journal article·2014-06Open access

Measuring the critical resolved shear stresses in Mg alloys by instrumented nanoindentation

R. Sánchez-Martín, M.T. Pérez-Prado, J. Segurado, J. Bohlen, I. Gutiérrez-Urrutia, J. Llorca, J.M. Molina-Aldareguia

Acta Materialia· Volume 71

Abstract

One of the main limiting factors in the development of new magnesium (Mg) alloys with enhanced mechanical behavior is the need to use vast experimental campaigns for microstructure and property screening. For example, the influence of new alloying additions on the critical resolved shear stresses (CRSSs) is currently evaluated by a combination of macroscopic single-crystal experiments and crystal plasticity finite-element simulations (CPFEM). This time-consuming process could be considerably simplified by the introduction of high-throughput techniques for efficient property testing. The aim of this paper is to propose a new and fast, methodology for the estimation of the CRSSs of hexagonal close-packed metals which, moreover, requires small amounts of material. The proposed method, which combines instrumented nanoindentation and CPFEM modeling, determines CRSS values by comparison of the variation of hardness (H) for different grain orientations with the outcome of CPFEM. This novel approach has been validated in a rolled and annealed pure Mg sheet, whose H variation with grain orientation has been successfully predicted using a set of CRSSs taken from recent crystal plasticity simulations of single-crystal experiments. Moreover, the proposed methodology has been utilized to infer the effect of the alloying elements of an MN11 (Mg–1% Mn–1% Nd) alloy. The results support the hypothesis that selected rare earth intermetallic precipitates help to bring the CRSS values of basal and non-basal slip systems closer together, thus contributing to the reduced plastic anisotropy observed in these alloys
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. Easton · J Met · 2008 · 60 · 57
2. Bamberger · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 50510.1146/annurev.matsci.020408.133717 ↗
3. Schmid · Z Elektrochem · 1931 · 37 · 447
4. Bakarian · Trans AIME · 1943 · 152 · 226
5. Conrad · Trans AIME · 1957 · 209 · 503
6. Reed-Hill · Trans AIME · 1957 · 496 · 496
7. Ward · Trans AIME · 1961 · 221 · 1148
8. Byer · Scr Mater · 2010 · 62 · 53610.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.12.017 ↗
9. Graff · Int J Plast · 2007 · 23 · 195710.1016/j.ijplas.2007.07.009 ↗
10. Zhang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2012 · 60 · 94510.1016/j.jmps.2012.01.005 ↗
11. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
12. Jin · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 197010.1016/j.msea.2009.11.047 ↗
13. Bohlen · Scr Mater · 2005 · 53 · 25910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.03.036 ↗
14. Sadeghi · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 167810.1016/j.msea.2010.10.096 ↗
15. Del Valle · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 355 · 6810.1016/S0921-5093(03)00043-1 ↗
16. Styczynski · Scr Mater · 2004 · 50 · 94310.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.01.010 ↗
17. Chino · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 485 · 31110.1016/j.msea.2007.07.076 ↗
18. Al-Samman · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 345010.1016/j.msea.2010.02.008 ↗
19. Ulacia · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 298810.1016/j.actamat.2010.01.029 ↗
20. Bohlen · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 210110.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.013 ↗
21. Mishra · Scr Mater · 2008 · 59 · 56210.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.05.019 ↗
22. Bohlen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 709210.1016/j.msea.2010.07.081 ↗
23. Hidalgo-Manrique · Metall Mater Trans A · 2013 · 44 · 481910.1007/s11661-013-1823-7 ↗
24. Robson · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 724710.1016/j.msea.2011.05.075 ↗
25. Sandlöbes · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 42910.1016/j.actamat.2010.08.031 ↗
26. Yasi · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 565210.1016/j.actamat.2011.05.040 ↗
27. Segurado · Comput Mater Sci · 2013 · 76 · 310.1016/j.commatsci.2013.03.008 ↗
28. Fernández · Int J Plast · 2011 · 27 · 173910.1016/j.ijplas.2011.05.002 ↗
29. Yoshinaga · Trans Jpn Inst Met · 1963 · 4 · 13410.2320/matertrans1960.4.134 ↗
30. Hirsch · Philos Mag · 1965 · 12 · 59510.1080/14786436508218903 ↗
31. Stanford · Int J Plast · 2013 · 47 · 16510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.012 ↗
32. Li · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 755510.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.042 ↗
33. Herrera-Solaz · Int J Plast · 2014 · 57 · 110.1016/j.ijplas.2014.02.001 ↗
34. Qiao · Mater Sci Eng A · 2013 · 568 · 20210.1016/j.msea.2013.01.036 ↗
35. Oliver · J Mater Res · 1992 · 7 · 156410.1557/JMR.1992.1564 ↗
36. Lee · J Appl Mech · 1969 · 36 · 110.1115/1.3564580 ↗
37. Peirce · Acta Metall · 1983 · 31 · 195110.1016/0001-6160(83)90014-7 ↗
38. Asaro · Acta Metall · 1985 · 33 · 92310.1016/0001-6160(85)90188-9 ↗
39. Hutchinson · Proc Roy Soc Lond A · 1976 · 348 · 100110.1098/rspa.1976.0027 ↗
40. ABAQUS/Standard V6.10 user’s manual. ABAQUS Inc., Richmond, USA; 2009.
41. Bhattacharya · Int J Solids Struct · 1988 · 24 · 88110.1016/0020-7683(88)90039-X ↗
42. Pharr · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2010 · 40 · 27110.1146/annurev-matsci-070909-104456 ↗
43. Hutchinson · Solids Struct · 2000 · 37 · 22510.1016/S0020-7683(99)00090-6 ↗
44. Nix · J Mech Phys Solids · 1998 · 46 · 41110.1016/S0022-5096(97)00086-0 ↗
45. Poole · Scr Mater · 1996 · 34 · 55910.1016/1359-6462(95)00524-2 ↗
46. Britton · Proc Roy Soc A: Math Phys Eng Sci · 2010 · 466 · 69510.1098/rspa.2009.0455 ↗
47. Bettles · 2012
48. Shin · Scr Mater · 2013 · 68 · 48310.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.11.030 ↗
49. Lebensohn · Philos Mag A · 1993 · 67 · 18710.1080/01418619308207151 ↗
50. Zhang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 473 · 13910.1016/j.msea.2007.04.021 ↗
51. Meyers · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 402510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00300-7 ↗
52. Tsuru · J Phys: Condens Matter · 2013 · 25 · 22202
53. Chino · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 494 · 34310.1016/j.msea.2008.04.059 ↗