Uniaxial compression of fcc Au nanopillars on an MgO substrate: The effects of prestraining and annealing
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The size-dependent strength of face-centered cubic (fcc) metals, as revealed by uniaxial compression of nanopillars, suggests that plasticity is dislocation source-controlled, with fewer sources in smaller pillars producing a “smaller is stronger” effect. To further investigate this phenomenon we have studied the effects of prestraining and annealing on the deformation properties of [0 0 1] Au nanopillars. By making pillars from an epitaxial film of [0 0 1] Au on [0 0 1] MgO, using focused ion beam machining, we are able to create both puck-shaped pillars that can be stably prestrained and pillars with a high aspect ratio, which can be tested in uniaxial compression. We find that prestraining dramatically reduces the flow strength of nanopillars while annealing restores the strength to the pristine levels. These unusual effects are not seen in bulk fcc metals, which behave in the opposite way. We discuss their possible causes in terms of dislocation densities using transmission electron microscopy.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Nix · Thin Solid Films · 2007 · 515 · 315210.1016/j.tsf.2006.01.030 ↗
2. Eshelby · 1979 · vol. 1
3. Uchic · Science · 2004 · 305 · 98610.1126/science.1098993 ↗
4. Dimiduk · Science · 2006 · 312 · 118810.1126/science.1123889 ↗
5. Greer · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 182110.1016/j.actamat.2004.12.031 ↗
6. Dimiduk · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 406510.1016/j.actamat.2005.05.023 ↗
7. Volkert · Philos Mag · 2006 · 86 · 556710.1080/14786430600567739 ↗
8. Shan · Nat Mater · 2007 · 7 · 11510.1038/nmat2085 ↗
9. Oh · Nat Mater · 2009 · 8 · 9510.1038/nmat2370 ↗
10. Weinberger · Proc Natl Acad Sci USA · 2008 · 105 · 1430410.1073/pnas.0806118105 ↗
11. Rao · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 324510.1016/j.actamat.2008.03.011 ↗
12. Tang · Phys Rev Lett · 2008 · 100 · 18550310.1103/PhysRevLett.100.185503 ↗
13. Weygand · Mater Sci Eng A · 2008 · 483–484 · 18810.1016/j.msea.2006.09.183 ↗
14. Gilman · 1969
15. Greer · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 73 · 24541010.1103/PhysRevB.73.245410 ↗
16. Parthasarathy · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 56 · 31310.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.09.016 ↗
17. Bei · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 476210.1016/j.actamat.2008.05.030 ↗
18. Kim · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 10191610.1063/1.2979684 ↗
19. Kiener · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 14810.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.09.024 ↗
20. Shim · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 50310.1016/j.actamat.2008.09.033 ↗
21. Hirth · 1982
22. Brenner · J Appl Phys · 1956 · 27 · 148410.1063/1.1722294 ↗
23. Motz · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 174410.1016/j.actamat.2008.12.020 ↗
24. Liu · Scripta Mater · 2008 · 60 · 59410.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.020 ↗