Direct comparison between hot pressing and electric field-assisted sintering of submicron alumina
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This study compares hot pressing (HP) and the electric field-assisted sintering technique (FAST) of two different electrically insulating Al2O3 submicron powders with median particle sizes of 150 and 500 nm. Sample geometry, heating schedule, applied pressure and atmosphere were identical for both sintering methods. The densification behavior and characterization of the microstructure revealed that FAST sintered samples reached a higher density compared with HP, in particular for the finer powder. It was found that an increase in dwell time was required to reach the same final density by HP. However, analysis of the sintering curves showed that the densification mechanism for both sintering methods was grain boundary diffusion. Increasing the heating rate up to 150 K min−1 did not modify the densification mechanism. The sintering trajectory showed that the grain size was only dependent on density and was insensitive to the sintering method, in addition to showing a lack of preferential grain orientation.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced ceramic materials synthesis · Advanced materials and composites · Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Munir · J Mater Sci · 2006 · 76310.1007/s10853-006-6555-2 ↗
2. Nygren · Key Eng Mater · 2004 · 71910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.264-268.719 ↗
3. Zhou · J Eur Ceram Soc · 2004 · 346510.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2003.10.013 ↗
4. Zhao · Key Eng Mater · 2004 · 229710.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.264-268.2297 ↗
5. Chen · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 132
6. Anselmi-Tamburini · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 2410.1016/j.msea.2005.06.066 ↗
7. Groza · J Mater Res · 2001 · 28610.1557/JMR.2001.0043 ↗
8. Bernard-Granger · Acta Mater · 2007 · 349310.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.048 ↗
9. Chaim · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 7410.1016/j.msea.2006.04.072 ↗
10. Olevsky · J Appl Phys · 2007 · 11491310.1063/1.2822189 ↗
11. Angerer · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 1
12. Stanciu · J Am Ceram Soc · 2007 · 271610.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01778.x ↗
13. Coble · J Appl Phys · 1970 · 479810.1063/1.1658543 ↗
14. Vieira · J Appl Phys · 1984 · 245
15. Rahaman · 2003
16. Zavaliangos · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 21810.1016/j.msea.2004.01.052 ↗
17. Anselmi-Tamburini · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 13910.1016/j.msea.2004.11.019 ↗
18. Vanmeensel · Acta Mater · 2005 · 437910.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.042 ↗
19. Olevsky · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 117510.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.07.009 ↗
20. Carmen · J Am Ceram Soc · 2008 · 3448
21. Mishra · J Mater Res · 1997 · 186
22. Shen · J Am Ceram Soc · 2002 · 192110.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00381.x ↗
23. Wang · J Mater Res · 2001 · 351410.1557/JMR.2001.0482 ↗
24. Guillon · J Am Ceram Soc · 2007 · 139410.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.01565.x ↗
25. Zhang · J Am Ceram Soc · 2006 · 68010.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00722.x ↗
26. Wang · Acta Mater · 2007 · 361110.1016/j.actamat.2007.02.022 ↗
27. Coble · J Am Ceram Soc · 1963 · 43810.1111/j.1151-2916.1963.tb11771.x ↗
28. Montes · Comp Mater Sci · 2006 · 32910.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.008 ↗
29. Helle · Acta Metall · 1985 · 216310.1016/0001-6160(85)90177-4 ↗
30. Zuo · Acta Mater · 2003 · 456310.1016/S1359-6454(03)00293-3 ↗
31. Wang · J Am Ceram Soc · 1991 · 1172
32. Kim · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 60710.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.06.009 ↗
33. Roy · J Eur Ceram Soc · 1993 · 32510.1016/0955-2219(93)90032-M ↗
34. Stanciu · Met Mat Trans A · 2001 · 2632
35. Oh · J Am Ceram Soc · 2000 · 131410.1111/j.1151-2916.2000.tb01380.x ↗
36. Moulson · 2003
37. Chaim · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 2510.1016/j.msea.2006.07.092 ↗
38. Hulbert · J Appl Phys · 2008 · 03330510.1063/1.2963701 ↗
39. Jayaseelan · J Am Ceram Soc · 2002 · 26710.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00079.x ↗
40. Hoffmann · High Temp High Press · 1997 · 70310.1068/htrt115 ↗