Dynamic strain aging studied at the atomic scale
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Dynamic strain aging arises from the interaction between solute atoms and matrix dislocations in strained metallic alloy. It initiates jerky dislocation motion and abrupt softening, causing negative strain rate sensitivity. This effect leads to instable flow phenomena at the macroscopic scale, appearing as a serrated stress–strain response and deformation banding. These macroscopic features are referred to as the Portevin–Le Chatelier effect (PLC). Here we study the atomistic origin of dynamic strain aging in an Al-4.8 at.% Mg alloy using atom probe tomography (APT) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Samples were prepared from as-cold rolled (90% thickness reduction), stabilized (120 °C, 20 h) and recrystallized sheets (400 °C, 10 min), respectively. In the stabilized state, Mg was found to decorate aligned dislocations with up to ∼12.5 at.%. Tensile tests in combination with thermographic and laser speckle observations were used to map the deformation bands for the site-specific extraction of APT samples from regions inside the PLC bands. We observed an asymmetrical Mg distribution along some of the dislocations, matching model predictions for high dislocation speeds at peak drag stress by Zhang and Curtin. In this case, the Mg distribution is characterized by depletion in the compressive regime above the dislocation slip plane and enrichment in the dilatation region below the slip plane. Mg also depletes in a tail-like form behind fast-moving dislocations, further promoting slip localization.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Microstructure and mechanical properties · Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. Hatch · 1984
2. Cottrell · Proc. Phys. Soc. A · 1948 · 62 · 4910.1088/0370-1298/62/1/308 ↗
3. McCormick · Acta Metall. · 1972 · 20 · 35110.1016/0001-6160(72)90028-4 ↗
4. Van Den Beukel · Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) · 1975 · 30 · 19710.1002/pssa.2210300120 ↗
5. Mulford · Acta Metall. · 1979 · 27 · 112510.1016/0001-6160(79)90130-5 ↗
6. Kubin · Acta Metall. Mater. · 1990 · 38 · 67910.1016/0956-7151(90)90021-8 ↗
7. Kubin · Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) · 1992 · 172 · 17310.1002/pssb.2221720117 ↗
8. Kok · Acta Mater. · 2003 · 51 · 365110.1016/S1359-6454(03)00114-9 ↗
9. Picu · Acta Mater. · 2004 · 52 · 344710.1016/j.actamat.2004.03.042 ↗
10. Fressengeas · Mat. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 400 · 22610.1016/j.msea.2005.02.073 ↗
11. Curtin · Nat. Mater. · 2006 · 5 · 87510.1038/nmat1765 ↗
12. Leyson · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 387310.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.037 ↗
13. Picu · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 390 · 33410.1016/j.msea.2004.08.029 ↗
14. Cottrell · Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A · 1949 · 199 · 10410.1098/rspa.1949.0128 ↗
15. Yoshinaga · Philos. Mag. · 1971 · 23 · 136710.1080/14786437108217008 ↗
16. Hirth · 1982
17. Hu · J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 96 · 22910.1063/1.1755858 ↗
18. Model. Simul.
19. Kelly · Microsc. Microanal. · 2004 · 10 · 37310.1017/S1431927604040565 ↗
20. Kelly · Microsc. Microanal. · 2007 · 13 · 1604
21. Miller · 2000
22. Vurpillot · J. Microsc. · 2001 · 203 · 29510.1046/j.1365-2818.2001.00923.x ↗
23. Geiser · Microsc. Microanal. · 2007 · 13 · 43710.1017/S1431927607070948 ↗
24. Boll · Ultramicroscopy · 2007 · 107 · 79610.1016/j.ultramic.2007.02.011 ↗
25. Moody · Ultramicroscopy · 2009 · 109 · 81510.1016/j.ultramic.2009.03.016 ↗
26. Miller · J. Mater. Sci. · 2006 · 41 · 780810.1007/s10853-006-0518-5 ↗
27. Blavette · Science · 1999 · 286 · 231710.1126/science.286.5448.2317 ↗
28. Duarte · Science · 2013 · 341 · 37210.1126/science.1230081 ↗
29. Araullo-Peters · Scripta Mater. · 2012 · 66 · 90710.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.02.022 ↗
30. Liddicoat · Nat. Commun. · 2010 · 1 · 110.1038/ncomms1062 ↗
31. Gault · Mater. Today · 2012 · 15 · 37810.1016/S1369-7021(12)70164-5 ↗
32. Herbig · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 112 · 12610310.1103/PhysRevLett.112.126103 ↗
33. Guo · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 03550110.1103/PhysRevLett.113.035501 ↗
34. Li · Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2014 · 113 · 10610410.1103/PhysRevLett.113.106104 ↗
35. Li · Acta Mater. · 2011 · 59 · 396510.1016/j.actamat.2011.03.022 ↗
36. Shabadi · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2004 · A364 · 14010.1016/j.msea.2003.08.013 ↗
37. Ait-Amokhtar · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2008 · A448 · 54010.1016/j.msea.2007.11.075 ↗
38. Louche · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2005 · 404 · 18810.1016/j.msea.2005.05.058 ↗
39. Eisenlohr · Acta Mater. · 2012 · 60 · 399410.1016/j.actamat.2012.03.008 ↗
40. Lawrence · Microsc. Microanal. · 2006 · 12 · 174210.1017/S1431927606064099 ↗
41. Utke · J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B · 2008 · 26 · 119710.1116/1.2955728 ↗
42. Chihab · Scripta Metall. · 1987 · 21 · 20310.1016/0036-9748(87)90435-2 ↗
43. Miller · 1996
44. Vurpillot · Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2000 · 76 · 312710.1063/1.126545 ↗
45. Park · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2008 · 491 · 8810.1016/j.msea.2008.01.065 ↗
46. Du · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2003 · A363 · 14010.1016/S0921-5093(03)00624-5 ↗
47. Hong · J. Nucl. Mater. · 2005 · 340 · 30710.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.12.012 ↗
48. Nikulin · Mater. Sci. Eng. A · 2011 · 528 · 134010.1016/j.msea.2010.10.056 ↗
49. Gerold · Acta Metall. · 1989 · 37 · 217710.1016/0001-6160(89)90143-0 ↗
50. Neuhäuser · Mater. Sci. Eng. · 1986 · 81 · 20110.1016/0025-5416(86)90263-6 ↗
51. Xu · Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. · 2006 · 14 · 19510.1088/0965-0393/14/2/005 ↗