Heterogeneous nucleation on potent spherical substrates during solidification
Source abstract
Abstract
For a spherical-cap nucleus to become a “transformation nucleus”, the linear dimension (d) of the flat substrate must exceed the critical nucleus size (2r*). This Turnbull criterion (d greater-or-equal, slanted 2r*) defines a minimum undercooling for grain formation on, and effective inoculation with, flat nucleating substrates. However, for nucleation on potent substrates the spherical-cap model is no longer tenable. The free growth model has in general considered the growth of a two-dimensional nucleus on a potent flat substrate. Inspired by the particle-core structures observed in magnesium alloys after inoculation with nearly spherical zirconium particles, a model has been proposed, on the basis of an adsorption and surface diffusion mechanism, for heterogeneous nucleation and grain formation on potent spherical substrates of d greater-or-equal, slanted 2r*. The critical undercooling required is found to be approximately the same as that defined by Turnbull’s patch nucleation theory. The model shows excellent agreement with experiments compared from different perspectives.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Solidification and crystal growth phenomena · nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Kelton · MRS Bull · 2004 · 30 · 904
2. Perepezko · 1988 · vol. 15 · 101
3. Turnbull · Acta Metall · 1953 · 1 · 810.1016/0001-6160(53)90004-2 ↗
4. Cahn · 1987 · 41
5. Volmer · Z. Elektrochem · 1929 · 35 · 555
6. Greer · Phil Trans R Soc Lond A · 2003 · 361 · 47910.1098/rsta.2002.1147 ↗
7. Fletcher · J Chem Phys · 1958 · 29 · 57210.1063/1.1744540 ↗
8. Turnbull · J Chem Phys · 1950 · 18 · 19810.1063/1.1747588 ↗
9. Chalmers · 1964
10. Shewmon · 1969
11. Yang · Acta Metall · 1954 · 2 · 46210.1016/0001-6160(54)90067-X ↗
12. Walton · J Chem Phys · 1962 · 37 · 218210.1063/1.1732985 ↗
13. Sundquist · Acta Metall · 1963 · 11 · 63010.1016/0001-6160(63)90102-0 ↗
14. Cantor · Phil Trans R Soc Lond A · 2003 · 361 · 40910.1098/rsta.2002.1137 ↗
15. Talanquer · Physica A · 1995 · 220 · 7410.1016/0378-4371(95)00134-S ↗
16. Wang · J Chem Phys · 2004 · 121 · 110510.1063/1.1761053 ↗
17. Muller · Comput Phys Commun · 2002 · 147 · 29210.1016/S0010-4655(02)00290-4 ↗
18. Maxwell · Acta Metall · 1975 · 23 · 22910.1016/0001-6160(75)90188-1 ↗
19. Krasztanov · IDOJARAS (Q J Hungarian Meteorol Services) · 1957 · 61 · 333
20. Kuni · Adv Colloid Interface Sci · 1996 · 65 · 7110.1016/0001-8686(96)00290-4 ↗
21. Bykov · J Chem Phys · 2002 · 117 · 185110.1063/1.1485733 ↗
22. Adamson · 1997
23. Perepezko · Metall Mater Trans A · 1996 · 27A · 53310.1007/BF02648944 ↗
24. Qian · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 46 · 64910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00046-5 ↗
25. Qian · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 111510.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.01.026 ↗
26. Lide · 2003
27. Lee · Metall Mater Trans A · 2000 · 31A · 289510.1007/BF02830349 ↗
28. Qian · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 88110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.002 ↗
29. Qian · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 224110.1016/j.actamat.2006.01.022 ↗
30. Cao · Mater Sci Technol · 2004 · 20 · 58510.1179/026708304225012314 ↗
31. Kim · Acta Metall Mater · 1994 · 42 · 311510.1016/0956-7151(94)90409-X ↗
32. Hollomon · Prog Met Phys · 1953 · 4 · 33310.1016/0502-8205(53)90020-3 ↗
33. Mullins · J Appl Phys · 1963 · 34 · 32310.1063/1.1702607 ↗
34. Miedema · Z Metallkd · 1979 · 70 · 14
35. Johnsson · Metall Mater Trans A · 1993 · 24 · 48110.1007/BF02657335 ↗
36. Okamoto · J Phase Equilib · 2002 · 23 · 19810.1361/1054971023603991 ↗
37. Qian · J Light Met · 2001 · 1 · 15710.1016/S1471-5317(01)00009-8 ↗
38. Poirier · 1994
39. Qian · 2003 · 209
40. Flood · 1998 · vol. 15