Fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth characteristics of nanotwinned copper
Source abstract
Abstract
Recent studies have shown that nano twinned copper (NT Cu) exhibits a combination of high strength and moderate ductility. However, most engineering and structural applications would also require materials to have superior fracture toughness and prolonged subcritical fatigue crack growth life. The current study investigates the effect of twin density on the crack initiation toughness and stable fatigue crack propagation characteristics of NT Cu. Specifically, we examine the effects of tailored density of nanotwins, incorporated into a fixed grain size of ultrafine-grained (UFG) copper with an average grain size of 450 nm, on the onset and progression of subcritical fracture under quasi-static and cyclic loading at room temperature. We show here that processing-induced, initially coherent nanoscale twins in UFG copper lead to a noticeable improvement in damage tolerance under conditions of plane stress. This work strongly suggests that an increase in twin density, at a fixed grain size, is beneficial not only for desirable combinations of strength and ductility but also for enhancing damage tolerance characteristics such as fracture toughness, threshold stress intensity factor range for fatigue fracture and subcritical fatigue crack growth life. Possible mechanistic origins of these trends are discussed, along with issues and challenges in the study of damage tolerance in NT Cu. (C) 2011 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · High-Velocity Impact and Material Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Siegel · Nanostruct Mater · 1995 · 6 · 20510.1016/0965-9773(95)00044-5 ↗
2. Sanders · Acta Mater · 1997 · 45 · 401910.1016/S1359-6454(97)00092-X ↗
3. Gleiter · Acta Mater · 2000 · 48 · 110.1016/S1359-6454(99)00285-2 ↗
4. Wang · Nature · 2002 · 419 · 91210.1038/nature01133 ↗
5. Kumar · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 574310.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.032 ↗
6. Dao · Acta Mater · 2007 · 55 · 404110.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038 ↗
7. Suresh · 1998
8. Hanlon · Scripta Mater · 2003 · 49 · 67510.1016/S1359-6462(03)00393-2 ↗
9. Mishra · Corros Sci · 2004 · 46 · 301910.1016/j.corsci.2004.04.007 ↗
10. Hanlon · Int J Fatigue · 2005 · 27 · 114710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.035 ↗
11. Hanlon · Int J Fatigue · 2005 · 27 · 115910.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.06.036 ↗
12. Schuh · Scripta Mater · 2002 · 46 · 73510.1016/S1359-6462(02)00062-3 ↗
13. Schwaiger · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 515910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00365-3 ↗
14. Suresh · Nature · 2008 · 456 · 71610.1038/456716a ↗
15. Mirshams · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 315 · 2110.1016/S0921-5093(01)01213-8 ↗
16. Callister · 2000
17. Brandes · 1998
18. Andrews · Philoso Mag · 1969 · 19 · 88710.1080/14786436908225855 ↗
19. Pry · Acta Metall · 1954 · 2 · 31810.1016/0001-6160(54)90174-1 ↗
20. Freund · 2003
21. Witney · Scripta Metall Mater · 1995 · 33 · 202510.1016/0956-716X(95)00441-W ↗
22. Agnew · Mater Sci Eng A-Struct · 1998 · 244 · 14510.1016/S0921-5093(97)00689-8 ↗
23. Agnew · J Electron Mater · 1999 · 28 · 103810.1007/s11664-999-0181-0 ↗
24. Mughrabi · Mater Res Soc Symp · 2001 · 634 · B2.1.110.1557/PROC-634-B2.1.1 ↗
25. Hoppel · Philos Mag A · 2002 · 82 · 178110.1080/01418610208235689 ↗
26. Moser · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 115110.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.054 ↗
27. Fan · J Alloys Compd · 2007 · 434 · 29810.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.174 ↗
28. Yang · Metall Mater Trans A · 2008 · 39A · 114510.1007/s11661-008-9487-4 ↗
29. Farkas · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 311510.1016/j.actamat.2005.02.012 ↗
30. Xie JJ, Wu XL, Hong YS. In: Yang W, Geni M, Wang TJ, Zhuang Z, editors. Advances in fracture and materials behavior, Pts. 1 and 2, vol. 33–37. 2008. p. 925–30.
31. Trusov · 1991
32. Karimpoor · Phys Status Sol A · 2006 · 203 · 126510.1002/pssa.200566157 ↗
33. Ovid’ko · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 528610.1016/j.actamat.2010.05.058 ↗
34. Lu · Acta Mater · 2005 · 53 · 216910.1016/j.actamat.2005.01.031 ↗
35. Dao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 542110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.062 ↗
36. Lu · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 106210.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.039 ↗
37. Lu · Science · 2009 · 324 · 34910.1126/science.1159610 ↗
38. Lu · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 516510.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.018 ↗
39. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
40. Shen · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 98910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.033 ↗
41. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
42. Sutton · 1995
43. Shute · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 107310.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.11.049 ↗
44. Tang · Acta Metall Sin · 2009 · 45 · 808
45. Cheng · Phys Rev Lett · 2010 · 104 · 25550110.1103/PhysRevLett.104.255501 ↗
46. Zhou · Model Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2010 · 18 · 06500210.1088/0965-0393/18/6/065002 ↗
47. Zhou · Nanotechnology · 2010 · 21 · 03570610.1088/0957-4484/21/3/035706 ↗
48. Qin · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 621510.1016/j.actamat.2009.08.048 ↗
49. Anderson · 1994
50. Hertzberg · 1996
51. ASTM E399. Standard test method for linear-elastic plane-strain fracture toughness KIC of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2009.
52. Suresh · Metall Trans A · 1985 · 16 · 24910.1007/BF02816051 ↗
53. Shih · J Mech Phys Sol · 1981 · 29 · 30510.1016/0022-5096(81)90003-X ↗
54. Donahue · Int J Fract Mech · 1972 · 8 · 20910.1007/BF00703882 ↗
55. Yoder · Eng Fract Mech · 1979 · 11 · 80510.1016/0013-7944(79)90138-3 ↗
56. Sadananda · Int J Fract · 1977 · 13 · 58510.1007/BF00017294 ↗
57. Forsyth P. Crack propagation. In: Proceedings of cranfield symposium; 1962. p. 76–94.