clusters in dilute W alloys. The solute–point defect interactions are mostly attractive with a few exceptions, and can be well understood in terms of the combination of, and competition between, electronic effects and strain-relief effects, which are characterized by the solute electronegativity and atomic size, respectively. Solute atoms with larger electronegativity more favorably bond to the vacancy and the smaller ones prefer to bind to the 〈1 1 1〉-crowdion, and vice versa. The present results, together with previous experimental results, suggest that Re might be a relatively suitable alloying element compared to other possible candidates, and Ta seems suitable for adding in W–Re alloy to adjust the concentration of Re and Os.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Advanced materials and composites · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (54)
Show source-provided references
1. ITER Physics Basis Editors, ITER Physics Expert Group Chairs and Co-Chairs, ITER Joint Central Team and Physics Integration Unit. Nucl Fusion 1999;39:2137.10.1088/0029-5515/39/12/301 ↗
2. Causey · J Nucl Mater · 1999 · 266 · 46710.1016/S0022-3115(98)00538-8 ↗
3. Shu · Nucl Fusion · 2007 · 47 · 20110.1088/0029-5515/47/3/006 ↗
4. Radiat Eff Solids, NATO Sci Ser
5. Wolverton · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 586710.1016/j.actamat.2007.06.039 ↗
6. Shin · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 53110.1016/j.actamat.2009.09.031 ↗
7. Shin · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 68010.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.032 ↗
8. Saal · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 515110.1016/j.actamat.2012.06.016 ↗
9. Domain · J Nucl Mater · 2006 · 351 · 110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.025 ↗
10. Ohnuma · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 594710.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.020 ↗
11. Olsson · Phys Rev B · 2010 · 81 · 05410210.1103/PhysRevB.81.054102 ↗
12. Gorbatov · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 419 · 24810.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.002 ↗
13. Becquart · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 385 · 22310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.027 ↗
14. Becquart · J Nucl Mater · 2010 · 403 · 7510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.06.003 ↗
15. Kong · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 430 · 27010.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.07.008 ↗
16. Muzyk · Phys Rev B · 2011 · 84 · 10411510.1103/PhysRevB.84.104115 ↗
17. Muzyk · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 2011 · 1298 · 4910.1557/opl.2011.393 ↗
18. Becquart · Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci · 2012 · 16 · 11510.1016/j.cossms.2012.01.001 ↗
19. Mutoh · J Mater Sci · 1995 · 30 · 77010.1007/BF00356341 ↗
20. Gilbert · Nucl Fusion · 2011 · 51 · 04300510.1088/0029-5515/51/4/043005 ↗
21. Fukuzumi · J Nucl Mater · 2005 · 343 · 30810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.11.019 ↗
22. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 47 · 55810.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
23. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
24. Blöchl · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 50 · 1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
25. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 46 · 66
26. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1993 · 48 · 497810.1103/PhysRevB.48.4978.2 ↗
27. Wollenberger · 1983
28. Nguyen-Manh · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 02010110.1103/PhysRevB.73.020101 ↗
29. Becquart · Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect B · 2007 · 255 · 2310.1016/j.nimb.2006.11.006 ↗
30. Ahlgren · J Appl Phys · 2010 · 107 · 03351610.1063/1.3298466 ↗
31. Ventelon · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 425 · 1610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.08.024 ↗
32. Tang · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 335310.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.014 ↗
33. Barbu · Philos Mag A · 1996 · 74 · 70910.1080/01418619608243537 ↗
34. Le Claire · 1970 · vol. 10
35. Huang · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 198210.1016/j.actamat.2009.11.041 ↗
36. Janotti · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 92 · 08590110.1103/PhysRevLett.92.085901 ↗
37. Krcmar · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 236910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.044 ↗
38. Mundy · Phys Rev B · 1978 · 18 · 656610.1103/PhysRevB.18.6566 ↗
39. Arkhipova · Phys Rev B · 1984 · 30 · 178810.1103/PhysRevB.30.1788 ↗
40. Barone · J Chem Phys · 1996 · 105 · 1100710.1063/1.472900 ↗
41. Watson · Phys Rev B · 1978 · 18 · 643910.1103/PhysRevB.18.6439 ↗
42. Romaner · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 104 · 19550310.1103/PhysRevLett.104.195503 ↗
43. Rieth · J Nucl Mater · 2005 · 342 · 2010.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.03.013 ↗
44. Setyawan · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 66 · 55810.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.01.002 ↗
45. Nemoto · J Nucl Mater · 2000 · 283–287 · 114410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00290-7 ↗
46. Luo · Phys Rev C · 2009 · 79 · 05760310.1103/PhysRevC.79.057603 ↗
47. Cottrell · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 367–370 · 60310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.103 ↗
48. Rieth · Adv Sci Tech · 2010 · 73 · 1110.4028/www.scientific.net/AST.73.11 ↗
49. Li · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 74810.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.031 ↗
50. Aguirre · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 417 · 51610.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.120 ↗
51. He · J Nucl Mater · 2008 · 377 · 34810.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.03.014 ↗
52. Smid · J Nucl Mater · 1998 · 258–263 · 16010.1016/S0022-3115(98)00358-4 ↗
53. Zayachuk · Nucl Fusion · 2013 · 53 · 01301310.1088/0029-5515/53/1/013013 ↗
54. Rowcliffe AF. Semiannual progress report DOE-ER-0313 2010;48:76.