In situ neutron diffraction and polycrystal plasticity modeling of a Mg–Y–Nd–Zr alloy: Effects of precipitation on individual deformation mechanisms
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In situ neutron diffraction compression tests were performed on Mg–Y–Nd–Zr alloy WE43, in the solution heat-treated, peak- and over-aged conditions. The flow curves and internal strain evolutions were modeled using polycrystal plasticity simulation, with the inclusion of an elastic phase to account for the presence of precipitates. The results reveal that prismatic plate-shaped precipitates strongly impede basal slip; the critical resolved shear strength (CRSS) of basal slip increases from 12 to 37 MPa, an increase of over 200%. However, hard deformation modes such as non-basal slip of 〈a〉 dislocations are required for macroscopic yielding. These hard modes are not as strongly affected by aging, with CRSS values which increase from 78 to 92 MPa, an increase of only 18%. The results of the study are consistent with recent modeling of the relative Orowan strengthening of individual deformation modes and the superposition of various strengthening effects (solid solution and precipitation). This finding helps to explain why the age-hardening response of Mg–Y–Nd–Zr alloys is not exceptional. It is concluded that future precipitation-strengthened alloy and process design strategies should focus on promoting high number densities of particles. The effect of aging upon twinning is surprising. The most age-hardened material exhibits more twinning than the solutionized material. To model this behavior using polycrystal plasticity, the critical stress to activate twinning (especially the strain hardening thereof) must be decreased.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications · Hydrogen Storage and Materials · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (43)
Show source-provided references
1. Nie · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 48 · 100910.1016/S1359-6462(02)00497-9 ↗
2. Clark · Acta Metall · 1968 · 16 · 14110.1016/0001-6160(68)90109-0 ↗
3. Clark · Acta Metall · 1965 · 13 · 128110.1016/0001-6160(65)90039-8 ↗
4. Nie · Scripta Mater · 1999 · 40 · 108910.1016/S1359-6462(99)00084-6 ↗
5. Nie · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 169110.1016/S1359-6454(00)00013-6 ↗
6. Robson · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 194510.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.060 ↗
7. Robson JD. In: Poole WJ, Kainer KU, editors. Mg2012: 9th international conference on magnesium alloys and their applications; 2012. p. 63–8.
8. Agnew · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 48 · 100310.1016/S1359-6462(02)00591-2 ↗
9. Agnew · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 484110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.020 ↗
10. Muransky · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 496 · 1410.1016/j.msea.2008.07.031 ↗
11. Muransky · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 150310.1016/j.actamat.2009.10.057 ↗
12. Muransky · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 138310.1016/j.msea.2009.10.018 ↗
13. Gharghouri · Philos Mag A · 1999 · 79 · 167110.1080/01418619908210386 ↗
14. Jain · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 62 · 30110.1016/j.scriptamat.2009.11.024 ↗
15. Wu · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 369910.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.006 ↗
16. Robson · Scripta Mater · 2010 · 63 · 82310.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.06.026 ↗
17. Singh A, Osawa Y, Somekawa H, Mukai T. In: Sillekens W, Agnew SR, Neelameggham NR, Mathaudhu SN, editors. Magnesium technology 2011; 2011. p. 239–44.10.1002/9781118062029.ch46 ↗
18. Agnew SR, Polesak FJ, Clausen B. In: Poole WJ, Kainer KU, editors. Mg2012: 9th international conference on magnesium alloys and their applications; 2012. p. 297–304.
19. Polesak FJ. MS thesis. University of Virginia; 2011.
20. http://www.magnesium-elektron.com/data/downloads/DS467WE43.pdf.
21. Rzychon · J Achievements Mater Manuf Eng · 2007 · 21 · 31
22. Bourke · Appl Phys A · 2002 · 74 · 3
23. Clausen · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 12310.1016/S1359-6462(03)00237-9 ↗
24. Clausen B. SMARTSware, Los Alamos National Laboratory, #LA-UR 04-6581 and #LA-CC 04-116; 2004. .
25. Von Dreele · J Appl Cryst · 1982 · 15 · 58110.1107/S0021889882012722 ↗
26. Turner · Acta Metall · 1994 · 42 · 414310.1016/0956-7151(94)90191-0 ↗
27. Clausen · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 245610.1016/j.actamat.2008.01.057 ↗
28. Neil · Int J Plasticity · 2010 · 26 · 177210.1016/j.ijplas.2010.03.005 ↗
29. Partridge · Metall Rev · 1967 · 12 · 16910.1179/imr.1967.12.1.169 ↗
30. Brown · Mater Sci Eng A · 2005 · 399 · 110.1016/j.msea.2005.02.016 ↗
31. Aydiner · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 02411310.1103/PhysRevB.80.024113 ↗
32. El Kadiri · J Mech Phys Solids · 2010 · 58 · 61310.1016/j.jmps.2009.12.004 ↗
33. Cáceres · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 621110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00444-0 ↗
34. Muransky · Int J Plasticity · 2009 · 25 · 110710.1016/j.ijplas.2008.08.002 ↗
35. Wang · J Mech Phys Solids · 2010 · 58 · 59410.1016/j.jmps.2010.01.004 ↗
36. Wollmershauser · Metall Mater Trans A · 2010 · 41A · 121710.1007/s11661-009-9990-2 ↗
37. Mulay · Metall Mater Trans A · 2011 · 42A · 6010.1007/s11661-010-0389-x ↗
38. Jiang · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 77110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.029 ↗
39. Barnett · Mater Sci Eng A · 2007 · 464 · 810.1016/j.msea.2007.02.109 ↗
40. Stanford · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 21810.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.001 ↗
41. Wang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2012 · 555 · 9310.1016/j.msea.2012.06.038 ↗
42. Wollmershauser · Int J Fatigue · 2012 · 36 · 18110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2011.07.008 ↗
43. Mendis · Mater Sci Eng A · 2006 · 435–436 · 1