TEM study of structural and microstructural characteristics of a precipitate phase in Ni-rich Ni–Ti–Hf and Ni–Ti–Zr shape memory alloys
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The precipitates formed after suitable thermal treatments in seven Ni-rich Ni–Ti–Hf and Ni–Ti–Zr high-temperature shape memory alloys have been investigated by conventional and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. In both ternary systems, the precipitate coarsening kinetics become faster as the Ni and ternary element contents (Hf or Zr) of the bulk alloy are increased, in agreement with the precipitate composition measured by energy-dispersive X-ray microanalysis. The precipitate structure has been found to be the same in both Hf- and Zr-containing ternary alloys, and determined to be a superstructure of the B2 austenite phase, which arises from a recombination of the Hf/Zr and Ti atoms in their sublattice. Two different structural models for the precipitate phase were optimized using density functional theory methods. These calculations indicate that the energetics of the structure are not very sensitive to the atomic configuration of the Ti–Hf/Zr planes, thus significant configurational disorder due to entropic effects can be envisaged at high temperatures. The precipitates are fully coherent with the austenite B2 matrix; however, upon martensitic transformation, they lose some coherency with the B19′ matrix as a result of the transformation shear process in the surrounding matrix. The strain accommodation around the particles is much easier in the Ni–Ti–Zr-containing alloys than in the Ni–Ti–Hf system, which correlates well with the lower transformation strain and stiffness predicted for the Ni–Ti–Zr alloys. The B19′ martensite twinning modes observed in the studied Ni-rich ternary alloys are not changed by the new precipitated phase, being equivalent to those previously reported in Ni-poor ternary alloys.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Shape Memory Alloy Transformations · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties · High Entropy Alloys Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. van Humbeeck · 1998
2. Ma · Int Mater Rev · 2010 · 55 · 25710.1179/095066010X12646898728363 ↗
3. AbuJudom DN, Thoma PE, Kao MY, Angst DR. US patent #5114504; 1992.
4. Angst · J Phys IV · 1995 · C8 · 747
5. van Humbeeck · Trans ASME – J Eng Mater Technol · 1999 · 12 · 9810.1115/1.2816006 ↗
6. Firstov · Mater Sci Eng A · 2004 · 378 · 210.1016/j.msea.2003.10.324 ↗
7. Meng · Scripta Mater · 2000 · 42 · 34110.1016/S1359-6462(99)00347-4 ↗
8. Olier · J Phys IV · 1995 · C8 · 741
9. Noebe · 2008
10. Otsuka · Prog Mater Sci · 2005 · 50 · 51110.1016/j.pmatsci.2004.10.001 ↗
11. Panchenko · Phys Metal Metall · 2008 · 106 · 57710.1134/S0031918X08120065 ↗
12. Meng · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 54 · 159910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.01.017 ↗
13. Bigelow · Scripta Mater · 2011 · 64 · 72510.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.12.028 ↗
14. Coughlin · Scripta Mater · 2012 · 67 · 11210.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.03.036 ↗
15. Benafan · Metall Mater Trans A · 2012 · 43 · 453910.1007/s11661-012-1297-z ↗
16. Evirgen · Funct Mater Lett · 2012 · 5 · 125003810.1142/S1793604712500385 ↗
17. Evirgen · Scripta Mater · 2013 · 69 · 35410.1016/j.scriptamat.2013.05.006 ↗
18. Han · Acta Mater · 1998 · 46 · 27310.1016/S1359-6454(97)00187-0 ↗
19. Yang · Acta Mater · 2013 · 61 · 333510.1016/j.actamat.2013.02.023 ↗
20. Sandu · Scripta Mater · 2006 · 55 · 107910.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.08.033 ↗
21. Sandu · Mater Sci Forum · 2007 · 539–543 · 316310.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.539-543.3163 ↗
22. Sandu · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 43210.2320/matertrans.48.432 ↗
23. Electron Microscopy Software – Java version. Stadelmann PA. CIME, École Polytechnique Féderale de Lausanne.
24. Kohn · Phys Rev · 1965 · 140 · A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
25. Hohenberg · Phys Rev · 1964 · 136 · B86410.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
26. Kohn · J Phys Chem · 1996 · 100 · 97410.1021/jp960669l ↗
27. Kresse · Comput Mater Sci · 1996 · 6 · 1510.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
28. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
29. Hafner · Comput Phys Commun · 2007 · 177 · 610.1016/j.cpc.2007.02.045 ↗
30. Perdew · Phys Rev Lett · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
31. Monkhorst · Phys Rev B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
32. Methfessel · Phys Rev B · 1989 · 40 · 361610.1103/PhysRevB.40.3616 ↗
33. Blöchl · Phys Rev B · 1994 · 49 · 1622310.1103/PhysRevB.49.16223 ↗
34. Zunger · Phys Rev Lett · 1990 · 65 · 35310.1103/PhysRevLett.65.353 ↗
35. Shin · Phys Rev B · 2006 · 74 · 02420410.1103/PhysRevB.74.024204 ↗
36. van de Walle · J Phase Equilib · 2002 · 23 · 34810.1361/105497102770331596 ↗
37. Han · Acta Mater · 1996 · 44 · 371110.1016/1359-6454(96)00034-1 ↗
38. Mercier · J Appl Phys · 1980 · 51 · 183310.1063/1.327750 ↗
39. Dalle · Scripta Mater · 2001 · 44 · 92910.1016/S1359-6462(00)00678-3 ↗
40. Santamarta · Mater Trans · 2004 · 45 · 181110.2320/matertrans.45.1811 ↗
41. Waitz · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 13710.1016/j.actamat.2003.08.036 ↗
42. Kockar · Acta Mater · 2008 · 56 · 363010.1016/j.actamat.2008.04.001 ↗
43. Tsuchiya · Scripta Mater · 2009 · 60 · 74910.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.12.058 ↗
44. Nishida · Acta Metall Mater · 1995 · 43 · 121910.1016/0956-7151(94)00332-C ↗
45. Gupta · Trans JIM · 1973 · 14 · 29210.2320/matertrans1960.14.292 ↗
46. Zheng · Scripta Mater · 1998 · 38 · 124910.1016/S1359-6462(98)00025-6 ↗
47. Mulder JH. Ph D thesis. Universiteit Twente; 1995.
48. Dalle · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 355710.1016/S1359-6454(02)00151-9 ↗
49. Wei · Mater Lett · 2006 · 60 · 305410.1016/j.matlet.2006.02.092 ↗
50. Meng · Acta Mater · 2010 · 58 · 375110.1016/j.actamat.2010.03.015 ↗
51. Nishida · Metallography · 1988 · 21 · 27510.1016/0026-0800(88)90025-0 ↗
52. Le Page · Phys Rev B · 2002 · 65 · 10410410.1103/PhysRevB.65.104104 ↗