The effect of dislocation density on the interactions between dislocations and twin boundaries in nanocrystalline materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The interactions between dislocations and twin boundaries (TBs) are significantly affected by both intrinsic material properties and extrinsic factors, including stacking fault energy, the energy barriers for dislocation reactions at TBs, twin thickness and applied stress. In this study, dislocation–TB interactions in grains with different dislocation densities were investigated and we conclude that the dislocation density also affects the dislocation–TB interactions. In a twinned grain with a low dislocation density, a dislocation may react with a TB to fully or partially penetrate the TB or to be absorbed by the TB via different dislocation reactions. Alternatively, in a twinned grain with a high dislocation density, dislocations tangle with each other and are pinned at the TBs, thereby making it unfavourable for further dislocation reactions to mediate dislocation penetration across the TB. This leads to an accumulation of dislocations at the TBs, raising the local strain energy, which, in turn, is released by the activation of secondary twins by partial dislocation emissions from the other side of the TB.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties · High Temperature Alloys and Creep
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (53)
Show source-provided references
1. Hirth · 1982
2. Christian · Prog Mater Sci · 1995 · 39 · 110.1016/0079-6425(94)00007-7 ↗
3. Sutton · 1995
4. Lu · Science · 2004 · 304 · 42210.1126/science.1092905 ↗
5. Lu · Science · 2009 · 324 · 34910.1126/science.1159610 ↗
6. Lu · Science · 2009 · 323 · 60710.1126/science.1167641 ↗
7. Shen · Scripta Mater · 2005 · 52 · 98910.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.01.033 ↗
8. Zhao · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 89 · 12190610.1063/1.2356310 ↗
9. Zhao · Adv Mater · 2006 · 18 · 294910.1002/adma.200601472 ↗
10. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2008 · 93 · 04190610.1063/1.2965637 ↗
11. Wang · Mater Sci Eng A · 2010 · 527 · 495910.1016/j.msea.2010.04.036 ↗
12. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 376310.1016/j.actamat.2009.04.020 ↗
13. Sennour · Philos Mag · 2007 · 87 · 146510.1080/14786430601021611 ↗
14. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 94 · 02190910.1063/1.3072801 ↗
15. Li · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 598910.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.007 ↗
16. Sennour · J Mater Sci · 2008 · 43 · 380610.1007/s10853-007-2303-5 ↗
17. Barry · Philos Mag · 1971 · 23 · 72710.1080/14786437108216416 ↗
18. Mahajan · Philos Mag · 1971 · 23 · 78110.1080/14786437108216988 ↗
19. Mahajan · J Phys F · 1972 · 2 · 1910.1088/0305-4608/2/1/006 ↗
20. Mullner · Mater Sci Eng A · 1997 · 230 · 10710.1016/S0921-5093(97)00023-3 ↗
21. Medlin · Philos Mag A · 1997 · 75 · 73310.1080/01418619708207199 ↗
22. Dao · Acta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 542110.1016/j.actamat.2006.06.062 ↗
23. Yamakov · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 413510.1016/S1359-6454(03)00232-5 ↗
24. Jin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 112610.1016/j.actamat.2007.11.020 ↗
25. Jin · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 116310.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.11.072 ↗
26. Jin · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 435810.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.064 ↗
27. Shabib · Acta Mater · 2009 · 57 · 436410.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.028 ↗
28. Zhang · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 84 · 109610.1063/1.1647690 ↗
29. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 88 · 20311210.1063/1.2204760 ↗
30. Afanasyev · Nano Lett · 2007 · 7 · 205610.1021/nl070959l ↗
31. Sansoz · JOM · 2008 · 60 · 7910.1007/s11837-008-0124-x ↗
32. Henager · Scripta Mater · 2004 · 50 · 70110.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.09.002 ↗
33. Froseth · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 586310.1063/1.1835531 ↗
34. Zhu · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 81210.1016/j.actamat.2010.10.028 ↗
35. Zhu · Prog Mater Sci · 2012 · 57 · 110.1016/j.pmatsci.2011.05.001 ↗
36. Kovács · 1973
37. Rice · J Mech Phys Solid · 1992 · 40 · 23910.1016/S0022-5096(05)80012-2 ↗
38. Schoeck · Philos Mag A · 1991 · 63 · 11110.1080/01418619108204596 ↗
39. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 339310.1103/PhysRevB.59.3393 ↗
40. Mishin · Phys Rev B · 2001 · 63 · 22410610.1103/PhysRevB.63.224106 ↗
41. Shabib · Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng · 2009 · 17 · 05500910.1088/0965-0393/17/5/055009 ↗
42. Zhu · Appl Phys Lett · 2004 · 85 · 504910.1063/1.1823042 ↗
43. Zhu · J Appl Phys · 2005 · 98 · 03431910.1063/1.2006974 ↗
44. Zhilyaev · Prog Mater Sci · 2008 · 53 · 89310.1016/j.pmatsci.2008.03.002 ↗
45. Liddicoat · Nat Commun · 2010 · 1 · 6310.1038/ncomms1062 ↗
46. Ni · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 32710.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.10.027 ↗
47. Ni · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 339810.1016/j.msea.2011.01.017 ↗
48. Ni · Mater Sci Eng A · 2011 · 528 · 480710.1016/j.msea.2011.03.007 ↗
49. Wang · Appl Phys Lett · 2009 · 94 · 01190810.1063/1.3065025 ↗
50. Hull · 2011
51. Cao · J Mater Sci · 2010 · 45 · 76510.1007/s10853-009-3998-2 ↗
52. Cao · Acta Mater · 2011 · 59 · 390310.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.015 ↗
53. Wang · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 5210.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.08.032 ↗