Dislocation starvation and exhaustion hardening in Mo alloy nanofibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The evolution of defects in Mo alloy nanofibers with initial dislocation densities ranging from 0 to ∼1.6 × 10 14 m −2 were studied using an in situ “push-to-pull” device in conjunction with a nanoindenter in a transmission electron microscope. Digital image correlation was used to determine stress and strain in local areas of deformation. When they had no initial dislocations the Mo alloy nanofibers suffered sudden catastrophic elongation following elastic deformation to ultrahigh stresses. At the other extreme fibers with a high dislocation density underwent sustained homogeneous deformation after yielding at much lower stresses. Between these two extremes nanofibers with intermediate dislocation densities demonstrated a clear exhaustion hardening behavior, where the progressive exhaustion of dislocations and dislocation sources increases the stress required to drive plasticity. This is consistent with the idea that mechanical size effects (“smaller is stronger”) are due to the fact that nanostructures usually have fewer defects that can operate at lower stresses. By monitoring the evolution of stress locally we find that exhaustion hardening causes the stress in the nanofibers to surpass the critical stress predicted for self-multiplication, supporting a plasticity mechanism that has been hypothesized to account for the rapid strain softening observed in nanoscale bcc materials at high stresses.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Advanced materials and composites · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Rao · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 324510.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.011 ↗
2. Weinberger · PNAS · 2008 · 105 · 1430410.1073/pnas.0806118105 ↗
3. Uchic · Annu Rev Mater Sci · 2009 · 39 · 36110.1146/annurev-matsci-082908-145422 ↗
4. Greer · Prog Mater Sci · 2011 · 56 · 65410.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.01.005 ↗
5. Louchet · Philos Mag A · 1979 · 39 · 43310.1080/01418617908239283 ↗
6. Christian · Metall Trans A · 1983 · 14 · 123710.1007/BF02664806 ↗
7. Seeger · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 386110.1080/14786430500531769 ↗
8. Šesták · Phys Status Solidi B · 1971 · 43 · 43310.1002/pssb.2220430146 ↗
9. Schneider · Philos Mag Lett · 2010 · 90 · 84110.1080/09500839.2010.508445 ↗
10. Uchic · JOM · 2009 · 61 · 3610.1007/s11837-009-0038-2 ↗
11. Shan · Nature Mater · 2008 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
12. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 132810.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.065 ↗
13. Oh · Nature Mater · 2009 · 8 · 9510.1038/nmat2370 ↗
14. Benzerga · J Mech Phys Solids · 2009 · 57 · 145910.1016/j.jmps.2009.06.003 ↗
15. Lee · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 440410.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.002 ↗
16. Lee · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 190310.1016/j.msea.2009.11.020 ↗
17. Ng · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 490210.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.053 ↗
18. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
19. Kiener · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 58010.1016/j.actamat.2007.10.015 ↗
20. Kiener · Nano Lett · 2011
21. Bei · APL · 2007 · 91 · 111915
22. Lowry · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 516010.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.052 ↗
23. Zhu · PNAS · 2005 · 102 · 1450310.1073/pnas.0506544102 ↗
24. Eberl C, Gianola DS, Thompson R. MatLab Central. Natick (MA): The Mathworks Inc.; 2006 (File i.d. 12413).
25. Bei · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 6910.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.003 ↗
26. Phani · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 217210.1016/j.actamat.2010.12.018 ↗
27. Bei · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 476210.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.030 ↗
28. Ham · Philos Mag · 1961 · 6 · 118310.1080/14786436108239679 ↗
29. Guo · Nano Lett · 2011 · 0
30. Johanns K, Sedlmayr A, Sudarshan Phani P, Monig R, Kraft O, George EP, et al. J Mater Res 2011, in press, doi:10.1557/jmr.2011.298.10.1557/jmr.2011.298 ↗