Experimental investigation of void coalescence in metallic sheets containing laser drilled holes
Source abstract
Abstract
Although important, ductility remains difficult to predict and there is a tremendous need for more precise modelling. Progress in this field is hampered by a lack of quantitative experimental results to assess the validity of these models due to the stochastic nature of ductile fracture. In this paper, tensile tests have been carried out in a scanning electron microscope on model materials made of thin metallic sheets containing laser drilled holes. Depending on the material and hole configuration, different failure modes and strains are observed. The results show the importance of void spacing and orientation, constraining effects, materials yield stress and work hardening rate, and the competition between ductile fracture and shear localization. Finally, it is shown that the Thomason model for void coalescence is not appropriate for predicting fracture of the model material. However, the McClintock model for void growth, and the Brown and Embury and the McClintock models for void coalescence provide relatively good predictions.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metal Forming Simulation Techniques · Laser and Thermal Forming Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Goods · Acta Metall · 1979 · 27 · 110.1016/0001-6160(79)90051-8 ↗
2. Babout · Nucl Instrum Meth B · 2003 · 200 · 30310.1016/S0168-583X(02)01692-0 ↗
3. Argon · Metal Trans A · 1975 · 6A · 82510.1007/BF02672306 ↗
4. Puttick · Philos Mag · 1959 · 4 · 96410.1080/14786435908238272 ↗
5. Floreen · Scripta Metall · 1970 · 4 · 8710.1016/0036-9748(70)90170-5 ↗
6. Cox · Metall Trans · 1974 · 5 · 145710.1007/BF02646633 ↗
7. McClintock · Appl Mech · 1968 · 35 · 36310.1115/1.3601204 ↗
8. Rice · J Mech Phys Solids · 1969 · 20110.1016/0022-5096(69)90033-7 ↗
9. Worswick · J Mech Phys Solids · 1990 · 38 · 60110.1016/0022-5096(90)90025-Y ↗
10. Huang · J Appl Mech · 1991 · 58 · 108410.1115/1.2897686 ↗
11. Gurson · J Eng Mater Tech · 1977 · 99 · 210.1115/1.3443401 ↗
12. Thompson · Metall Trans A · 1987 · 18A · 187710.1007/BF02647017 ↗
13. Knott · Metal Sci · 1980 · 327
14. Park · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 165310.1016/0001-6160(88)90232-5 ↗
15. Marini · Eng Fracture Mech · 1985 · 22 · 98910.1016/0013-7944(85)90038-4 ↗
16. Brown · 1973 · 164
17. Needleman · J Mech Phys Solids · 1984 · 32 · 46110.1016/0022-5096(84)90031-0 ↗
18. Thomason · J Inst Metals · 1968 · 96 · 360
19. Zhang · Int J Fracture · 1994 · 70 · 32110.1007/BF00032450 ↗
20. Pardoen · J Mech Phys Solids · 2000 · 48 · 2467251210.1016/S0022-5096(00)00019-3 ↗
21. Gologanu · Int J Solids Struct · 2001 · 38 · 558110.1016/S0020-7683(00)00354-1 ↗
22. Gologanu · Int J Solids Struct · 2001 · 38 · 559510.1016/S0020-7683(00)00355-3 ↗
23. Benzerga · J Mech Phys Solids · 2002 · 50 · 133110.1016/S0022-5096(01)00125-9 ↗
24. Pineau · Int J Fracture · 2006 · 138 · 13910.1007/s10704-006-0035-1 ↗
25. Pineau · 2007 · vol. 2 · 684797
26. Babout · Acta Mater · 2001 · 49 · 205510.1016/S1359-6454(01)00104-5 ↗
27. Gammage · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 5255526310.1016/j.actamat.2004.07.009 ↗
28. Magnusen · Acta Metall · 1988 · 36 · 150310.1016/0001-6160(88)90217-9 ↗
29. Jia · Int J Solids Struct · 2002 · 39 · 25332545
30. Nagaki · Int J Mech Sci · 1998 · 40 · 21510.1016/S0020-7403(97)00050-7 ↗
31. Weck · Appl Phys A-Mater · 2007 · 86 · 5510.1007/s00339-006-3730-x ↗
32. Thomason · 1990
33. Mulholland · Mater Sci Eng A · 2003 · 360 · 16010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00429-5 ↗
34. Hill · J Mech Phys Solids · 1952 · 1 · 1910.1016/0022-5096(52)90003-3 ↗
35. McClintock · Int J Fracture Mech · 1966 · 2 · 61410.1007/BF00184558 ↗
36. Weck A, Wilkinson DS, Maire E, Toda H. Acta Mater, submitted for publication.