Crystallographic and morphological relationships between β phase and the Widmanstätten and allotriomorphic α phase at special β grain boundaries in an α/β titanium alloy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In the present study, the relationship between the crystallographic orientations and growth directions of grain boundary-allotriomorphic-α (GB α) and secondary Widmanstatten α laths growing from the GB α at grain boundaries separating β grains with specific misorientations has been examined. These relationships have been determined using a variety of characterization techniques, including scanning electron microscopy, orientation imaging microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and a dual-beam focused ion beam instrument to provide site-selected TEM foils. Two very interesting cases, one in which the two adjacent β grains are rotated mutually by approximately 10.5° about a common 〈1 1 0〉 direction and the other in which the two β grains are in a twin relationship, i.e. a 60° rotation about a common 〈1 1 1〉 direction, have been studied. It was discovered that the α laths growing into two adjacent β grains from the common grain boundary may have the same orientation in both grains, while they may have either large (∼88.8°) or small (28.8°) angular differences in growth directions in the two adjacent β grains, depending on the relative misorientation of the β grains. The growth directions of the α laths growing from such boundaries are explained on the basis of the Burgers orientation relationship between the Widmanstatten α and the β phases and the interfacial structure proposed previously by various workers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (19)
Show source-provided references
1. Equilibrium phases
2. Lutjering · 2003
3. Burgers · Physica · 1934 · 1
4. Furuhara · Metall Mater Trans A · 1996 · 27A · 163510.1007/BF02649821 ↗
5. Dube · Rev Mètall · 1958 · 55 · 20110.1051/metal/195855030201 ↗
6. Aaronson · Scripta Metall · 1987 · 21 · 124110.1016/0036-9748(87)90356-5 ↗
7. Furuhara · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 2866
8. Furuhara · Phil Mag · 1995 · 72
9. Furuhara · Mater Sci Eng A · 2001 · 312 · 14510.1016/S0921-5093(00)01904-3 ↗
10. Bhattacharyya · Acta Mater · 2003 · 51 · 467910.1016/S1359-6454(03)00179-4 ↗
11. Bunge · 1982
12. Lee · Acta Metall · 1979 · 23 · 79910.1016/0001-6160(75)90196-0 ↗
13. Lee · Acta Metall · 1979 · 23 · 80910.1016/0001-6160(75)90197-2 ↗
14. Furuhara · Acta Metall Mater · 1991 · 39 · 288710.1016/0956-7151(91)90105-A ↗
15. Ameyama · J Jpn Inst Met · 1986 · 50 · 60210.2320/jinstmet1952.50.7_602 ↗
16. Dahmen · Acta Met · 1982 · 30 · 6310.1016/0001-6160(82)90045-1 ↗
17. Suri · Acta Mater · 1999 · 47 · 101910.1016/S1359-6454(98)00364-4 ↗
18. Kar · 2005
19. Wilson · Phil Mag · 1997 · 76 · 47110.1080/01418619708209986 ↗