journal article·2015-10

Using ecological reducing agents instead of sodium sulphide in dyeing with CI Sulphur Black 1

Jiming Yao, Chunxiao Dou, Sainan Wei, Mingyuan Zheng

Coloration Technology· Volume 131· Issue 5
Publisher page

Abstract

Although low‐cost sodium sulphide is used as a reducing agent in most sulphur dyeing processes, it is considered to be environmentally unfavourable because of the resultant contaminated wastewater and the toxic hydrogen sulphide generated during the dyeing process. In the present paper, hydrazine sulphate, glucose, and sodium borohydride in the presence of sodium hydroxide were used as ecologically safe reduction systems for the CI Sulphur Black 1 dyeing of cotton fabric, and results were compared with those obtained using sodium sulphide. Dyeing processes were carried out at 90 °C for 60 min, and the colour yield (the K/S value), dyeing fastness, and breaking strength of dyed fabrics after soaping were measured. Response surface methodology was employed for experimental design and optimisation of results. Mathematical model equations were derived and statistical analysis carried out by computer simulation programming using Minitab v.15. At a dosage of 0.8 g l−1 of CI Sulphur Black 1, the optimum sodium borohydride reduction system (sodium borohydride 0.47 g l−1, sodium hydroxide 0.65 g l−1) exhibited the highest colour yield and the lowest chemical oxygen demand of the residual dyebath.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dyeing and Modifying Textile Fibers · Enzyme-mediated dye degradation · Dye analysis and toxicity

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

College of Textiles and Garments Hebei University of Science and Technology Shijiazhuang 050018 China

Funding

Hebei Natural Science Foundation · Shijiazhuang Scientific Research and Development Plan, China

References (14)

Show source-provided references
1. Broadbent A D · 2001 · 379
2. 10.1021/es049848410.1021/es0498484 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0143-7208(96)00026-510.1016/S0143-7208(96)00026-5 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2006.05.04110.1016/j.dyepig.2006.05.041 ↗
5. 10.1016/0143-7208(94)85001-110.1016/0143-7208(94)85001-1 ↗
6. ISO 105‐F09:2009 Textiles: Tests for colour fastness. Part F09: Specification for cotton rubbing cloth(Geneva:ISO 2009).
7. ISO 13934‐1:2013 Textiles: Tensile properties of fabrics. Part 1: Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method(Geneva:ISO 2013).
8. 10.1016/j.cej.2007.01.00110.1016/j.cej.2007.01.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2008.02.00310.1016/j.carbpol.2008.02.003 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apcata.2007.02.01410.1016/j.apcata.2007.02.014 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.talanta.2012.11.02610.1016/j.talanta.2012.11.026 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.09.01510.1016/j.hydromet.2013.09.015 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.10210.1016/j.cej.2012.12.102 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.06210.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.062 ↗