journal article·2008-06

Structure and stacking faults in layered Mg–Zn–Y alloys: A first-principles study

Aditi Datta, U.V. Waghmare, U. Ramamurty

Acta Materialia· Volume 56· Issue 11
Publisher page

Abstract

We use first-principles density functional theory total energy calculations based on pseudo-potentials and plane- ave basis to assess stability of the periodic structures with different stacking sequences in Mg–Zn–Y alloys. For pure Mg, we find that the 6-layer $(6l)$ structure with the ABACAB stacking is most stable after the lowest energy hcp $(2l)$ structure with ABAB stacking. Addition of 2 at.% Y leads to stabilization of the structure to $6l$ sequence whereas the addition of 2 at.% Zn makes the $6l$ energetically comparable to that of the hcp.Stacking fault (SF) on the basal plane of $6l$ structure is higher in energy than that of the hcp $2l$ Mg, which further increases upon Y doping and decreases significantly with Zn doping. SF energy surface for the prismatic slip indicates activation of non-basal slip in alloys with a $6l$ structure. Charge density analysis shows that the $2l$ and $6l$ structures are electronically similar which might be a cause for better stability of $6l$ structure over a $4l$ sequence or other periodic structures. Thus, in an Mg–Zn–Y alloy, Y stabilizes the long periodicity,while its mechanical properties are further improved due to Zn doping.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Hydrogen Storage and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Ping · Phil Mag Lett · 2002 · 82 · 54310.1080/0950083021000018652 ↗
2. Inoue · J Mater Res · 2001 · 16 · 189410.1557/JMR.2001.0260 ↗
3. Amiya · Mater Trans · 2003 · 44 · 215110.2320/matertrans.44.2151 ↗
4. Suzuki · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 48 · 99710.1016/S1359-6462(02)00590-0 ↗
5. Abe · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 384510.1016/S1359-6454(02)00191-X ↗
6. Singh · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 108310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.06.041 ↗
7. Men · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 46 · 69910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00055-6 ↗
8. Schuh · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 406710.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.052 ↗
9. Kawamura · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 45310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.05.011 ↗
10. Luo · Mater Sci Lett · 2000 · 19 · 81310.1023/A:1006793411506 ↗
11. Itoi · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 51 · 10710.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.04.003 ↗
12. Matsuda · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 393 · 26910.1016/j.msea.2004.10.040 ↗
13. Kawamura · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 298610.2320/matertrans.MER2007142 ↗
14. Matsuda · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 386 · 44710.1016/j.msea.2004.08.006 ↗
15. Matsuda · Mater Trans · 2005 · 46 · 36110.2320/matertrans.46.361 ↗
16. Gonze · Comput Mater Sci · 2002 · 25 · 47810.1016/S0927-0256(02)00325-7 ↗
17. Bader · 1990
18. Datta · Comput Mater Sci · 2006 · 37 · 6910.1016/j.commatsci.2005.12.020 ↗
19. Hirth · 1982
20. Chetty · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 56 · 1084410.1103/PhysRevB.56.10844 ↗
21. Mehl · Phys Rev B · 2000 · 61 · 489410.1103/PhysRevB.61.4894 ↗
22. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
23. Zimmerman · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2000 · 8 · 10310.1088/0965-0393/8/2/302 ↗
24. Waghmare · Phys Status Solidi (b) · 2000 · 217 · 54510.1002/(SICI)1521-3951(200001)217:1<545::AID-PSSB545>3.0.CO;2-N ↗
25. Gotsis · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 13410110.1103/PhysRevB.65.134101 ↗
26. Eberhart · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 249510.1016/1359-6454(95)00347-9 ↗
27. Ogata · Science · 2002 · 298 · 80710.1126/science.1076652 ↗
28. Kioussis · Phys Rev Lett · 2002 · 88 · 12550110.1103/PhysRevLett.88.125501 ↗