Ductility improvement of amorphous steels: Roles of shear modulus and electronic structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Metal–metalloid composition effects on the mechanical properties of Fe–Cr–Mo–P–C–B amorphous steel alloys have been investigated. Compressive plastic strain, elastic moduli and microhardness were measured. The present amorphous steels were found to exhibit enhanced plastic strains up to ∼3.6% and fracture strengths up to ∼3.5 GPa. Moreover, the plastic strain increased quite rapidly with the decrease in shear modulus. The shear modulus values measured are appreciably lower than those reported for previous amorphous steel compositions that did not contain phosphorus; and the Poisson’s ratios obtained are in the range ∼0.33–0.34. The present findings indicate that the ductility of amorphous steels can be significantly improved by chemically tuning the elastic properties which are determined by the amorphous structure and chemical bonding. First-principles electronic structure calculations show that ductility can be improved by partially replacing elements that create ionic and covalent bonds with other elements that favor metallic cohesion.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Glass properties and applications · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Inoue · 1999 · vol. 554 · 251
2. Shen · Appl Phys Lett · 1999 · 75 · 4910.1063/1.124273 ↗
3. Inoue · Mater Trans · 2001 · 42 · 97010.2320/matertrans.42.970 ↗
4. Pang · Mater Trans · 2001 · 42 · 37610.2320/matertrans.42.376 ↗
5. Ponnambalam · Appl Phys Lett · 2003 · 83 · 113110.1063/1.1599636 ↗
6. Inoue · J Mater Res · 2003 · 18 · 148710.1557/JMR.2003.0205 ↗
7. Ponnambalam · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 132010.1557/JMR.2004.0176 ↗
8. Ponnambalam · J Mater Res · 2004 · 19 · 304610.1557/JMR.2004.0374 ↗
9. Lu · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 92 · 24550310.1103/PhysRevLett.92.245503 ↗
10. Stoica · Intermetallics · 2005 · 13 · 76410.1016/j.intermet.2004.12.016 ↗
11. Zhang · Mater Trans · 2007 · 48 · 115710.2320/matertrans.48.1157 ↗
12. Pang · Acta Mater · 2002 · 50 · 48910.1016/S1359-6454(01)00366-4 ↗
13. Schroers · Phys Rev Lett · 2004 · 93 · 25550610.1103/PhysRevLett.93.255506 ↗
14. Lewandowski · Philos Mag Lett · 2005 · 85 · 7710.1080/09500830500080474 ↗
15. Gu · Appl Phys Lett · 2006 · 88 · 21190510.1063/1.2206149 ↗
16. Gu · Scripta Mater · 2007 · 57 · 28910.1016/j.scriptamat.2007.05.006 ↗
17. Wang HJ, Gu XJ, Poon SJ, Shiflet GJ, Phys Rev B, in press.
18. Sheng · Nature · 2006 · 439 · 41910.1038/nature04421 ↗
19. Inoue · Acta Mater · 2004 · 52 · 409310.1016/j.actamat.2004.05.022 ↗
20. Gu · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 34410.1557/jmr.2007.0036 ↗
21. Yao · Appl Phys Lett · 2007 · 90 · 06190110.1063/1.2437722 ↗
22. Liu · J Mater Res · 2007 · 22 · 86910.1557/jmr.2007.0104 ↗
23. Xi · Phys Rev Lett · 2005 · 94 · 12551010.1103/PhysRevLett.94.125510 ↗
24. Dronskowski · J Phys Chem · 1993 · 97 · 861710.1021/j100135a014 ↗
25. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1996 · 54 · 1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
26. Kresse · Phys Rev B · 1999 · 59 · 175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
27. Perdew · Phys Rev B · 1992 · 45 · 1324410.1103/PhysRevB.45.13244 ↗
28. Andersen · Z Phys B · 1995 · 97 · 3510.1007/BF01317585 ↗