The effect of high yttrium solute concentration on the twinning behaviour of magnesium alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The deformation behaviour of two single phase binary alloys, Mg–5Y and Mg–10Y, have been examined. In compression, two twin types were observed, the common { 1 0 1 ¯ 2 } twin as well as the less common { 1 1 2 ¯ 1 } extension twin. It is shown that the { 1 1 2 ¯ 1 } twin is much less sensitive to solute concentration than the { 1 0 1 ¯ 2 } twin, and it is suggested that the simple atomic shuffle of the { 1 1 2 ¯ 1 } twin reduces the solute strengthening imparted by Y additions. The common { 1 0 1 ¯ 2 } twin showed significant hardening as a result of alloying with Y. An analysis of solute behaviour has indicated that of the four chemical parameters investigated, i.e. atomic size, shear modulus, electronegativity and solute distribution, it appears to be the larger atomic radius of Y compared to Mg that increases the stress required to activate the { 1 0 1 ¯ 2 } twin. It is suggested that the large atomic radius inhibits the atomic shuffling process which accompanies the twinning shear in this twin type.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Polmear · 1995
2. Bettles · 2013
3. Emley · 1966
4. Koike · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 205510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00005-3 ↗
5. Agnew · Int. J. Plast. · 2005 · 21 · 116110.1016/j.ijplas.2004.05.018 ↗
6. Akhtar · Acta Metall. · 1969 · 17 · 133910.1016/0001-6160(69)90151-5 ↗
7. Akhtar · Acta Metall. · 1969 · 17 · 135110.1016/0001-6160(69)90152-7 ↗
8. Kelley · Trans. AIME · 1968 · 242 · 5
9. Reed-Hill · Trans. AIME · 1957 · 209 · 496
10. Chapuis · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 198610.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.064 ↗
11. Kelley · Trans. AIME · 1968 · 242 · 654
12. Agnew · Scr. Mater. · 2003 · 48 · 100310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00591-2 ↗
13. Agnew · Acta Mater. · 2006 · 54 · 484110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.020 ↗
14. Brown · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 399 · 110.1016/j.msea.2005.02.016 ↗
15. Gharghouri · Philos. Mag. A · 1999 · 79 · 167110.1080/01418619908210386 ↗
16. Stanford · Scr. Mater. · 2012 · 67 · 70410.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.06.035 ↗
17. Stanford · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 21810.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.001 ↗
18. Stanford · Int. J. Plast. · 2013 · 47 · 16510.1016/j.ijplas.2013.01.012 ↗
19. Agnew · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 376910.1016/j.actamat.2013.03.010 ↗
20. Eckelmeyer · Met. Trans. · 1970 · 1 · 341110.1007/BF03037872 ↗
21. Chang · Mater. Trans. · 2001 · 47 · 133210.2320/matertrans.42.1332 ↗
22. Vander Voort · 1999
23. Cáceres · J. Light Metals · 2001 · 1 · 15110.1016/S1471-5317(01)00008-6 ↗
24. Stanford · Philos. Mag. Lett. · 2008 · 88 · 37910.1080/09500830802070793 ↗
25. Fleischer · Acta Metall. · 1963 · 11 · 20310.1016/0001-6160(63)90213-X ↗
26. Honeycombe · 1984
27. Labusch · Phys. Status Solidi · 1970 · 41 · 65910.1002/pssb.19700410221 ↗
28. Hull · 2011
29. Christian · Prog. Mater. Sci. · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
30. Marceau · Acta Mater. · 2010 · 58 · 492310.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.020 ↗
31. Marceau · Acta Mater. · 2013 · 61 · 728510.1016/j.actamat.2013.08.033 ↗
32. W. Curtin, private communication.
33. Khater · Philos. Mag. · 2013 · 93 · 127910.1080/14786435.2013.769071 ↗
34. Nie · Science · 2013 · 340 · 95710.1126/science.1229369 ↗
35. Aylward · 1998
36. Gale · 2004
37. Gault · 2012
38. Lubarda · Mech. Mater. · 2003 · 35 · 5310.1016/S0167-6636(02)00196-5 ↗
39. Hume-Rothery · Proc. R. Soc. A · 1940 · 177 · 2710.1098/rspa.1940.0109 ↗