Effects of residual S on Kirkendall void formation at Cu/Sn–3.5Ag solder joints
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Solder joints of Cu/Sn–3.5Ag were prepared using Cu foil or electroplated Cu films with or without SPS additive. With a high level of SPS in the Cu electroplating bath, voids tended to localize at the Cu/Cu 3 Sn interface during subsequent aging at 150 °C, which was highly detrimental to the drop impact resistance of the solder joints. In situ Auger electron spectroscopy of fractured joints revealed S segregation on the Cu/Cu 3 Sn interface and void surfaces, suggesting that segregation of S to the Cu/Cu 3 Sn interface lowered interface energy and thereby the free energy barrier for Kirkendall void nucleation. Once nucleated, voids can grow by local tensile stress, originating from residual stress in the film and/or the Kirkendall effect. Vacancy annihilation at the Cu/Cu 3 Sn interface can induce tensile stress which drives the Kirkendall void growth.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic Packaging and Soldering Technologies · 3D IC and TSV technologies · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Tu · Acta Metall · 1982 · 30 · 94710.1016/0001-6160(82)90201-2 ↗
2. Onishi · Trans Jpn Inst Met · 1975 · 16 · 53910.2320/matertrans1960.16.539 ↗
3. Sohn · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 242810.1557/JMR.2004.0297 ↗
4. Song · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 125710.1557/JMR.2004.0163 ↗
5. Jee · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 187910.1557/jmr.2007.0234 ↗
6. Balluffi · Acta Metall · 1954 · 2 · 19410.1016/0001-6160(54)90159-5 ↗
7. Zeng · Mater Sci Eng R · 2002 · 38 · 110.1016/S0927-796X(02)00007-4 ↗
8. Chiu TC, Zeng K, Stierman R, Edwards D, Ano K. In: Proceedings of ECTC 2004 international conference, Las Vegas, NV; 2004. p. 1256.
9. Yang · J Electron Mater · 1994 · 23 · 76510.1007/BF02651371 ↗
10. Laurila · Mater Sci Eng R · 2005 · 49 · 110.1016/j.mser.2005.03.001 ↗
11. Zeng · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 97 · 02450810.1063/1.1839637 ↗
12. Kim · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 92 · 09210910.1063/1.2890072 ↗
13. Kim JY, Yu J. in preparation.
14. Uedono · J Appl Phys · 2004 · 95 · 91310.1063/1.1635648 ↗
15. Stangl · Microelectr Eng · 2007 · 84 · 5410.1016/j.mee.2006.08.004 ↗
16. Kim · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 77010.1557/jmr.2007.0085 ↗
17. Singh · J Vac Sci Technol · 1980 · 17 · 2910.1116/1.570418 ↗
18. Militzer · Scr Mater · 1994 · 31 · 150110.1016/0956-716X(94)90064-7 ↗
19. Hofmann · Anal Chem · 1985 · 57 · 71610.1021/ac00280a031 ↗
20. Menyhard · Surf Sci · 1991 · 258 · L68310.1016/0039-6028(91)90890-5 ↗
21. Briggs · 1983
22. Guttmann · Surf Sci · 1975 · 53 · 21310.1016/0039-6028(75)90125-9 ↗
23. McMahon · J Vac Sci Technol · 1978 · 15 · 45010.1116/1.569592 ↗
24. Smithells · 1991
25. Rice JR. In: Dourdan S, Nemat-Nassar, editors. Proceedings of IUTAM symposium on 3-D constitutive relationships and ductile failure. Dordrecht: Martinus Nordhoff; 1981.
26. Raj · Acta Metall · 1975 · 23 · 65310.1016/0001-6160(75)90047-4 ↗
27. Riedel · 1987
28. Bonzel · J Chem Phys · 1973 · 59 · 164110.1063/1.1680245 ↗
29. Kim · Electrochim Acta · 2007 · 52 · 525810.1016/j.electacta.2007.02.040 ↗
30. Nix · Metall Trans A · 1989 · 20 · 221710.1007/BF02666659 ↗
31. Chen · J Mater Process Tech · 2006 · 171 · 12510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.06.061 ↗
32. Shewmon · 1989
33. Glickman · 2000
34. Sutton · 1995
35. Paul · Z Metallkd · 2004 · 95 · 91310.3139/146.018032 ↗
36. Balluffi · 1979 · vol. 4
37. Hirth · 1982