journal article·2013-04Open access

The formation and evolution of oxide particles in oxide-dispersion-strengthened ferritic steels during processing

Ceri A. Williams, Paulina Unifantowicz, Nadine Baluc, George D.W. Smith, Emmanuelle A. Marquis

Acta Materialia· Volume 61· Issue 6

Abstract

The fabrication of oxide-dispersion-strengthened (ODS) steels is a multi-stage process involving powder ball milling, degassing and consolidation by hot isostatic pressing. Y is introduced by mechanical alloying (MA) with either Y2O3 or Fe2Y so a high density of Y-Ti-O-based oxide nanoparticles is formed. The evolution of ∼2 nm oxide nanoparticles and larger >5 nm grain boundary oxides has been studied at each step of the processing. The nanoparticle dispersions produced in material MA with Fe2Y were comparable to those produced by alloying with Y 2O3. Hence the majority of oxygen which forms the nanoparticles must be incorporated from the atmosphere during MA, rather than being introduced via the alloying additions. During mechanical alloying, a high density of subnanometer particles are formed (2.5 ± 0.5 × 10 24 m-3). The oxygen content of the nanoparticles decreases slightly on annealing, and then the composition of the nanoparticles remains constant throughout subsequent processing stages. The nanoparticle size increases during processing up to ∼2 nm radius, while the number density decreases to 4 ± 0.5 × 1023 m-3. Grain boundary oxides (>5 nm) have a Ti-Cr-O-rich shell, and contain no Y before consolidation, but have similar core composition to the matrix nanoparticles after consolidation. The formation of the larger grain boundary oxides is shown to take place during the degassing and consolidation stages, and this occurs at the expense of the nanoparticles in the matrix. This work provides a mechanistic understanding of the importance of controlling the oxygen content in the powder during MA, and the resulting impact on the formation of the ODS microstructure. © 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fusion materials and technologies · Advanced materials and composites · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (59)

Show source-provided references
1. Kishimoto · Fusion Eng Des · 2006 · 81 · 104510.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.09.049 ↗
2. Yutani · J Nucl Mater · 2007 · 367 · 42310.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.016 ↗
3. Yutani K, Kasada R, Kishimoto H, Kimura A. In: Lott RG, Busby JT, editors. American society for testing and materials special technical publications, vol. 1492. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM; 2008. p. 149.10.1520/STP46570S ↗
4. Odette · Annu Rev Mater Res · 2008 · 38 · 47110.1146/annurev.matsci.38.060407.130315 ↗
5. Sporer · Metal Powder Rep · 1992 · 47 · 63
6. Lucon · Fusion Eng Des · 2002 · 61–2 · 68310.1016/S0920-3796(02)00098-4 ↗
7. Miller · Intermetallics · 2005 · 13 · 38710.1016/j.intermet.2004.07.036 ↗
8. Alinger · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 39210.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.025 ↗
9. Larson · Scr Mater · 2001 · 44 · 35910.1016/S1359-6462(00)00593-5 ↗
10. Williams · J Nucl Mater · 2012 · 67 · 108
11. Sakasegawa · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 384 · 11510.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.11.001 ↗
12. Klimiankou · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 329–333 · 34710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.083 ↗
13. Yamashita · Phil Mag Lett · 2004 · 84 · 52510.1080/09500830412331303609 ↗
14. Oka · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 256310.2320/matertrans.MD200715 ↗
15. Kishimoto · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 386 · 53310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.169 ↗
16. Klimiankou · Micron · 2005 · 36 · 110.1016/j.micron.2004.08.001 ↗
17. Cayron · J Nucl Mater · 2010 · 399 · 21910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.01.023 ↗
18. de Castro · Mater Sci Technol · 2011 · 27 · 71910.1179/1743284710Y.0000000013 ↗
19. Wu · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 345610.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.012 ↗
20. Ribis · Acta Mater · 2012 · 60 · 23810.1016/j.actamat.2011.09.042 ↗
21. Hirata · Nat Mater · 2011 · 10 · 92210.1038/nmat3150 ↗
22. Brandes · J Mater Sci · 2012 · 47 · 391310.1007/s10853-012-6249-x ↗
23. Miller · Mater Sci Eng A—Struct Mater Prop Microstruct Process · 2003 · 353 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(02)00680-9 ↗
24. Miller · J Nucl Mater · 2004 · 329–333 · 33810.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.04.085 ↗
25. Miller · J Nucl Mater · 2006 · 351 · 26110.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.004 ↗
26. Williams · J Nucl Mater · 2010 · 400 · 3710.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.02.007 ↗
27. Marquis · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 18190410.1063/1.3000965 ↗
28. Sakasegawa · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 417 · 22910.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.056 ↗
29. Klimenkov · J Nucl Mater · 2009 · 386 · 55310.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.12.174 ↗
30. Hsiung · Mater Lett · 2010 · 64 · 178210.1016/j.matlet.2010.05.039 ↗
31. Brocq · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 409 · 8010.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.011 ↗
32. Oksiuta · Fusion Eng Des · 2011 · 86 · 241710.1016/j.fusengdes.2011.01.023 ↗
33. Miller · Ultramicroscopy · 2007 · 107 · 76110.1016/j.ultramic.2007.02.023 ↗
34. Miller · 2000
35. Hyde · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 2001 · 650 · R6
36. Williams CA. Atomic scale characterisation of oxide-dispersion-strengthened steels for fusion applications. DPhil thesis. Department of Materials, University of Oxford; 2012.
37. Williams CA, Haley D, Marquis EA, Smith GDW, Moody MP. Ultramicroscopy 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.12.011.10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.12.011 ↗
38. Williams · Mater Res Soc Symp Proc · 2010 · 1289 · 328
39. Hellman · Mater Sci Eng A · 2002 · 327 · 2410.1016/S0921-5093(01)01885-8 ↗
40. Hu · Prog Nucl Energy · 2012 · 57 · 1410.1016/j.pnucene.2011.10.011 ↗
41. Marquis · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 417 · 25710.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.251 ↗
42. Hellman · Microsc Microanal · 2000 · 6 · 43710.1007/S100050010051 ↗
43. Certain · J Nucl Mater · 2010 · 407 · 210.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.002 ↗
44. Williams · J Nucl Mater · 2011 · 412 · 10010.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.02.029 ↗
45. Kluthe · Mat Sci Eng A · 2002 · 327 · 7010.1016/S0921-5093(01)01878-0 ↗
46. Williams CA, Smith GDW, Marquis EA. Ultramicroscopy 2013;10–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.10.003.10.1016/j.ultramic.2012.10.003 ↗
47. Matteucci · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 222910.1016/j.actamat.2006.11.008 ↗
48. Li · Scr Mater · 2010 · 63 · 33210.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.029 ↗
49. Marquis · Mater Today · 2010 · 13 · 3410.1016/S1369-7021(10)70184-X ↗
50. Dutta · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 78510.1016/S1359-6454(00)00389-X ↗
51. Chaplanov · Thin Solid Films · 1986 · 143 · 18710.1016/0040-6090(86)90386-X ↗
52. Johnson · Thin Solid Films · 1993 · 232 · 24510.1016/0040-6090(93)90016-I ↗
53. Kang · Bull Korean Chem Soc · 2005 · 26 · 34510.5012/bkcs.2005.26.2.345 ↗
54. Bhadeshia · Mater Sci Technol · 2000 · 16 · 140410.1179/026708300101507361 ↗
55. Sandim · Mater Sci Forum · 2012 · 715 · 62910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.715-716.629 ↗
56. Hansen · 1958
57. Hin · Phys Rev B · 2009 · 80 · 13411810.1103/PhysRevB.80.134118 ↗
58. Gale W, Totemeier T. Smithells metals reference book. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2004.
59. Hin · Mat Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 205610.1016/j.msea.2010.11.017 ↗